[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Wrath of Cortex is such a joke
>>
Better than It's about time, for sure
>>
This game is the definition of mediocrity
>>
>>726023678
The game was fine. I don't get the hate. It was the the last traditional Crash game during that time.
>>
>>726027747
>absolutely abhorrent character models
>Coco levels are actual dogshit (gee, I sure love being forced to play a character who's SLOWER and LESS NIMBLE than the main protag!)
>uninspired rehash of Warped but with eve worse gimmick levels somehow
WotC defenders are actually low IQ.
>>
>>726027747
>The game was fine. I don't get the hate
>90% of the game is just vehicles, and most of them play like shit.
>most of the platform stages transitions into a vehicle segment
>Coco plays like shit
>shit graphics that are somehow worse than the Naughty Dog games
>you fight the same boss (Crunch) five times with a new gimmick, with old bosses being repurposed as stage obstacles
>forgettable music.
>fucking monkey bars slows the player down.
>atrocious load times on the PS2 version
If this is your definition of fine, then you're fucking retarded
>>
>>726027094
it's probably one of the clearest examples of a 5/10 game
>>
>>726024656
fuck no, IaB has horrible level design, bad plot, bad characters, bad redesigns and a lot more of problems, but at least is playable, physics in WoC ruin the whole game and playing as Coco is a pain in the ass
>>
>>726023678
Its quite fun, 00s-core, a banging soundtrack, and a neat premise (Crunch), more faithful than IAT.
Seethe more, Better than 4
>>
I hate the models so much. Isn't there a rom hack that fixes them?
>>
>>726033489
>>726024656
I can get thinking twinsanity is better but WoC is a 4/10 game.
Is like thinking sonic boom is better than generations
>>
>>726034617
Crash 4 aint no Sonic Generations, faggot.
>>
>>726030848
>>726032806

Had more fun with WoC then Crash 4 desu
>>
whens the decompile so we can fix it giving coco bigger tiddies?
>>
>>726035760
me too, you're still foolish
>>
>>726032806
>forgettable music.
Shit take.
https://youtu.be/bkC64SnDX_E?list=RDbkC64SnDX_E
>>
>Literally got filtered by a game meant for children
>>
>>726023678
woc is a piece of shit, only because it looks like 3 it doesn't make it good innany capacity, i still remember how exited i was when i discovered that there was a new crash game coming to ps2, i was wondering how they could surpass the master pieces that were the original trilogy with all the power of the ps2, only to be disappointed by how ugly it looked, somehow it look worse than fucking ps1 games, and also how it tried so hard to be Crash 3 and failed so miserable, everyone complains how 3 added a bunch of vehicle levels but at least a lot of them were fun, in Woc every single vehicle level suck fucking ass, those are not fun in any capacity, and on top of that they made Coco playable in the regular platform levels, that's what we wanted, doesn't it? welll fuck you, Coco is fucking useless! she doesn't get any power up and her only attack is fucking pathetic!!! why bother to making her playable if she is gonna sucks so fucking much?!?! this game was a big ass disappointed, i have a lot more to say about this pile of dogshit but i have better things to do than talking about shit!! fuck you and evert person that defend this shit!!
>>
L O A D I N G . . .



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.