[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1763303352451657.jpg (500 KB, 1920x1080)
500 KB
500 KB JPG
Damn... what the fuck happened?

How are chinese games doing so well now compared to the western ones?
>>
>f2p sloppa
You go your answer
>>
>>726031725
It's free retard
>>
Well in this case they paid alot for advertisement and paid every streamer to play it too.
But china has been releasing quality type games the whole year. Back to the dawn and wandering sword for example were really good. Imo they Def are overtaking Japan, who just release recycled jrpgs and Nintendo games,which ofc will always still have a market despite the quality being shit for ages
>>
doesn't your image say it does poorly against it's competition? not even on number one spot
>>
>top seller
>it's free
>>
The place is filled to the brim with....BRAZILIANS! Horrible place to be. They're insufferable.
>>
>>726031725
Because there's 6677876545682557855457844368 Chinese people.
>>
>>726032048
Steam counts top sellers based on revenue, not copies sold. Which is why csgo2 is no.1. most of the time because of selling skins
>>
>>726032228
This is for steam. Chinks have their own server. It's mostly thirdies like BRs, slavs and SEAnigs.
>>
>>726031725
>players
Bethesda-tier metric. Starfield had a lot more
>players



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.