[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: img_2005_sm.png (70 KB, 1100x468)
70 KB
70 KB PNG
Are any of the titles worth playing these days? Or is it a series better left in the past?
>>
>>724281230
Aren't they like really interesting dungeon crawlers? I've never played one, I just know for some reason they're a hot ticket or were in Japan.
>>
>>724281230
I'm a weeb so all I now was Labyrinth of Lost Souls and it was pretty okay, my personal GOAT of that genre keeps being Shining the Holy Ark tho
>>
>>724281230
I tried a bunch of dungeon crawlers (EO, SMT: SJ, Dark Spire) and the only ones I could get into were Wizardry remake, System Shock remake and Legend of Grimrock.
>>
>>724281230
would rather play SMT Strange Journey and Holy Ark
>>
>>724281230
play Demon Gaze (first one, the second sucks) and Stranger in Sword City
>>
>>724281230
How patient are you? It's worth hopping into the first few games for a few minutes if only to see how the town and menus evolve over time. Like in the first game you have to buy and equip all your adventurers but I think by 2 and 3 they are coming with equipped gear when you recruit them. Lots of little brick moments like that.

Actuallly playing something I'd recommend the ps2 game that got a translation. The only modern EN release after that is the gacha
>>
>>724281230
Daphne is cool, you'll get bored of it after B4 probably, I did
>>
>>724281807
Daphne really surprised me. We need more dungeon crawlers with modern graphics.
>>
I don't really like the genre but somehow I got my hands on Bard's Tale IV and I started enjoying it but then when you finish the tutorial area and have to recruit your party, the character models were abysmally ugly... and you can't mod it or anything, so I gave up.
I'll never understand how you can put so much effort in hours of massive 3d maps but you can't draw a feminine woman.
>>
Daphne is pretty good, i like to see my onahole travel together with me
>>
>>724282312
that's what I have been wanting since forever, why it took so long to make such thing.
>>
>>724282312
>onahole
Why are you lying? There are no faeries in this game.
>>
>>724281230
the series is wonderful. The series is also brutal. The series is also aggressively oldschool
I do recommend playing Wizardry 1-3. I also recommend doing so after playing other, more approachable entries in the genre first, or playing the SNES/PS1 trilogy ports. You could also play the recent remake of Wizardry 1, which will hopefully one day also include 2 and 3
no one will blame you for skipping Wizardry 4 (aka the literal hardest game ever made), but 5 through 8 are solid

good places to start in the genre:
Megami Tensei/Shin Megami Tensei/Strange Journey
Shining in the Darkness/Shining the Holy Ark
Arcana
Potato Flowers in Full Bloom
Legend of Grimrock (warning, real time combat)
Might & Magic - World of Xeen
>>
>>724281230
Nah. Wizardry is shit. Play Shin Megami Tensei instead. Far superior in every way.
>>
>>724281230
They're worth playing for the historical importance alone. They are unrelenting at times, classic mechanics that would never fly nowadays like level draining are on full display here, so it's not for everyone to finish. But it's worth playing just to see where we came from, even if you aren't the kind to finish it.
6-8 are a bit more modern and a bit more pleasent to modern tastes. Also, much easier to get ahold of. But they're still pretty far removed from modern RPGs.
>>
>>724281230
Etrian Odyssey IV. Also Wizardry 8 is fucking KINO, gonna need a guide shit gets non-sensical after you leave the tutorial cave.
>>
File: 1760855570605376.jpg (278 KB, 1536x2048)
278 KB
278 KB JPG
how did japs take over wizardry if it was made by westerners in the first place?
>>
>>724282513
there is a fearies in the pv... it is going to come up...
>>
>>724283309
>Wizardry 8
its a massive shame that it was unfinished
>>
>>724281230
I would still recommend Wiz 8 to anyone today.
It's accessible and also a very unique experience, given that it's kind of open world
>>
>>724283618
Because they REALLY loved it.
>>
>>724283724
In its finished form it would become the most pure form of autism. Earth is not ready. Maybe those japs that has the IP now try to contact ubisoft for Might and Magic rights and unleash the most powerful collab ever seen. And of course OST must be done by Paul Romero
>>
>>724283618
One of the original wizardry devs was a massive weeb (he literally used the money he made from wizardry to make one of the first english anime subtitling companies), and the games ended up becoming massively popular in japan as popularity in the west died off. Eventually this lead to a lot of japanese exclusively wizardry games, then when sirtech went out of business they ended up selling the IP to japanese companies who kept the series alive in Japan.
>>
>>724284065
from what ive seen the japs do to the Wizardry name, i dont want them to continue anything and would rather they leave its legacy untarnished
im all for them using a brand new IP though. call it WizadREE or some shit. just not Wizardry.
>>
>>724283618
Sirtech died, but japan loved the series so some nip company bought the rights off them as they died. It got passed around between a bunch of diffrent companies since then.
>>
>>724283797
can I play with a party of 2-4 or do I have to juggles 8 guys ?
>>
>>724284807
You can do what you like, you just won't do very well.
>>
>>724284807
you dont have to create a full party.
itll just be significantly more difficult at the start. but note that theres no way to create or delete characters without starting a new game entirely
>>
What's the best console version of the first 3? I can deal with a lot of old school mechanics but wireframe dungeons is just too far for me.
>>
>>724283618
When it comes to fantasy westerners like open world shit, japs love their dungeons, Anime, manga, videogames, if its fantasy it has dungeons on it
>>
>>724287068
PS1/Saturn. They're Japan-only, but you can switch the language to English in the options menu.
>>
>>724287068
Play the remake version of 1. You can make it as casual or as 1-1 to the original as you want. Also custom portraits https://store.steampowered.com/app/2518960/Wizardry_Proving_Grounds_of_the_Mad_Overlord/
>>
File: 1761539241072.jpg (71 KB, 720x720)
71 KB
71 KB JPG
>>724289103
>>
>>724281230
Do you like grinding and annoying gridmaze dungeon crawling?
>>
>>724283797
How is it compared to might and magic series 6-9?
>>
>>724282872
>I do recommend playing Wizardry 1-3. I also recommend doing so after playing other, more approachable entries in the genre first, or playing the SNES/PS1 trilogy ports. You could also play the recent remake of Wizardry 1, which will hopefully one day also include 2 and 3
Why do people ever recommend this with any series? Going backwards mechanically always feels like shit. You don't need to force yourself to play games if they aren't fun, so the concept of "working up to" playing the worst games in a series is dumb.
>>
Correct answer is 1 through 5 on ps1, 6 on whatever, 7 on ps1, five ordeals remake and daphne variant never ever btw
>>
>>724287548
What are you talking about? There are still a million western dungeon crawler indies being made to this day, and Japan makes games like Elden Ring or Dragon's Dogma, and DQ games always have world maps.
>>
>>724290118
The ps1 games have better qol than original and better art than remake and you can use your party through all five ps1 games.
>>
>>724290227
So why would you ever go play the originals after playing the jp PS1 versions?
>>
>>724281230
3,4,6 and 7 of the mainline are worth playing
apart from that Busin series on ps2 is worth playing
>>
>>724290279
I wouldnt. I just recommended the ps1 versions. The Jun Suemi art alone means the remakes override the originals. The remake of one on pc is okay if you like western warcraft style and dont want to progress your party through multiple games but i still recommend 1-5 on ps1 and honestly 7 is dealers choice but the ps1 version has english patch and novel 3d modeled 2d sprites (like shining in the holy ark) and is a different kind of eyerape from the western version. I just think jun suemis art hard carries it in modern times otherwise yeah play undernaut or stranger of sword city
>>
>>724289762
its way worse than might and magic
wizardry 8 is an abomination and I can safely assume that anyone who praises it has never even bothered to finish it
>>
>>724290507
>wizardry 8 is an abomination and I can safely assume that anyone who praises it has never even bothered to finish it
8 is the only wizardry I've played and I beat it. there was a lot of jank but it was mostly fun. I was disappointed to find out the older games don't have the gadgeteer class.
>>
>>724281230
Play Legend of Grimrock 1+2
>>
>>724290427
>Playing 3 without an imported party from 1 and 2
A quick trip to hell.
>>
>>724290227
Do they reset level though or do you just steamroll the game?
>>
>>724294616
Wizardry 2 keeps your level and spells as you need a party that can teleport to even make it off of the first floor. 3 and 5 reset your levels so biggest benefit is starting with a Ninja or Lord early. You can reassign alignments with 3 and 5 when importing characters.
>>
>>724281230
The good, old titles are about £1 on GOG right now. They're not even worth pirating at that price, so you've got nothing to lose just playing them
>>
>>724282931
As much as I love SMT, and SMT 1 in particular is one of my all time favorite games, Wizardry is really fucking good. I recommend the PS1 ports for 1-5, and the Gaiden spin off series is pretty good too. The translation can be a bit rough at times but they play pretty good.
>>
File: 1566752967871.png (4 KB, 640x400)
4 KB
4 KB PNG
>
The first one is good.
>>
>>724281230
>>724290118
>Are any of the titles worth playing these days?
Yes, assuming you like the dungeon crawler format.

If you enjoy just wandering around in mazes and figuring out how things work, then Wiz 1 is pretty good at that. Most DRPGs have a pretty standard formula that you come to expect, while Wizardry 1 is a lot harsher and you want to become a lot more familiar with how the systems work to play it. Just assuming that you can clear one floor and then move on to the next is not actually going to get you anywhere. If you just want a standard DRPG then probably skip it, but if you like stuff novel then I'd recommend playing. Wiz2-3 is basically more of Wizardry 1, so I'd recommend them or recommend against them together.

I'd also recommend Wizardry 7, because it's a game with a huge world for you to wander around in. You need to find safe places to camp out and rest, rather than having an inn location you can safely sleep in. You have to find NPCs and interact with them to find out where to go, and there's lots of class and skill optimization to worry about. It is a fairly large game and will take you a long time to complete it fully, and you probably won't be playing a similar DRPG somewhere else. Wiz6-8 is an overarching story and you can transfer characters between them, but Wizardry 6 is just going to look like a standard dungeon crawler at first, so Wiz7 has much better first impressions.

While I usually recommend Wizardry 5 first, that's because it plays a lot like other DRPGs. In fact, most japanese DRPGs take mechanics directly from Wizardry 5. So I really wouldn't recommend it if you're looking for something different from the standard DRPG formula. It IS the standard DRPG formula.
>>
>>724283797
I love the look of this game but is the combat turn based slop or is it real time kino?
>>
>>724298571
3D movement, turn based combat, but you can move the character-blob around when selecting turns to determine who can hit what and what characters are out of range. It's a bit of an oddball, but not real time combat.
>>
>>724298571
It’s turn-based and painfully slow. If you want something similar but in real time, try Might and Magic 6, 7 and 8.
>>
>>724281230
I played Wizardry 6. It was really hard!
>>
>>724298959
Wiz7 is even harder.
>>
>>724290118
People saying that assume enough general intelligence that you not having to play the earlier games at all is implied.

They're telling you to start with the later games, as they're much better. The earlier ones will still be there if you want them.
>>
File: wizardry ps2.png (492 KB, 970x728)
492 KB
492 KB PNG
>>724281230
The only one I've played is 6. It was pretty fun; it's simple but mapping out stuff tile by tile on grid paper actually turns out pretty enjoyable in a zen kind of way. I stopped because I'm an ADHD retard but I've always wanted to go back one day and play through 6-8.

I also played a bit of one of the PS2 Wizardry games which had a lot of soul but was just too autistic for me.
>>
>>724298571
Wizardry is THE game that all JRPGs are built off of and 8 still retains a lot of that DNA.
Like the other anon said, MM6-8 is what you want. They have a turn based mode you probably want to put it into occasionally but even then it's not a lot of waiting around. In real-time they can almost play like fantasy Doom with the amount of enemies you blast through in some areas.
>>
>>724298932
>blacks
No thanks, shan't be playing proto-woke trash
>>
>>724301692
ok
>>
>>724302112
this better be the tightest shit ever nigger



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.