>>726456997
>burn-in
no thanks. I can see it being worth it for a handheld or console, but for a PC you have to do shit like hiding your taskbar and making sure not to keep your tabs up for too long to slow down the inevitable burn-in
>works on my machine
good for you, shill

Probably

>>726456997

>Beta testing

I work at a vfx place, we have ~6 LG tvs we bought 2 years ago, $10000 a piece, no burnin on any of them. 2 of the same tvs from a few more generations ago, maybe just before covid, no burnin.
Mind you these get used I'd say for an hour a week, and they are the top spec tvs, so caveat emptor

>>726456997
>can't play anything with too many static elements
>can't idle with the screen on without turning on a screen saver
>>can't play for too long in general
it's quite a tedious piece of tech, and no matter how vigilant you are, it'll likely still get burned in <5 years

>>726456997
Oled are for people with a lot of disposable income.

people getting paid to post about oled burnin on a samoan virgin support group is one of those things that always surprises me

>>726458539
Do you have a single fact to back that up?

>>726458714
The manufacturers.
The thousands of written and video reviews.
The fact that OLEDs come with built-in utilities to mitigate burn-in.

>>726457302
>>works on my machine
>good for you, shill
these two lines evoke immense dread. how many times have you had this same conversation? indeed, oled does not fit your use case

>>726458539
none of the tvs playing video game content have ever burned in in rtings' burn in tests

>>726456997
Not if you make heavy use of VRR technology
Enjoy ur random flickering

>>726461675
I'm starting to question if VRR is even worth it.

>>726458539
>5 years
The joke is that since Oled threads began popping up on /v/ years ago this claim changes all the time. I was there when people said 6 months, then one year, then 3 years. Now it is a vague "less than 5". This comes from the fact that in real world use cases it is pretty much impossible to tell unless someone is one of the extreme cases. There was a dude posting a video on r*ddit the other day who had their entire Fortnite hud burned in because all he played in the last two years is that game on max brightness. Meanwhile I play different games 45 hours a week for 3.5 years now and there is no visible issue (yet heh).
But I do agree with the drawbacks even if the claims are always much worse than in real life. Static elements aren't a severe issue unless you "play" the exact same content all the time. What I really hate is how oled manufacturers hide cruicial information and most of the info out there is hearsay (aside from the RTINGS tests which are ultimately skewed because they blast the same content).
On the side of Oled there is the fact if these would burn in so fast and bad as people claim there would be an outrage instead of a small amount of claims you can find on the web. On the other side since Oled is more expensive it is very likely most users replace it because they see anything noticeable AND the real world use case for most people is not hardcore gaming all day.

>>726458691
More like people getting paid to shill for oleds. It's a flawed and shitty "technology".

>display tech thread

Short version: IPS despite its flaws just works and best for gayming activities
OLED fags are unironic shills

>still can't buy a decent ips mini led monitor
Fuck this gay country

>>726456997
Fuck no

>>726463150
How come?

>>726456997
Burn in isnt a problem if you just have a screensaver even just a blacks screen

Poorfags just repeat burnin burnin to feel better about not being able to afford oled

worth every fucking penny
REMINDER
>everyone shitting on OLED has never tried one
>everyone who owns one says they can never go back
do with that information what you will.

>>726458539
The very occasional screen/brightness flickering is the worst, I cannot believe people actually eat this shit up lmao.

>>726463675
this anon has never owned an oled or had one of the very first models from ages ago.
neither my tv or monitor, both oled, played thousands of hours of games on each, flicker is the single biggest non issue of all oled complaints.

>>726463615
what about the windows taskbar?

>>726463740
for me it's
>IPS + OLED
>taskbar only on the IPS
>turn OLED off when not playing a game or watching something on it
>enjoy the best quality display for media without worry
disclaimer I don't play the same games for thousands of hours with the same HUD, I wouldn't do this if I still played mmo's for example

>>726463740
It havent burned in for me. Just enable screensaver so the screen goes black when you go take a piss or go eat or fall asleep or whatever

Oleds look very fucking good, I tried to use an IPS monitor with local dimming at first, but the haloing around anything in dim scenes drove me insane, so I returned it and got an OLED instead. I had the same misgiving about not wanting to babysit it, but three years down the line I just use it almost like any other monitor, I just have it set to a black background and I have my taskbar on my secondary monitor, but I use my browser on it all the time (I'm typing this on it right now) and don't even bother to minimize it when I'm not using it anymore, still no burn in. I understand that's probably because of the pixel cleaning that the monitor does every so often, so I've probably lost overall brightness, but I can't tell just from looking.
That said, it WILL burn in eventually, OLEDs are eventual e-waste, so they're probably not for you if you don't want to deal with that eventually or you plan on using it for like a decade. They do look very good though.

>>726463869
Btw i only use one single monitor, not a multimonitor setup

If you use an oled as a secondary monitor where it just displays the exact same content for 12 hours without break then maybe u would have an issue i dont know

>>726463869
>>726463821
good to know
I was mainly worried about when I use assorted software for extended periods of time, but I could just get in the habit of using F11 whenever I don't need to look at multiple windows

No, because I'm not spending $600 on a fucking computer monitor.

>>726456997
I've put 7000 hours on mine of general desktop / gaming use. All I've done to protect it is have the display turn off after 5 minutes of inactivity. No burn in so far. When it eventually does burn in I'll buy another to replace it. No going back to LCD.

>>726464003
it's one of the items I use for the most hours out of my day every single day. are you a casual or something?
I've gotten enough use out of mine in 1.5 years that if my kid smashed it with a toy tomorrow I would feel I got my moneys worth per hour.

>>726464154
>are you a casual or something
not him but I still have a 60Hz display lmao, idk what I was smoking when I got it but I'd feel bad changing it now since it still works perfectly

>>726464987
>60hz
absolutely disgusting, you're spiritually a consolefag I hope you know. why the fuck do you only have one monitor anyway?

>>726463729
You have no standards.

>>726465092
>You have no standards.
TOP FUCKING KEK, says the faggot using subpar display technology

File: 47c0edb4f8e7eb20e3c91e838(...).jpg (9 KB, 255x253)

9 KB JPG

>>726465023
>why the fuck do you only have one monitor anyway
I'm in a small apartment and I don't have place for a second monitor on my desk area

>>726457302
I've had mines for 3 years with HDR and digital vibrance cranked up to 100 and got no burn in. Any decent oled comes with panel refresh.

>>726465310
sorry anon you're gonna make it one day

>>726458009
it's not beta testing, the tech is a known quantity and the flaws aren't possible to overcome
you need to use a different tech if you don't want flicker and burn-in and oled's "specific brand of ghosting" that totally isn't "regular ghosting"

File: od-transition-max-refresh(...).jpg (13 KB, 390x258)

13 KB JPG

>>726456997
They still have
>flickering with the refresh rate (picrel)
>burn-in
>cucked maximum brightness
>automatic brightness cucking
so no

File: 1758918951063810.jpg (44 KB, 635x473)

44 KB JPG

>tfw I have an IPS -with- burn in
>Worst of both worlds

>>726456997
Depends what you mean by "worth it" and on what content you actually intend to view on it. If you're also going to use it for work (as in, the 8h a day kind of work) then the screen is going to get raped by burn-in within the year. Is that worth it to you? I guess you have to decide based on your own sensibilities. If you're actually going to use it JUST for games and not work, then it also depends on how much you play and what kinds of games you play as well. If you play a lot of different games but don't play any one in particular for a very long time, it's going to be fine. If you have a favorite / staple game that you play for hours every day, then the screen is still going to get raped with game UI burn-in within the year. The kind of games you play is also going to matter. If the games you play have prominent, permanently-displayed UIs then that's obviously going to be much more burn-in prone (various strategy games, city builders, factory builders, certain RPGs and MMORPGs, etc.).

So it's basically all heavily dependent on what you do and how much you personally care about burn-in. The optimal use case for OLED monitors is basically playing full-screen video and full-screen 3D adventure, console-like games. Things beyond that will tend to have static UI elements to some degree and will rape the screen eventually. Keep in mind that burn-in is cumulative, like if you display the same image for 8h a day it doesn't matter whether it's for 8h continuously or you take a break every 30 minutes and such. Any time you have anything static on screen, it contributes to that element burning in.

>>726461817
It ensures perfect visual smoothness without tearing, so yeah it's an absolute game changer for vidya.

>>726465446
>>726465579
post the models you own or fuck off
REMINDER
>everyone shitting on oled doesn't own one
>everyone who has one says they can never go back
do with that information what you will.

>>726465435
thanks, I'm trying to move to a bigger place but the housing situation is beyond fucked where I live

>>726465765
You probably have brown eyes so you dont experience they eye raping phenomenon. Just go to rtings on ANY oled and look up the pixel transitions from rgb 0/0/0 to rgb 32/32/32.

Also nobody fucking measures per-pixel deviations that only really exist on OLEDs but not on IPS which basically destroy fine detail gradation. There is a reason that photography fags stood with calibrated IPS screen technology.

File: 1734879003331.jpg (64 KB, 800x600)

64 KB JPG

>>726456997
If you really want an OLED use it as a second monitor and only for movies and games it's just not worth if you're at your PC for 8-12 hours a day while using it as your main monitor since then it'll get fucked in no time at all.

>>726456997
if you buy a good OLED now it will last you enough time for first microLED monitors to hit the market

>>726466442
is that LotF?

>>726456997
no, monitors are the wrong use case for oled

>>726465348
>digital vibrance cranked up to 100
The fuck

>>726466642
What?

>>726465446
There is zero oled flicker if you dont use vrr or use it with a sensible framecap

>>726466708
You mean in the nvidia control panel?

>>726466792
Yes it helps bigly with comp shooters and I like movies better with it

>>726465446
LCD gets VRR flicker too lol

>>726466813
You know 50% is default right? Anything above 75% makes everything look like a circus candy shop. But yeah i guess it would make enemies easier to spot in shooters

I still dont know why nvidia doesnt let us set this as a per game setting

>>726466732
There is ALWAYS OLED flicker if you display a dark grey with rgb values 32/32/32

>>726466876
My eyes adjusted to it pretty quickly from all the CS and Valorant I play to where 50% looks washed out. Movies look better to me at 100 but some games I'd have to turn it down to 80 like Cyberpunk cause I can't see shit otherwise with how bright and vibrant they already are.

>>726465981
>Also nobody fucking measures per-pixel deviations that only really exist on OLEDs
This was really noticeable on my first VR headset, the OG Oculus Rift. It has OLED screens and you would see weird patterns and dots at low brightness levels because of uneven response at low signal levels.

File: Screenshot_20251121-103040.png (1008 B, 285x285)

1008 B PNG

Display this on your OLED and it will flicker with the refreshrate. Made worse if VRR is active. Its RGB 32/32/32

>>726466973
You sound like you have broccoli hair and an Adderall prescription

>>726467173
https://rgbcolorpicker.com/

File: Mole that can't burrow in(...).jpg (290 KB, 2106x2139)

290 KB JPG

>>726467192
Vyvanse nigga

>>726467230
I tried Vyvanse once and didn't feel anything. It was 70mg so I'm still just confused about that experience. It was brand name as well.

File: file.png (3.04 MB, 1024x1536)

3.04 MB PNG

>>726464691

File: Screenshot_20251121-103901.png (3 KB, 684x639)

3 KB PNG

Here RGB 50/50/50, will probably still flicker on OLEDs. Ofc depends on your brightness settings.

>>726467314
You might have ADHD then, it's sub perceptual and weirdly calming for me on 60. Vyvanse is incredibly smooth thoughever and I've had to take 120mg to get cracked out which just wasnt enjoyable. I had a horrific cocaine habit through high school so maybe i just fucked up my dopamine and norepinephrine systems or something. Either way its changed my life for the better and quelled any impulses I have.

>>726467464
Good to hear anon. But assuming you're American (which seems likely considering Vyvanse is less common outside the states) you're still staying up late. Get enough sleep nigga.

File: Untitled video - Made wit(...).webm (545 KB, 1280x720)

545 KB WEBM

>>726467173
>Display this on your OLED and it will flicker with the refreshrate. Made worse if VRR is active. Its RGB 32/32/32

>>726463821
This isn't the first time I've heard of dual monitor setups and I have to ask how the fuck does that look in practice
Do you have a corner desk where you can rotate to face a completely different monitor easily (and move your kb+m over)? Do you have good monitor arms and shuffle the monitors around all the time?

>>726456997
Why is oled meant to be better visually? I've never had an issue with my ips monitors and I think the only thing I've heard that they do better is darks.

>>726467503
I work night shifts b got school in 6 hours

>>726467505
This cant be captured by an average itoddlers camera. Also if you are insensitive to flicker then it could be fine, but not everybody has brown eyes

>>726467580
it simply wasn't flickering

>>726465730
>If the games you play have prominent, permanently-displayed UIs then that's obviously going to be much more burn-in prone (various strategy games, city builders, factory builders, certain RPGs and MMORPGs, etc.).
This is what gets me. People say "hurr just use it for games and it won't burn in!"
I don't play a new FOTM every week, I have a couple of games I play regularly and these indeed happen to have very static very permanent large UI elements. I don't disagree that OLED is probably fine if you only watch movies and play a variety of games casually, but I don't get fags who claim it's just perfect and burn-in-proof for everyone.

>>726467598
It is imperceptible but still eye raping.

>>726467617
I play games . I don't go out of my way to protect the monitor. I use it the same as I did with my LCD.
I've had this screen for around 3 years now without burn in. I run games in HDR mode so the brightness is at 100%.
I was expecting to see burn in already. It hasn't happened. People on /v/ are drama queens. The loudest are the ones who have never owned.

>>726467598
Try displaying even lower rgb values and see if it ever becomes visibly flickery
https://rgbcolorpicker.com/

>>726467656
>your monitor is flickering
it wasn't flickering
>it was flickering but humans can't see it
lol shut up retard

>>726467742
I get flicker on an occasional static load screens. Never in game. Never on desktop

>>726467763
You deserve your eye cancer then. Ignorance is not a virtue

>>726467825
What OLED do you have flicker on?

File: od-transition-max-refresh(...).jpg (13 KB, 390x258)

13 KB JPG

>>726467837
On every fucking OLED you retard

>>726467873
What OLED do YOU have flicker on?

>>726467837
Just because its not visible doesnt mean that your eye muscles arent spazzing out.

i fell for the meme
>get it
>it's not bright at all
>the picture is hardly better
>have to turn it off for a minute every 4 hours to protect it

>>726467914
my brain is spazzing out on you telling me my screen is flickering when you don't know what screen I have and I can't see it

>>726467893
I had an Alienware AW3423DWF ok retard and I had to sell this piece of shit at a huge loss. It was raping my eyes ok, Im a rape victim here that lost his money too

>>726468008
so you're a bitter faggot who bought a shit monitor and thinks everyone else also has a shit monitor
lol

>>726468008
AW3423DWF has 165Hz refresh rate. That means that the flicker is at 165Hz and sensitive boys like me get raped by that.

File: 297204f743e67e1c97a09ffab(...).png (95 KB, 385x337)

95 KB PNG

My oled monitor randomly turns off. Apparently its a common issue, but none of the jewtube faggots mentioned it.

>>726468057
you have some protection setting enabled.
mine does the screen refresh on hibernation, not forced every 2 hours or whatever

>>726467727
You say this but that guy making burn-in videos on the OLED monitor he uses for his daily office work "torture test" (lol) started noticing the first subtle signs of panel rape after like 3 months and they've gotten worse since then. The guy shows video evidence. So do I trust that guy, or do I trust some random chucklefuck on /v/ who could very well be lying, or alternatively could just be a half-blind retard who can't tell the burn-in is there anyway? Burn-in is definitely the kind of thing that normalfags would be completely incapable of noticing until it got REALLY bad, so can I believe that you are sufficiently discerning to even be able to tell? Maybe you just aren't.

>>726468041
fuck you btw

File: _91408619_55df76d5-2245-4(...).jpg (54 KB, 976x850)

54 KB JPG

if these monitors burn in why don't they put cooling fans inside?

File: Screenshot_20251121-111015.png (145 KB, 1080x609)

145 KB PNG

.
Im right

>>726468404
I just spray some water on mine every once in a while

dont buy oled

>>726468550
This shit is like worrying about EMFs snd wifi. Which you should btw, you should consider those things and their very real negative biological effects. But most people wont notice it at all.

with no one able to buy a GPU anymore, surely the price of monitors will go down from the lack of demand since less people will be making new rigs, right?

>>726456997
Are mini led tvs any good? I'm afraid of burn in when it comes to oled.

>>726456997
What about mini led?

>>726465348
>works on my machine

>>726468234
I don't give a fuck who you trust. I'm writing my experience. take it or leave it. It's really not important to me what type of monitor you have so you do you.

>>726469778
>>726469951
Mini led can be great, but you have to do some research. Check some reviews and see how well its full array local dimming works. Some companies cheap out and use less dimming zones, which results in more blooming and light bleeding in. But even a shittier one will have better black levels than most regular led monitors/TVs. The more expensive ones with good FALD and HDR will look about 80-90% of the way to an oled. But you'll need to wait like 10 years for micro led to not cost $100k per TV to get comparable color quality to oled without the burn in.

>>726469951
Im sus about miniled too because their zones dim but I dont know at what frequency, no reviewer seems to test this, they all test at 100% brightness. Usually its pwm dimming so potentially cancerous. But they do get really bright with no automatic brightness limiting and some have really large gamuts too with decent accuracy.

EX321UX seems decent but Im sus about its local dimming. There have been some bad reports, but something was fixed with firmware updates. I dont know if its enough.

>>726471013
If you turn its local dimming off then flickering is fine because its confirmed 4000 Hz pwm, so no eye strain. But this makes it a around 700 nits screen with shitty contrast, raised black levels. Pick your poison it seems.

>>726471440
Im also worried about differential degradation of local dimming zones. Not as bad as OLED, but LCDs too are known for slowly degrading their backlight over time. This cant be as easily fixed as on LCDs with a single backlight.

>>726456997
Stick with IPS, pray for QDEL

File: 1.jpg (84 KB, 906x1033)

84 KB JPG

>>726456997
Tandem Oled are known for withstanding burn-in better because these are brighter while using less energy. QD-Oled still has better colors and overall better image quality since Tandem is still essentially just a glorified WOled with an extra layer but are better at resisting burnin.

>>726468404
They have started using heatsinks but no cooling fans yet. It would probably be too noisy and costly. Also remember these TV's are really thin and meant to be put on walls, where would you even put the fan?

>>726467727
What games? How do you normally use your LCD? My post is literally about how specific games and usage patterns are terrible and the best reply you thought to post was "I play games ."

>CRTs are good because pixels only light up for an instant, and then fade away before the next update
>OLEDs are bad because the pixels aren't on 100%, there's a small dip between updates
Which is it retards, do you want 100% constant illumination or pulse illumination

>>726472334
100% constant illumination. Im not a brown eyed crt shill

>>726472334
100% illumination also more closely resembles the original material. Something that doesnt flicker irl should also not flicker when played back.

>>726472334
>do you want 100% constant illumination or pulse illumination
Why not both? Regular LCDs with strobing backlights can do that.

>>726472525
How is a strobing backlight constant illumination

>>726472549
It can do both.

>>726456997
You have been shilling this garbage daily for what seems years now, what are you getting out of this you retarded schizo?

oled is amazing if you just use it to watch movies or play games. i dont like it for work because of eye strain and burn in. some oleds, usually older models, also have weird issues so you have to be able to test them first. all the tards in this thread talking about flicker, brightness, or other weird are just dumb fags.

The perfect pixel is a pixel of integrity. It illuminates or darkens at exactly the right time and if it flickers it only does so faithfully as commanded by its digital commander. Pixels are supposed to be transparent, merely a messenger

File: 1763325564531849.jpg (101 KB, 1080x1080)

101 KB JPG

>>726473290
No unruly pixel shall inherit the throne.
Begone, ye fools!

>>726473430
One thing I forgot to mention tho are environment light sensors. You need to have them in your monitor and they SHOULD be used to impact pixels color.

>>726472273
It's my main monitor. I use it for everything. I use it no different to what I used the LCD for

>>726456997
no. meme technology. ABL sucks donkey dick, brightness is shit, the display literally burns in the rest of the pixels to make the image uniform (i.e. it permanently lowers screen brithness after every use), etc.

this thread is just people who haven't used something telling people who have used something that they watched a youtube video so they know best

>>726462317
anon, my basic bitch ips monitor is 15 fucking years old. your meme oled will never match that
>>726463297
ips sucks but it's the least sucky thing we have
we need CRTs back

>>726456997
OLED is only worth it on a TV. OLED monitors are mid. I have a lg g3 65 and 27gs95. The quality difference is really noticeable.

>>726472334
CRT flicker is actully one of the chief complaints levied at them, and it's fixed by upping the refresh rate
oMEMEs aren't supposed to flicker at all since there's no electron gun scanning, you stupid sperg

>>726473290
>>726473430
Keep buying high refresh oleds and eventually we will get 1000hz displays, which have better motion clarity than even CRT

>>726474474
The entire reason people still care about CRTs these days is the lack of motion blur inherent to all sample-and-hold displays
Literally everything else a CRT does has been done better by LCDs for ages now, even shitter older ones from a decade ago

>>726474701
>1000hz display
>games struggle to maintain 30fps
there's no point in it moron

>>726474701
We're at, what, 700Hz now?
I wonder if we're reaching the realistic limits of the technology right now (similar to how IPS was stuck at 160-ish Hz for years and barely gets to 240Hz nowadays) or if 1000+Hz oleds are genuinely around the corner.

I might actually upgrade from my 240Hz monitor if those arrive. I'm not an esports player but it'd be nice to have sub-milisecond visual response times just for visual clarity

>>726474836
crts didn't have per pixel deviations and the flickering was constant for all colors, not just low brightness colors because it can't be driven at low voltages

>>726474956
Fair

OLED for movies, IPS for gaming

microled

I have been waiting for a non chinkslop mini led for almost a year
Might just say fuck it and get a normal IPS until they figure out microled

>>726475160
What if i want both.

Im using gamma 2.4 in my slightly shaded room btw.

>>726474854
Dunning kruger idiot

>>726475428
Compromise.

File: deus ex IPS vs OLED.mp4 (3.65 MB, 1920x1080)

3.65 MB MP4

reminder

>>726475602
>zoomer accusing others of lacking knowledge uses words whose meaning he doesn't know
like pottery

>>726475908
Works on my machine (TN).

Does TN even have any major disadvantages anymore?
>muh colors
It's not 2014 anymore, modern TNs look just fine as long as you're not a graphics designer doing color grading
>muh viewing angles
Matters a lot on laptops, or for side monitors in a multi-monitor setup. So it does reduce versatility. But it's functionally irrelevant for the primary desktop monitor that will be centered directly in front of you.

You can get a TN monitor today that has
>no IPS glow
>very nice blacks even without miniled/zoned backlights
>no VA ghosting
>no danger of burn-in
>refresh rates rivalling the best OLEDs, if you care
Really feels like going back to TN is the closest thing to a no-compromise monitor nowadays

>>726465981
no idea what brown eyes have to do with anything but not my problem lmao

>>726457302
burn-in hasn't been an issue for oled since before covid, you fucking luddite

>>726477879
I have an ~15 years old TN screen with 1680 resolution and an analog vga connection on my spare PC and after color calibration with a colorimeter it still looks pretty fucking good.

>>726478825
Really? Prove it. Post it.

>>726478825
I remember color space used to be a pretty big issue back in the day, IPS prided itself on having a much bigger colorspace while TNs didn't even always cover the bare minimum sRGB space
Also not everybody has a colorimeter. I also had a TN about 13 years ago or so and it was pretty visibly ugly

>>726477879
>Does TN even have any major disadvantages anymore?
That they're not being produced any more in any great quantities.

>>726465765
This. I own a PG27UCDM since release, love it and will never go back to TN/VA/IPS.
>>726465446
>>726465981
Post the model you own faggot.

>>726479167
There are new models coming out semi-regularly.
What's not being produced as far as I'm aware are budget office tier monitors, since IPS has basically replaced TN there. But for fast refresh rate gaming monitors there's still a TN market.

>>726478930
Cant be assed right now to do it, sorry

This thread is giving me Down syndrome, I’ve had a 240hz oled for like 3 years and never noticed or even heard of this flickering shit. People complaining about burn in are probably turning off their screen clean features or something or are just poor and don’t own the superior display

>>726456997
I'm never buying a IPS display again, I bought a high end one back in 2018 that all the reviews of it insured that it has good black levels (for an IPS) but it was fucking shit, it's actually startling how bad it is especially next to the OLED I got earlier this year.

>>726475908
good thing I don't play games in the complete dark like some cave dweller

>>726480459
Cope and seethe, playing on an OLED in pure darkness is kino of the absolute highest order

>>726479939
I've seen the flickering but its literally so fucking subtle even the exceedingly rare times it does actually happen that I legitimately laugh to myself at the absolute absurdity of anons in every OLED thread crying about it when they've clearly never laid eyes on an OLED outside of a best buy TV section
it simply couldn't be more of a non-issue, to the point where anyone mentioning it is immediately outed as a sour grapes poorfag

>>726456997
Stealth marketing thread

File: 1762406019267929.jpg (876 KB, 2560x1440)

876 KB JPG

>726480719
someone make an OLED edit of this because the same thing applies

>>726480554
it's probably the only way it would be bearable at all, with my IPS it would blind me even at the lowest brightness

File: crosshairs-stroboscopic-a(...).png (162 KB, 450x285)

162 KB PNG

CRTsisters, what do we do?

Cheapest 4k 32" QD-OLEDs are around 650€, AOC AG326UD for example.
But I'm waiting for 4k tandem WOLEDs, they should get announced on the CES.

>>726480879
OLED is the best in all lighting conditions unless you have no blinds with the sun in your window directly hitting the screen or some shit (which is obviously an absurd scenario)

>>726481052
when I was a kid my parents used to have the tv set up exactly like that, watching a dark movie like Harry Potter was infuriating because I couldn't see shit

File: Rivera-Campbell-shake_(cr(...).jpg (183 KB, 730x1006)

183 KB JPG

>>726481659
kek my grandpa would still have his like this to this day if I didn't get him a black curtain for when we watch apecollide today on Sundays

Just got an AOC miniled hdr monitor, but setting up the hdr is a bitch. Everything's always washed up, wtf

>>726483654
>fell for the HDR on a non OLED meme
jej

>>726456997
Yes, but make sure you get one that has anti-burnin features. I have an LG C1 that looks great and has anti-burnin.

I want an oled. 1440p. I play in the dark all the time.

>>726483654
HDR support across the board is ass, I suggest you use something like AutoActions to enable the Windows HDR setting when you launch a game you intend to play in HDR and turn it off when you exit.

>>726476027
>sperg starts blabbering about zoomers out od nowhere
Im probably older than you and you dont understand monitor tech

>>726463670
I'm interested but do they last as long? I'm not even memeing about burn in like, what's the real, if any, downside?
What's the best oled brand?

File: fluke afer hundreds of di(...).png (21 KB, 158x149)

21 KB PNG

Don't be so eager to throw away what works. Make it better. Use a custom colour profile.
Don;t make threads. Don't spread your infection.
If someone tries to sell you on the idea what you have is inadequate tell them theyre not worth anything, their view isn't yours, never will be. Defend what has been good enough to you to be yours.

>>726477879
Oled is the no compromise panel type for gaming. TNs are cheap and have low latency and at least they're not pig disgusting VA.

you're getting immaculate picture quality at a huge cost. If you can afford it go for it

File: file.png (203 KB, 311x329)

203 KB PNG

I'd like a high-refresh OLED with BFI but they're expensive so until then, it's CRT for me
specifically, this one

>>726477879
I agree and I hate how TN = bad is pushed so hard. They really have some of the least actual disadvantages and have the most mature and reliable tech. All the other panel types are flawed in actively worse ways and TNs problems are barely problems if you set them up right.

File: Screenshot 2025-03-30 144722.png (489 KB, 544x1411)

489 KB PNG

OLEDs are a scam.

>>726485619
I will never, EVER see 100% srgb as that is consoomer bullshit that the human eye can't even perceive. 80% srgb is all anyone ever needs.

>>726477879
>You can get a TN monitor today that has
ok which one

>>726457302
I get new monitors faster than burn in would become a thing, so your complaints don't apply to me. My monitor also comes with a 3 year warranty that covers burn in.

>>726486449
>Has color blindness
>Hurr durr colors aren't real

>>726457302
burn in is practically a myth

>>726486875
>>726487420
Not to mention they all come with 3 year burn in warranty, which means it's near guaranteed to not burn in within 3 years, and likely 4-5 because they absolutely do not want to replace your $1000+ product if they can avoid it.

If they set the warranty at 3 years, they're pretty confident it won't burn in before that plus a lot of wiggle room.

>>726480554
Do you have a table lamp to see the keyboard and the mouse?

I actually like OLED on Steam Deck. Thinking about upgrading monitor
Also Steam Deck OLDE gives me 3D illusion for some reason (maybe it indicates a problem with my eyes.)

>>726467379
using an AI image to support you just means that no real human actually thinks this.

>>726487585
>4-5 years
>$1000
For people seething at OLEDs, $1000 is 2 years worth of salary.

>>726487293
90% of crts never got close to 100% srgb and yet they have outstanding color to this day.

>>726481024
what

>>726485705
The compromise with OLED is that you have to consume the correct content or it will kill itself within a few years
>>726486224
TN genuinely used to look awful, they've improved significantly in years but everyone already learned that "TN bad, IPS good" and it never recovered. TN also used to be "the fast panel type"

File: 1686597448128380.jpg (2.75 MB, 1676x1466)

2.75 MB JPG

Text fringeing makes it worthless for surfing 4chan if it's not 4K and those are way too pricy.

>>726466813
>movies
>buy oled
>destroy it with digital vibrance

File: 1726587422559905.jpg (16 KB, 430x319)

16 KB JPG

>>726487585
>changing a monitor every 4-5 years
Incredible how far larping poorfags are willing to go.

CRT fags need to be rounded up

terrible as a main monitor . enjoy your burn in
oled is never good for games the brightness and darkness levels arent calibrated properly so every dark scene will be cant see shit tier and every brightness scene is a flashbang.
there's constant shilling for oled, ive had oled for 10+ years my first oled tv had genshin health bar permanently burnt in, any static hud elements will burn in. get ips monitor for main monitor and only use oled for movies

>>726457302
People saying burn-in is a myth simply haven't tripped on a usage pattern which creates burn-in, or they are too dumb to notice. That said, I would rather coddle an OLED than go back to LCD. I know how to prevent issues now.

>>726488827
>buy a new GPU, CPU, mobo, RAM, etc every 4-5 years
>but keep the same shitty display through which to see all the effects of your upgrade
Low IQ jeet streetshitter.

>>726456997
Shill thread.

News Flash: OLED is SHIT.

>Blur
>Image softness
>Trying to do 1080p+ resolutions on a tiny fucking monitor
>Burn in
>The blacks are sooo deep!! Yeah and end up killing contrast
>Ovepriced

OLED is for phones, you massive retards. It's so you have a less power hungry screen that is also visible in strong outdoor daylight.

>>726489364
Or they are marketers.

>>726489364
coddling and having to tip toe around faulty self destructing hardware is the worst most uncomfortable experience in gaming
blacks are nice thats it and only in movies because games arent designed for pure blacks so literally any dark scene is a fucking abyss
searching around dark caves in a game with an oled is pure cancer
calibrating brightness with oled is pure cancer too
>slide the brightness slider until you can barely see a symbol
>.1 notches from the far left
>everything is too bright or too dark

File: Monke.jpg (75 KB, 947x727)

75 KB JPG

So is OLED only good for movies and TV? What about consoles gaming and not any sort of computer use? What's the best type of screen for specifically console gaming and movies? There's too many choices now.

>>726489649
You were responding to me, and everything you said was fucking retarded. Games aren't darker on OLED you idiot.

>>726489526
Hi retard

I'm never using non-self emissive displays ever again.

>>726457302
panels now have some surplus pixels that the user cant address that it uses to presumably move the screen around every now and then to mitigate burn in.

>>726489526
>The blacks are sooo deep!! Yeah and end up killing contrast
wow this is the dumbest thing ive ever read in my life.

what do you use? because it better be a VA panel because if youre running your cumcatch about contrast and using an ips im gonna laugh in your face as i blast my load inside your mother again

>>726489526
me when I have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about

>>726489649
>games arent designed for pure blacks so literally any dark scene is a fucking abyss
>searching around dark caves in a game with an oled is pure cancer
I play a lot of Thief FMs on a nice OLED and I can assure you that you're retarded.

>>726487731
I don't need to see my keyboard and mouse, but the light from the monitor is enough to not be in crippling darkness anyway

>>726489649
kek anti-oled larps from faggots who've never owned one are hilarious
just get a fucking job. if you care enough about video games to be on a video game board there's no excuse to not have one unless you're a thirdie

i have an OLED ultrawide and a mini-led AMVA TV
i prefer my TV the HDR gets brighter and i can play games with static ui for long sessions without having to stress that im doing permanent damage to my shit
the blacks are nearly the same too you just need to get one with plenty of local dimming zones

I use an oled tv as my daily monitor for programming, internet browsing, gaming, and TV with my gf and haven't had any burn in issues. 4k hdr oled is a godsend and anyone not using atleast one oled monitor, or in my case oled tv, is missing out at this point. Make sure to get a glossy screen, matte is for troglodytes and won't have colors that look as nice.

>>726474163
>old
That is the keyword here. One of the big mistakes in my life was to cling to monitors only to realize a much much better tech is out there for ages. I'm not even talking about just Oled. I used shitty old led monitors for ages and when they finally gave in I bought a new one only to realize I was ruining my eyesight for nothing.
Yes, your monitor will last for eternity. But your eye won't. You don't need to buy oled but I guarantee you could get a much better IPS replacement for cheap right now.

>>726467526
>Why is oled meant to be better visually?
Regular LCD pixels don't generate their own light, they have to be backlit--sort of like shining a flashlight behind colored strips of paper. Some LCD monitors have sophisticated configurations where each region of the screen has a separate backlight but you're still going to get light bleed if the picture has dark areas immediately adjacent to brighter ones. With OLED, each pixel is emitting its own light so there's no light bleed and dark areas can be truly dark even if adjacent to bright areas.

>>726474163
imagine using a monitor for 15 fucking years in a world where tech advances at the rate it does
and then proceeding to think it's a fucking own
I hate this thirdie broke faggot infested board so goddamn much
GUESS WHAT FAGGOT? even if OLED burnin didn't exist, I'd still be ready to upgrade in ~5 years because I'm not a broke faggot and tech gets better as years go by
same type of fucking retard who uses a 1060 3gb while posting fucking gigachads
you deserve to be fucking killed for using a 15 year old monitor and acting smug about it. I have infinitely more respect for even consolekeks than motherfuckers playing games at 1080p 60fps on pc in 2025

>>726467526
>I think the only thing I've heard that they do better is darks.
even VA does blacks/contrast better than IPS lol.

>>726456997
7713 hours on my oled, no problem for now

>>726470558
>take it or leave it
will leave it

>>726468404
You joke but temperature is actually a factor in how quickly these burn in I believe, at least I think the brightness limiting is required because the screen would otherwise overheat and get damaged.

The question is, why would they bother adding proper cooling if people just consoom more screen when it degrades anyway?

What do you guys think of the Alienware AW3425DWM, I know it's VA but it seems pretty good for the price for an ultrawide. I'm just about to buy it.

>>726495612
Heat density becomes the problem.

File: G5l0ueqXUAANp3C.jpg (337 KB, 1774x2297)

337 KB JPG

I've had an LG OLED 48' "monitor" (basically just a tv without the app bloatware) for over two years now with regular daily usage and no burn in at all

>>726456997
Yes, it's so close to perfect. Do not listen to the poorfags that cry about burn-in. By the time you see anything in 10 years, you'll be ready for an upgrade anyway.

>>726489526
>Blur
Stopped reading there, bad bait

>>726496938
I think curved UW displays are very niche and I would not want one for sure.
That model is 270€ at the moment so if that's your fetish why not. It's dirt cheap, you can always return it if you don't like it.
Just be aware of VRR flicker on this display.

>>726498074
21:9 isn't that niche anymore, a lot of people are buying them and a lot of games support it natively now. 32:9 is niche, I love it, but that's the point where it may be too much depending on your tastes.

>>726456997
I need your knowledge anons - should I turn on FreeSync Premium or it`s just meme technology?