[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1739373448525940.png (624 KB, 927x624)
624 KB
624 KB PNG
Let me guess: you "need" more?
>>
File: file.png (2 KB, 433x22)
2 KB
2 KB PNG
>>728539874
yes I do.
am I still gonna use spinning rust as well? yes.
>>
What's the average lifespan of a SATA HDD? ive been storing stuff for close to a decade on a 8TB external WD and about to run out of space, looking to maybe bump it up to a 16TB.

Been on hoarding spree to secure a ton of digital shit because i have a bad feeling about the future
>>
>>728539874
Is there any actually noticeable benefit for using an external SSD for PS4 games on PS5 or is USB such a bottleneck I might as well buy 5TB of spinning rust for much, much cheaper? Already have an M.2 in the console for PS5 games.
>>
>>728540836
Your too late, they are all gone.
>>
File: images (31).jpg (18 KB, 499x400)
18 KB
18 KB JPG
>>728540836
I had an old HDD that laid in a cardboard box unprotected for close to a decade. Took it out and plugged it in 4 months ago and it's been running like a charm.

So long as you keep them relatively covered and stationary they can last forever.
>>
>>728540836
That depends on a use case and model, but in general the manufacturer specifies expected life span in the model's data sheet.
In my experience, hot use (regular heavy read/write) — advisable to replace every 5-7 years. Warm/cold archive — last over a decade.

Also, a PSA: remember to backup. Also remember, RAID is not backup.
>>
>>728539874
What do you expect me to do when it finally gives out?
>>
>>728539874
i need four 12TB drives running in RAID 10
>>
>>728540836
>What's the average lifespan of a SATA HDD?
You know what, not that long. Every single HDD I've had failed within 4-6 years, excepting external HDDs which I just lost before it came to that. It's consistent enough that I don't think they were lemons
>>
>>728539874
As a matter of fact, yeah
>>
File: Capturee.png (7 KB, 191x381)
7 KB
7 KB PNG
yeah
>>
>>728540836
I have some HDD from 2006 and they are still running.

My main storage in my PC is HDD and it has been like that for the past 10 years.

NVME is faster but SATA HDD is a great alternative for non meme things.
>>
>>728540836
Several decades assuming you don't move and bang your shit around very much. Most data centers still use them for long-term storage where retrieval time isn't terribly important.
>>
File: 1750479942555692.png (76 KB, 938x300)
76 KB
76 KB PNG
wtf
>>
>attention whore red lines
>>
>>728544339
Based. My WD10EADS is only at 65k hours.
>>
>>728539874
Linux with XFCE is barely useable on this.
Windows 10 is fucking hell.
>>
>>728540836
My HDD has been running for 10 years now through heavy use but you should just keep to the 5 year mark and back it up on a new one. If what you're keeping is really important to you then that's the only way because this shit can randomly fail. Imagine a folder of obscure fanart just turning to dust.
>>
>>728543971
So is RAID just a way of speeding up read times by putting the same data on two different drives you can read from simultaneously? I've always wondered
>>
>>728539874
>mfw I still have a 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3 from 2012 that's still operating
It's basically just a storage drive now but I'm frankly surprised spinning rust has lasted this long.
>>
>>728550758
RAID 1 keeps a clone of the same data on another drive, yes. RAID 0 on the other hand "stripes" the data over multiple drives, meaning the data is written alternating writing a few bytes to one drive, then a few bytes to the next drive etc.
Both result in faster read speeds. RAID 0 gets faster write speeds too.
Striped RAID 0 volumes become the combined size of all included drives. Cloned RAID 1 volumes are only as big as one drive.
RAID 0 is riskier, since if one drive fails, your data is unrecoverable. If a drive in RAID 1 fails, you can replace the failed drive.
You can combine RAID 1+0 to make bigger volumes that are also safe from the occasional failed drive.
But RAID 1 is not considered a backup solution. Just a way to keep your data relatively safer from physical harm.
>>
>>728545578
What garbo are you buying..
>>
>>728545578
You probably have smokers in the house
>>
>>728545578
Stop buying Seagate
>>
>>728540836
its definitely not gonna last longer than 15 years of regular use, maybe 16 at the absolute most

if they are in storage and not spinning up though they last a very long time
>>
>>728545578
>buying green drives and seagate hdds which have LITERALLY fallen into the sea and been sold before
lel
>>
>>728552778
Probably good advice in general, but I've got a Seagate 500gb HDD that's at least 15 years old that still works.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.