If a game requires mods/qol tweaks to be good it's a bad game.
Mods can make a good game, great. Doesn't mean the game is bad, it just has more potential that can be reached through mods. Bad games with mods are usually still bad games, it's just there's mods now.
Fallout doesn't need mods to be enjoyable it needs patches because it's ancient
>>725955830The game is fine as it is though except for the patch that fixes things so you don't get all the bad mutant takeover endings.
>>725955830>NOOOO, YOU CAN'T MAKE A GOOD GAME EVEN BETTER
>>725955830pic unrelated I presume?
>>725955830This game is great without mods. Whats annoying is finding a good resolution
>>725955830u r rarted
>>725955830Least butthurt consoletard, by the way.
>>725955830name one game that is capable of being modded that mods do not improve.
Only thing I would consider patching in is the super mutant town raids time limit
>>725955830If a person needs religion to behave then my friend that person is a piece of shit
>>725955830*if a game has a fan made engine implementation then it's a masterpice
>>725955830Consoledaggot mindset.All games are a collection of code. If the code can be made better then it's a better game. Simple as that. Cope all you want.
>>725955830eh you only really need mods for the classic games so they play properly on modern hardware. I do agree generally though, if you need loads of mods to play a game that vanilla game is a bit shit, but obviously anyone modding a game to their preferences already knows certain systems are bad, and that's why they're modding them to be different.
>>725958941Would you prefer a planet full of autists and spergs?The everyone on the planet would be a virgin that travels by train! Do you really want that?