[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_5178.jpg (347 KB, 1920x1080)
347 KB
347 KB JPG
Did it sell enough for square to try and make a new game?
>>
>>724318280
I hope so
>>
File: 1744529355211118.jpg (801 KB, 1182x1200)
801 KB
801 KB JPG
who knows
>>
>>724318280
Square has been shitting out a billion flops for the same budget a tactics sequel would take, the only reason they haven't made one is they dont have the staff who want to.
>>
>>724320152
Wonder if they would put it back in Ivalice or would they have to get Matsuno on board for that.
>>
>>724320152
It's funny now that you mention it.
>>
I never buy new games and I bought it. It's my favorite game of the year, though it's kinda cheating because it was made 28 years ago.
>>
File: Vagrant Story.jpg (326 KB, 1200x1800)
326 KB
326 KB JPG
>Tactics Ogre Remaster
>FF Tactics Remaster

Where the hell is the actual GOAT Ivalice-era game already?
>>
Yes, they’re working on the next one which takes heavy inspiration from Baldur’s Gate. You create your own character and it’s a few generations after the War of the Lions. It’ll have multiplayer coop too.
>>
>>724318280
Why would you want one? There's nobody competent enough at Square to do so. And even if they did the script would just get butchered halfway in to focus on hurr gurl power, men evul.
>>
>>724318280
I didn't buy it.
But I hope they do Tactics Advance.
>>
>>724322158
same
>>
>>724318280
For any other company, yes.
For Square Enix? They're retarded, so they were probably expecting 20 morzillion copies sold or something dumb.

>>724320152
They have staff that directly have stated that they want to. But they need someone higher up to champion it.
There's some super high up that personally loves the SaGa games, which is why it's been getting so much love all over the place despite just selling "okay" numbers.
>>
>>724322158
>I don't give a company money
>but I wish they make more games
Baka
>>
>>724322059
I hate shitposts like this because I would unironically love a create-a-character protagonist and a CRPG-style FF with Tactics-like combat.
>>
>>724324016
I think that's the point, you can always find a handful of low level employees who want to make anything but if nobody with sway wants to then nothing gets done. If the company was really that desperate to make a new tactics game they wouldn't have made triangle strategy
>>
>>724322158
I didn't buy it either, letting the guys wear ribbons and perfume is a gay change and it trivializes the game even further.
>>
If they did do Ivalice what era should they set it in?
>>
>>724318280
>Did it sell enough
For square to make more demake woke casualized slopfests? Yes.
>>
>>724321859
It's not actually that good, it's an action game with extra steps.

Plus, Tactics Ogre >>>>>>>>> FFT.
>>
>>724324016
SaGa probably only still exists because Kawazu is one of the last remaining Square old guard employees because he hasn’t been forced to commit sudoku to shoulder the blame of some mediocre bloated AAA title not selling five trillion copies, so they continue to give him modest budgets for his modest titles out of respect.
>>
>>724318280
>buy this remaster and maybe, just maybe, we'll make another actual game!
This is ALWAYS a lie, never believe it. It won't happen unless they already had intentions of doing it, no remaster "signaling" matters.
>>
>remake can't even keep a thread up this soon after release
Yeah, I'm thinking it's over



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.