Name one, just ONE good game /v/.
How come this board struggles with the notion that different people like different things and we literally parse information in different ways.
Sengoku Rance
Ah but that's easy. Resident Evil 4 (classic, not remake). It is the pinnacle of "good game" that everyone should agree with.
>>727504975It's subjective, so once I name some games I like as good, some anons will just get angry, so what's the point.
>>727504975Have you played "GOOD Game"?
>>727504975Tetris
>>727505090art is not subjective
Ai image? You can't even draw a stickman in paint? Dumb faggot
>>727504975did you ai generate a shitty mspaint comic?
Good Game 2: Gooder
>>727505090A game's quality is not entirely subjective. Your enjoyment of it is subjective but there is objective quality to products.I enjoy some games that are not particularly good, and I don't enjoy games that I can see are good. If you cannot make this simple distinction you are a low IQ brown.
>>727505057Because only my opinion matters and anyone else's does not.Real talk, it's just easy ragebait and it works every single time. It doesn't matter if it even is a good game to everyone that's ever existed, there's always going to be one person to say no and call you a ESL indian, and it just spirals down afterwards.
>>727504975Thief 1/2+fan missions, Doom 1/2+wads. A proper man doesn't need anything else.
>>727505172i can, but choose not to. the fact that it angers trannies like you is icing on the cake
>>727505258You literally can't You have no skills You have no grace
>>727505059It sucks.
>Pizza Tower>Lies of P>Unicorn Overlord>Pikmin 4 (emulated in 4k 60fps)>Bloodborne (emulated in 4k 60fps)>Black Souls II>Exp 33
>>72750521399.999999% of the retards on /v/ are literally incapable of making this distinction, I can tell that they aren't even trolling, they are simply incapable.
Super Mario World
>>727505290cope and seethe lmao
>>727504975FUCK YOU
>>727505132Art is art, your interpretation or opinion of it is subjective, or personal, if you will.
>>727505189i did and you should too
>>727504975Imagine slopping something this simple.
>>727505213That just means "good" is vague. I like games I enjoy for x reasons and that's it. Better metric.
>>727504975Silly anon, good games don't exist
>>727505059Can you stop pooping in threads?
>>727505423S O U L
>>727505532imagine taking 10 times the time for a worse result
>>727504975I have the perfect choice for this discussion
>>727505705AI slop is automatically the worst result
>>727504975Megaman Battle Network
>>727505725K I N OINO
>>727505308>GOOD>MEDIOCRE>GOOD>AMAZING>NO IDEA WTF THAT IS LOOKS LIKE RGG MAKER SHIT>BADpretty good list
>>727505797fuck missed unicorn overlord, that is also good
>>727505725Yes, noita is indeed shit
>>727504975Who the fuck says OoT isn't a good game?
>>727505308Solid choices apart from Unicorn Overlord
>>727505216I think it's that but also the fact that a lot of the posters here will pretend to be enlightened objectivists for calling a game shit while dismissing anyone who likes said game as emotional dipshits. For example: Ocarina of Time. A lot of people liked Ocarina of Time. Ocarina of Time has been improved on over time. This doesn't suddenly mean that Ocarina of Time was a bad game. Speedrunners discovering glitches by dissecting the game's code doesn't suddenly make it bad. But if you ask like 80% of the board here? Oh it's mid. Because the casuals liked it. Even though the target audience who would've been like 10 years old when that game released would be nearly 40 years old now. You were a hardcore gamer in the 5th grade? Or, and this one is fucking stupid, game A is bad because game B did [thing] better. As if the existence of game B invalidated game A. /v/ in general just has a really weird way of weighting gaming criticism where the more people like it, the harsher each criticism becomes. Regardless of what you think of Silksong, it's a little weird to say Silksong is bad because Reddit/ Tumblr/ Twitter/ etc likes it. What the fuck does that have to do with the game's quality? But then if a game inspires a lot of porn, then it's good by default. I've never played Stellar Blade. It looks okay. But I don't think I've ever once seen anyone discuss the mechanical game, characters, setting, music, or anything. Just the porn. And fine, enjoy the porn, but obviously those other things are not interesting enough to carry discussion. Meanwhile another game that might try similarly hard but doesn't inspire porn is either forgotten or hated. Looking at you Stranger of Paradise that vanished after it was released but was memed to high heaven when it was just ANGRY MAN HATES CHAOS.
>>727504975>Dark Souls>Devil May Cry 3>Sonic 3&K>Super Mario 64>Half Life 2Surely at least these games are universally agreed upon to be at least good, right?
>>727506040safe and gay list but yes
What is it about video games that draw the interest of people who don't like any video games?
>>727504975> Donkey Kong Country 2> Tetris> Disco Elysium> Baba is You> Civilization III
>>727504975OoT has always been shit.
>>727505423>that devilish smirk
>>727504975I am quite fond of Diablo 2. Many people say Diablo 1 is superior, but I enjoy Diablo 2 more.
>>727506035Your long-ass post reads very reasonably, BUT my opinion, which is the only one that matters, is contrary to it, so you do get completely dismissed : ^ )
>>727505057Modern outrage culture and the total lack of shame among zoomers has made this problem a thousand times worse
>>727506035FF Chaos is a good game, it was just assassinated by Timmy Tencent's EGS exclusivity.
>>727505749Glad you liked it. Don't miss on the sequel
>>727506461>Modern outrage cultureshut the fuck up, there is nothing modern about it, it was always like this hereif anything, it spilled from 4chan to the rest of the internet, not the other way around
>>727506571Modern outrage culture is a result of social media algorithms that are designed to get people mad and argumentative because the people behind said social media figured out ragebait generates the most engagement. And no, 4chan didn't start it, and 4chan wasn't originally like this either.
>>727505931I do.It's not worth playing, if you don't have nostalgia from playing it is a child.
>>727506538Fuck off niggershill. SOVL Game >>>>>> Dogshit Game 2: Electric Boogaloo
Why are Bad Game 1 fags so insecure? Bad Game 2 mogs it on every conceivable level.
>>727504975Starcraft
>>727505290>can draw a stickman but cant define what a woman is award
>>727506035for me the issue is retards saying its "the greatest game of all time and the bestest!!"
>>727504975>"Name one good game">Intentionally name a mid but obscure game they won't know, and would have a dispiriting time playing just to refute mehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I27pqsYferQ
>>727505423SOVL>>727504975soulless
Deus Ex Human Revolution
>>727505057
>>727505057Because at some point a shit-eater will be a shit-eater, regardless of subjective-ness of taste.
>>727505057Video games have objective metrics due to the way they're created.
>>727504975Elden Ring, as proven by the fact that subhuman videogame haters (nintendo fans) despise it evdn though they've never played it
>>727504975If you like the exact same "popular" game that every single other person likes your opinion is worth less than shit.
>>727507917Everyone likes breathing air, I guess that means you have to drown yourself now.
>>727507160So all leftists are autistic.
>>727504975Heroes of might and magic 3.
>>727505059Wtf I hate RE4 now
>>727504975Scribble it in MSPaint like a fucking man
>>727504975[GAME]
>>727505057Because not everything is purely subjective, despite how many post-modernists will claim that, and you can have bad taste and bad takes that are worth criticizing.When horrible shit gets popular, and good things get ignored, then the right thing to do is to call out and criticize the bad shit, or to create your own community where you shun the bad shit and try to cultivate your own culture and the things that you like.Half of the reason 4chan used to be good, was because people here were allowed to express such opinions without repercussions (aka going against a mainstream we didn't like), while in other places, people would get banned or shunned for not submitting to the lowest common denominator.Of course, the very things that used to make 4chan good, has ended up killing it, because Hiroshimoot refused to adapt to the changing face of the internet and its changing demographics. Now it's nothing more than shills, grifters, ragebait, negro and tranny porn, jeets and algorithm-driven zoomers who completely lack any kind of independent personality or unique experiences because their formative years were spent on 4 or 5 corporate websites. 4chan is like every other board now, and in many cases worse, because so much shit isn't filtered out.
>>727504975one, just ONE good game /v/
>>727506035>This doesn't suddenly mean that Ocarina of Time was a bad game.OOT is a high 8/low 9 out of 10It's criminal that we share a board with retards who think it is a top 5 video game in 2025.9
>>727509523I don't think Ocarina of Time is a 10/10. There were games that released in the same time period that I enjoyed far more, even if I'm more critical of them now. I'm more talking about the people that claim>LOLOL OoT was 6/10 and you just fell for marketingAnd then when you tell them to explain themselves, they say things that either came after years of refinements or was industry standard at the time. And I get it, contrarians and trolls, but I'd also invoke Poe's Law there because there are a fair amount of people who really think this way.
>>727509523No, it's a shit game, and was terribly outdated by the time it came out. Of course, if you were retarded enough to own a console back then, when PC gaming was peaking, and console gaming was for little kids, you wouldn't know.
>>727506774>zoomer thinks his opinion matterslol. lmao.
Jackie Chan
>>727510005>LOLOL OoT was 6/10 and you just fell for marketingit's a walking sim for babies
>>727506774Objectively incorrect, kill yourself for real (in real life) in a permenent and irreversible way (to death) please (and thank you)Fag
>>727510169name one PC adventure game on par with oot that came out before it
>>727511879>>727511994>nintentoddlers triggeredYou really should grow out of your emotional connection to a shitty game from your childhood.
>>727511879A real classic should be both boomer and zoomer-approved. Homer survived thousands of year. Will OoT? Will Chrono Nigger?These games will be forgotten once the nostalgia-blinded generation dies.
>>727512095Zelda will outlast your favorite game, yes.
>>727512070You should suck a turd out of my ass
>>727512197never ceases to amaze me how fragile the nintendo aspies are
>>727504975template
>>727512630>templateIt is perfect as it is, actually.
>>727512602
>>727505057There's always that mf that hates on every game
Fantasy Zone
>>727505059Sure, we can agree that it's "good", but RE4babbies treat it like the GOTYAY in a fashion not even the most rabid tendie could even attempt to emulate with OoT.
>>727504975Was this made using ZIT?
