ITT: games only you played
was really fun.so of course it absolutely had to be killed early.
>>724644013
>>724644013Can be played in singleplayer?
>>724644013>games only you played>gwentNigga everyone loved the gwent standalone game, who do you think you were playing against?
>>724644429If you buy the singleplayer expansion
>>724644013I knew a guy who played this all the time. He's no longer a guy though.
>>724644013;_;7
>>724644481During its peak there were still zero threads here and zero generals on /vg/ bro
>>724644429Why? It's still alive>>724644720That's not the same game
>>724644013Lost Kingdoms and Lost Kingdoms II.
>>724644963>/v/ has bad taste in gamesWhat else is new
>>724645283/v/ is not one person
>>724644963That's because people discussed gwent in witcher threads rather than in separate generals
>>724646179Not the same gwent, stfu
rip beta gwent
>>724644013that one person is me
>>724644013It was fun for a while. around 2020-21 I think, before they added a lot of stupid powercreep sets. it started with that one vampire expansion.The best mode though was draft before they ruined it. actually try and use your random cards to create combos the game enables. I'm still looking for a game that does something similar.
>>724647591>they delete arena (which was perfectly fine)>add a new mode that's basically in pre-alpha>also it needs constant vetting by the devs (whereas arena, being completely random, would have automatically accomodated new cards)>it crashes and burnsThat dev team was just plain retarded.They apparently blew a lot of money on Thronebreaker too
>>724644013I've played it. The most fun I've had with this game was just before Master Mirror, when Impera Enforcers still dealt 2 damage. I've had a lot of fun with the Operator+Impera+Imposter deck that allowed me to utterly shit up the board with spies and enforcers.
>>724648990I have a lot of nostalgia for those times, but honestly the game's much better now.Back then we had WAY too much of "if this thing sticks, I win. If it gets killed, I lose" that it was basically a match-up roulette.Decks nowadays are a lot more midrangey, and therefore games are decided more by the skill of the player than match-up roulette
>>724646207No wonder you never saw anyone talking about gwent, you were too busy pretending everyone was talking about the ingame version
>>724644013>was actually good in the beginning >gets "overhauled" from 3 rows to 2 rows>completely ruined and never recovers
i put 500+ hours into gwent, played since "closed" beta. i actually really liked the game before thronebreaker update or whatever
>>724644013gwent classic when? nilfgaard alchemy was one of the most fun deck i've ever played in a CCG.
>>724651362There literally were no threads for this game. Not regularly at least
>>724651450t. fatass casualnigger
>>724644013Redania won that's a good thing and Radovid is recovering.
