So, /v/, is it true that misogyny in online games just stems from poor-performing males, and chad high-skilled players are chill with women and slip in their dms?
idk idgaf bout w*men
maybe in Gaylo but I've been top in several games that it's pointless to brag about anonymously and everyone at that level bags on foidsIt is what it is
>study
>>724299890What a bunch of losers
>>724299825>the authorsand who are they? what is the methodology of this "study??" how is hostility defined?
>>724299906>says the retard on /v/ and also good at nothinglol
>>724299825>tumblr screencap thread
>>724299825lmao kikes will lie about absolutely anything
>>724300565I'm sorry that you're bad at video games even though it's the only thing you have.:(
>>724299825If you're not misogynistic then you're a gullible sap. Skill issue, indeed.
>>724299957Just read it here, chud.https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4503401/>Lower-skilled players were more hostile towards a female-voiced teammate, especially when performing poorly. In contrast, lower-skilled players behaved submissively towards a male-voiced player in the identical scenario.>Low-status males increase female-directed hostility to minimize the loss of status as a consequence of hierarchical reconfiguration resulting from the entrance of a woman into the competitive arena.>Higher-skilled players were more positive towards a female relative to a male teammate. As higher-skilled players have less to fear from hierarchical reorganization, these males behave more positively in an attempt to support and garner a female player’s attention.This basically establishes that White Knights are more high-value males, despite years of chuds calling them "simps."
>>724301457>This basically establishes that White Knights are more high-value maleslmaorumao
Survivorship bias. Most people turn off voice coms.
>>724302607Not good players.
