>>725965993
>i kinda want to play it
why though?

>>725965993
there hasn't been a great change to the gameplay loop since they added a new kind of ship a few months ago. all content in the game is a branch off the core gameplay, which means there's no resetting of progress when new stuff gets added on

>>725965993
>thought no man's sky was gonna be space exploration into different worlds like the oasis from ready player one with one level with laser dinosaurs.
Sad

Youre retarded and I fucking hate you.

>>725965993
They updated it like 100 times but its literally STILL the same exact game as launch. You go around, shoot your laser at rocks, and repeat. I swear to god.

>>725965993
Want to play it?, just do it, the game have FREE updates and patches every month to fix the possible issues of the new updates or just to balance the game.
Also, if you played Starfield you'll be amazed at how a game that weighs so little achieved what Bethesda couldn't using 125 fucking gigas of your memory space.

Don't worry. Updates don't make it better.

Did they fix the most barren planets in the universe still having the generic oxygen flowers and stuff to prevent getting softlock? They could have at least come up with some variations. The problem is that there's not enough variety in the most basic shit that you're dealing with for 90% of the time.

>>725968669
No, they're still there of course. They could've made it so you can only acquire oxygen from rocks as a byproduct but they didn't want to make their already easy game too hard

>>725970531
the oxygen has to be free to harvest in case your mining beam is out of charge