How well do they hold up?
>>724234972Outside of the first one having awful camera, pretty good actually. Also WW>SoT>TT
>>724235185>Also WW>SoT>>>TTFTFY
>>724234972They haven't aged well, and I say this as someone who loved them growing up
I STAND ALONE
>>724234972Badly.The first one was the only one worth a fuck even back then and it's not playable by modern audience standards.I still don't want Ubi to remaster it.
>>724235487>>724235185TT could be great but>carriage races>constantly depleting life during the dark prince sequences>final boss is a thing with a bald head
>>724234972Loved this trilogy. The 08 cell shaded PoP game was pretty good too! Shame it didn't sell well do all we got was more assassins creed
>>724234972Warrior Within filtered me at first, but it ended up being my favorite.
They're objectively unplayable trash and need UE5 remakes to make them acceptable for contemporary audiences.
>>724234972>I>STAND ALONE
Which version of WW isn't broken?
>>724234972Sands of Time is alrightWarrior Within is a direct improvement minus some bugs which can hardlock your savefileTwo Thrones is the worst one and I would call it not worth playing
>>724242016They're all broken to varying degrees though you could probably emulate the Xbox version nowadays
>>724242016All of them, but the PC version is mod compatible
I only played Sands and Warrior on release , there's nothing in this fucking world that can make me play Sands nowadays, will buy Thrones in the next sale though and will both Warrior and Thrones.
>>724243539>there's nothing in this fucking world that can make me play Sands nowadaysyour loss
Played them recently on the HD collection. They are pretty fun, but the HD collection has a lot of audio bugs.
>>724235185>>724235487based, TT was garbage. what a fucking disappointment at all levels
van helsing
