[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.png (1.48 MB, 1940x882)
1.48 MB
1.48 MB PNG
>Arc gets a 2* because of AI voices ( The actors were paid for that btw )
>The new cod uses Studio ghibli AI image generation but the same reviewer didnt even complain about it and gave the game 3*
When did you realize 99% of the game "reviewers" are heavily biased?
>>
>>725954163
>When did you realize 99% of the game "reviewers" are heavily biased?
like...20 years ago?
>>
Does it matter when both are shit? Just use your eyes
>>
>>725954163
>the same reviewer
I guess Rick Lane changed is name to Jeremy Peel during that 4 day period between those reviews



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.