classic lara croft thread>WANTSD
what is it about her that is so expressly engineered for shotas
I went through the first three games over the past year and I just got the second collection, did the part with young Lara in IV. I tried some of them out as a kid but this is the first time I've sat down and played them through in full.
>>724305570kek, based
>>724305704what do you think so far? is there any reason you've waited this long to replay them? they did come out over 25 years ago, after all
>>724305863I didn't have the best experience wih them on PS1, it was too hard to understand where to go. They were among the first 3D games I had played and didn't have simple movement and level design like Crash or Spyro. I never really thought to give them another chance until the first remastered collection was announced and I really appreciate now. I consider TR1 in particular to be a masterpiece.
>>724305453
>>724306026>I didn't have the best experience wih them on PS1, it was too hard to understand where to go.yeah, that seems to be a common complaint... the level design can be pretty nuts at times
>>724306030hot
>>724306030the one where she's running like this and flubs a jump and ragdolls is hilarious
>>724306173the physics in underworld is so oddeven in the first underwater temple level there's a physics-based puzzle and if you have physx or something turned on, it glitches out and you can't beat the puzzle
angel of darkness lara but in.... underworld!
>>724306771i wanna get into her underworld if you get what i mean
>>724307378Can i watch?
i love this gigastacy bitch queen