Were any of them good?
>>726000946Yoshi's Woolly World was better on the 3DS by virtue of having a pattern editor and extra levels, other than that I guess Xenoblade 3D was good but only because Xenoblade itself is a really good game, the Switch release left it as the worst way to play the game tho.
>>726000946Sex with Fi.
>>726001181Xenoblade 3D is much more competent than people say it is. The full, Original Wii game is there. Nothings removed. Plus, you get a sweet model viewer (something every game needs by the way). The graphics look a little uglier than usual, but the game still retains the original (superior) Pre-Definitive Edition art style. Framerate isn't that bad either, although I won't pretend the game's performance is on par with the Wii's.Also, the Captain Toad game is great on the 3DS. It was practically made for the system, frankly.
>>726000946legends had good content but the game ran like ass. the switch version is the ultimate version of hyrule warriors
>>726000946The 3DS had a resolution of 400 x 240. It was lower than the fucking PSP.
>>726000946This one was pretty great
>>726001570>i calculate an 83% probability that your perenium needs stimulating
>>726001965God that's fucking hot.
>>726001781It ran fine on tve "New" models. Stable 30FPS.
>>726001926This was one of the worst ports. Ran like ass no matter what 3DS version you possessed.
>>726002396with or without emotion?
>>726003685Without until with.
Smash 4 was a fine port, much better than Brawl
>>726003762probably for the best
>>726003685I wish she had emotions in Skyward Sword, the dramatic scene in which she tells Link that her memories of him are her most precious data rings super fucking hollow considering she never establishes an emotional connection with him and just vomits percentages at him the entire game, there were small chances for her to display a bit more emotion like with the simp robot but the game squanders all of them, Ghirahim has more of a presence because he actually displays emotions even though he's also a sword.
>>726004484and?
