[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.jpg (805 KB, 1440x2160)
805 KB
805 KB JPG
So, this is a fairly inoffensive Serious Sam game with some fun combat scenarios. I wonder why everyone derided it so hard back when it came out.
It's not like the greatest shit or anything but it plays like a Serious Sam game proper, looks good and runs fine, reviewers treated it like a bag of wet shit.

I don't think anything they made ever topped Serious Sam 2, but 4 is so much more fun than 3.
>>
>>724229664
>looks good and runs fine
Sure as hell didn't when it launched
>>
Is 4 the one with the open world?
>>
>>724229664
>I wonder why everyone derided it so hard back when it came out.
Breakfast in France, god awful level



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.