>game has feathered dinosaursAaaand dropped.
Left looks like its from Jurassic ParkRight looks like its from Reddit
>seething about feathers againyou have to be above 18 to post here
>>728884101Feathers don't belong in Jurassic Park.
>>728883626sex with both
>>728883626that cool thing you like? sorry but the (((science))) says its not actually cool
explain how "giant bird with sharp teeth running fast" is less cool than "giant lizard with sharp teeth running fast" without sounding autistici'll wait
>>728884434Because birds aren't scary in the primal way that lizards are.
>>728884434feathers are for fucking faggots
>>728884541>>728884547i said WITHOUT sounding autistic
>>728884590You can't explain why what I said was autistic.Reptiles are scarier on a more primal level than birds are and that's just a fact.
I still don't understand people bitching about feathers.
>>728884726Old = good/new = bad.
>>728884726Its an ameriburger thing
>>728883626both look cool
>>728883626i'm fucking tired of feathered dino hate in here, with the right designs they can look gorgeous, like in prehistoric kingdomthat said you have to consider both characterization, motifs/patterns and species when making a feathered dinosaur: you're certainly not going to make a stegosaurus with feathers, making feathered large theropods isn't fitting and lazily taking existing birds' plumage is a shit job. not to mention that putting realistic dinosaurs in fucking jurassic world is such a fucking stupid design clash i can't believe people let that shit run, only because of accuracy autists i guess?frontier's deinonychus sucks dick both with and without feathers btw
How do we know they had feathersWe can't tell any structure outside of bones even existed like cartilage and stuff, I thought?
>>728884898wrong image, meant to post this
>>728883626here's your feathered dinosaurhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDMHHw8JqLE
>>728884726I don't understand why people bitch that other people like a particular style better.You people flip your shit now whenever movies don't bother to adhere 100% to scientific ACKuracy that'll be outdated by next month and it's obnoxious.
>>728884541>being scared of lizardsYou might actually be a woman.
>>728884814I'm American and any new information that gives us a clearer image of these fascinating extinct animals is exciting to me. Do the people that bitch about feathers bitch about the upright t rex changing to the horizontal t rex?
>>728885079>being scared of birdsYou're actually a bugman.
>>728883626>from ugly walking ballsack to cute landbirdI see an improvement
>>728884924non-bony elements in fossils have been found for ages and recognized ever since paleontology became a real thing, else we wouldn't have found all those soft invertebrates (which are mostly "impressions" in the rock though)they do tend to be really rare but a lot of dinosaur skin impressions, integument (feathers included) and internal organs have been found on the regularsee: scipionix, sciurimimus, mummified hadrosaur
I think you can have accurate dinosaurs but Jurassic Park should be left alone for the sake of style preservation.It was never meant to be accurate in the first place. Don't know why so many retards want to change that.
>>728885067>scientific ACKuracy that'll be outdated by next monthYet I've been hearing all this whining about feathers for about 20 years now. When are the scientists going to change their mind on that?
>>728884680i asked how it's less cool, not how it's less scarybirds are pretty cool guys tooin fact i'd take a falcon or something over a lizard any day and if you disagree that's fine but obviously you aren't going to say "i prefer geckos to owls because of my primal fear of geckos"
>>728883626I do not understand why do we believe that dinosaurs existed but dragons didn't? Like why every culture in the world have their own depictions of dragons if it didn't exist? At some point in history there was more information about dragons than actual dinosaurs. More people knew about dragons than about dinosaurs.
>>728884726It's because it is different than how it was when they were kids.
>Erm...feathers don't fit (((Spielberg's))) vision
reptiles are just cooler than birdsfor some reason someone is trying to make dinosaurs gay and lame, and feathers are part of the plan. The gayest thing I've seen was dinosaur mating dances with dinos moving their tiny colored arms like retards, someone must have the webm
>>728885559church destroyed the dragon fossils so now we have no examples and people assume they are fake
>>728885470They have actually, but featherfags don't like to accept that for some reason
>>728885281because for some reason jurassic world is really really hated by the whole scientifically-oriented dinosaur communityoh who am i kidding, it's autism as usual; these people just can't stand that the most popular dinosaur media ever, basically synonym with dinosaurs as a whole, doesn't give two fucks about scientific accuracy and animal-like behaviors and they really can't wrap their minds over the fact someone would rather see a t-rex maul people and shit to death than it doing whatever the fuck those autists want it to do. it's just yet another facet of Great Autismo. and the funny thing, most of the attempts those guys do at making accurate media get completely ignored because, surprise, their view of dinosaurs being boring animals is boring.I fucking hate autistic people so goddamn much
>>728883626>Dinosaurs were found to be living in the northern hemisphere, where it was cold>keratin scales are supposed to allow that somehowyou scalies are retarded.
>>728885509I can turn that right around on you and say you aren't gonna say "I prefer robins to komodo dragons because of my primal fear of robins"Which is an intentionally snide distortion of what I was saying just to prop up your point. Weak argument.
>>728885585They don't actually. Didn't fit Crichton's either.
>>728885723something being scarier doesn't automatically make it cooler you autistic nigger
>>728885667feathering aside, they could've have fat deposits to mitigate the cold, and despite not being actually confirmed, it's a leading reasoning behind the theory that dinosaurs ere hot-blooded (or at least had alternate homeo-heterothermy)on the other hand, there seems to be lending that even in the late cretaceous the earth kept being hot enought to have minimal, if at all boreal/polar biomes
>>728885657Exactly. I just want my movie franchise to be thrilling and fun in the way that popularized it in the first place but now you have too many paleofags trying to "fix" it now that Michael Crichton's dead as some sort of revenge.
>>728885559>he doesn't know
if fish can live in cold water why do dinosaurs need feathers for cold airexplain that one creationists
>>728885958Right back at you again.Slapping feathers on something doesn't automatically make it cooler. Shitting your diaper about it like you fags always do wont make people think they're cool, either.
>>728885667Both scales and feathers are correct because dinosaurs ruled earth for over 100 MILLION years and they lived everywhere in many different biomes so evolution went in different directions. There is evidence for both.
>>728884680i think that's only because not many big birds exist that are violent and aggressive.
>>728885667Right Because the Earth doesn't change at all during the millions of years the dinosaur eras span. >Ah yes, we found T. rex skulls in Alaska, this means they must've lived in FUCKING IGLOOS!
>>728885559dragons are dinosaurs and dinosaurs are dragons
>>728886324you are genuinely autistic
>>728886134it's not like jurassic park isn't in a shit state right now, with hybrid dinosaurs being all over the place because making good stories with the existing cast and species isn't enoughthough to be fair i think it's seriously hard to make a decent story centered on dinosaurs without stepping on already trodden narrative territory, if you get what i mean. there's a reason most of the time they are merely a setting or cannon fodder enemies in movies and vidya
>>728886501You have no argument.
>>728883626while would they have feathers and normal eyes? they were fucking lizards lmao
Scales are badass and imaging a 50 ton version of one of these guys will always win. Bird fags just can't compete
>>728886404Geese. Swans.
>>728886453>northern hemisphere is not cold, cuz antartica and alaska didn't exist!brainlet tier.
>>728883626There was a game called dino island in my primary school's PC lab. I remember it fondly.
>>728883626I bet you're still mad about Pluto too
>>728886515Yeah that's true too. One thing featherfags like to accuse JP fans of is accepting all those shit World designs over feathers just because they aren't accurate when that's far from the truth.I haven't met anyone that actually likes any of the designs from World, like Giga for example. It's just horrendously ugly.JP's style made their dinosaurs aesthetically pleasing in ways that made sense.
could it be that they confuse types of dinosaurs?some were reptiles and some were birds. i doubt there would have been some sort of hybrid reptile/bird thing. reptiles that have wings now don't have feathers, so is it not possible that dinosaurs with feathers were just birds, and some dinosaurs were reptiles. other dinosaurs in the sea were just massive whales and other creatures. also giant insects. is dinosaur just a catch all for massive extinct animals in the past?
>>728883626This whole thing about hating feathered dinosaurs seems to me like the reaction of retards who watched Jurassic Park as children and became attached to the artistic design of those specific dinosaurs, rather than the reaction of people who are genuinely interested in and study dinosaurs.
>>728886832too small. i was thinking cassowaries or larger.
When I was a kid, my favorite dinosaur was the pachycephalosaurus. I used tk scream "I'M A PACHYCEPHALOSAURUS!" and run full force at our heavy wooden front door and crack my head on it and pretend to fall over and die to make people laugh
Feathers are to dinosaurs what pronouns are to woketards
>>728887065Yeah, it's called "baby duck syndrome"
>>728887065Feathered dinosaurs just look gay. It's not that deep.
I legitimately don't understand what's not to like on an aesthetic level about some dinosaurs having feathers. Non-feathered dinosaurs have always felt like lizards with a size slider set to fuckhuge values, which is all fine and dandy, but with some feathers sprinkled in you get something distinct and exotic compared to what we have today, not fitting the image of a typical scale-only reptile despite their general look, while also still being a far call from modern birds.
>>728887080Most large birds tend to be either neutral or somewhat friendly to humans.
>>728883626Why do modern devs hate giving players choices? Surely it's not hard to have both models in the game and load one based on player preference?
>>728884434You sound like a faggot>I'm afraid of a pidgeonJust fuck off
>>728887349Thats exactly what they did though in this case, but having the other option is enough to make people bitch.
Here's the thing, birdfags.People look at these, the defining features that are inherently reptilian and react accordingly. They don't care about the "birdlike hips" because that's not something that stands out.
>>728887364As opposed to...>I'm afraid of a gecko
sex with the right
>>728887476The other one got added because featherfags bitched about the lizard deinonychus design for years though.
>>728887476God fucking dammit i forgot that OP was a faggot and retarded i can only blame myself fuck this thread its useless
>>728887550bro, your cassowary?
birds are reptiles
>>728885585>I have to be contrarian because DA JOOZ
>>728887550no one tell him about platypi
>>728887476waste of dev time forced by feather fags
>>728887550>inherently reptilian>when almost no actual reptiles have feet or claws like that but birds do
>>728886917yes, aestethics and characterization trump over accuracy all the time.paleo autists tend to adorn their dinosaur designs with garish colors and unfitting patterns, and portray their dinosaurs in boring poses and actions that, while arguably realistic, they don't really appeal anyone beside other like minded peoplereal artists not only do whatever they feel it's better fitting for the creature, they may as well ignore these preconceptions as they aim to just make a good piece of art/creature design. it's also unsurprising that they are the ones that make homages to JP and WWD, unlike paleo autists that either turn a blind eye or try to pathethically rectify these in their own headcanoni appreciate prehistoric kingdom despite being a shit game exactly because it leans on the latter rather than the former regarding their dinosaur designs
>>728887738notice the gay beak? looks nothing like a raptor
>>728887626This. Featherfags get options and exactly what they want if they bitch about it long enough, but if I bitch about how I want a JP-style Utahraptor without feathers, something that's been in the franchise since the beginning? I'm told to just shut up and be happy.
>>728887080Ostriches.
>>728887857snap those like a twig
>>728887857Don't be dishonest, you know exactly what I mean.
This is why crocodiles and gators won, these guys don't have gay feathers.
>>728887576put a spoiler on that i nearly soiled myself
>>728888010
>>728888073God, you guys are so effeminate
>>728888104prance around with you gay feathers lil fagtron.
>>728887956Those cowards that hide their head in the sand? T-Rex would laugh at it and then eat it in one gulp.
It's funny that the new Turok the dinosaurs are aliens so they don't have to be faggy feather fag dinos
>>728888091
>>728883626>upset because he doesn't get a bald lizard
I'm just waiting for that certain kind of fag to show up claiming that Jurassic Park was supposed to be accurate. There's always one.
>>728886515i only watched the original jurassic park movies, i saw a toy of this at walmart and am wondering what the fuck is even going on in those movies these days.
Featherfags must die
>people used to think dinosaurs were giant murder lizards>turns out they were giant murder birdsOk, why are people upset?
>>728888091saw one of these guys free-roaming in a zoo once, really impressive, striking creaturesand absolutely intimidating too, that one was very pushy and a meter tall
>>728888246Now that's a real claw.
>>728888246And this is a monitor lizard.
>>728883626We should just make up a new monster with all the qualities we liked about dinosaurs but under a new name. And since it's made up, no one can complain that it's ackshually supposed to be lame and gay, because it's make believe and can be whatever the fuck we want it to be. Then everyone can move on from giving a single shit about dinosaurs besides hardcore paleo nerds and contrarian autists and the rest of us can continue to have nice things
>>728888509Kino.
>>728888409That's closer to what Michael Crichton wanted Jurassic Park to be like.
>>728883626Furfags ruin fucking EVERYTHING
>>728888648Crichton wanted a retarded T. rex design that was ripped off from Star Wars?
>>728888570or... we could just use superior lifeforms as opposed to gay autistic lizards from now on
>>728888670
>>728888789>bears have more dinosaur-like claws than birdsBased.
>>728888739Jurassic Park doesn't have dinosaurs. It has genetic chimeras that are supposed to align with what the general public thinks dinosaurs looked like. They have bits of genetic code from everything, from frogs to fish to gastropods to even human beings.
>>728888874Agreed.D. rex is still retarded, thoughever.
>>728886791>wanting aesthetics over realitythat's woman brain logic.
>>728888745Either way I think "muh realism muh accuracy" when applied to such things is utter cancer and will always attempt to kill the fun when it gets big enough. These sorts of limitations are best sidestepped in some way. Like >>728888207Cool behemoth btw
The saurian spirit lives on
>>728889119That's what Jurassic Park was though.You seem to be obsessed with what's considered feminine despite not being a woman. That's tranny behavior.
>>728888995There's an irony in it being retarded because it's meant to "one up" the T. Rex, in-universe and in the real world. I'd say that the spinosaurus from 3 is more retarded simply because there was no in-universe explanation for it being better than the T. Rex.
>>728889228>wipes his gory blade
>>728885159>tfw you were always just a ballsack
>>728889119There is evidence for scaled dinosaurs though so shut up bird fag.
>>728883626Realism is good. Better graphics and models are good.Stay mad over nothing
>>728889294Bullshit, Spinosaurus was implied to be a secret experiment. You already said JP didn't have real dinosaurs so it's completely in line with your logic that they should be able to cook something up that's super aggressive and could overpower a T. rex.
>>728889279>That's what Jurassic Park was though.Not really. People completely memory hole how much it changed what people knew about dinosaurs because it used more up to date information at the time to inform the traits.
>>728889458I haven't watched 3 in a bit, but if I recall correctly, T. Rex just jobs to it the entire movie.
>>728889119Impossible. That would mean women have souls and imaginations.
>>728889381There's evidence for scales, feathers, both and neither.
>>728889483There's no memory hole, it just popularized a shift in paleontology that was already happening.That doesn't mean the dinosaurs were accurate, they just used the current science as a basis to make their special effects more believable.
>>728889602Yup
>>728889550>T. Rex just jobs to it the entire movie.You definitely haven't watched it in a bit.
>>728889119real women would just draw whatever gets their clitty wet regardless of aesthetics or realism
>>728889686The parts I remember most accurately are the kid eating baked beans in a bunker, the test tube raptor jumpscare, and ALAN.
>>728889571You just know that if those shrimp things were real there would be a video of one getting deep fried in a huge fucking cauldron.
>>728885559
>>728883626idk I think these little one are pretty neat.
The only dinosaur that should have feathers is Archaeopteryx.End of story.
>>728886453always wondered why there's such a clear cut between land and ocean at the start, why not a constellation of islands.
>>728884260/thread
>>728889228thank you for cutting out the gruesome violence
>>728889814I love the way you think, anon.
>>728890142continental plates + islands leaving minimal geological record over these timescales
didn't the first jurassic park mention feathered dinosaurs? that's how i first learned about them
>>728890045Ok, but what about quills?
>>728890356Quills are better than feathers but that looks aesthetically dumb.
>>728884541>>728884680I'm pretty sure hominids have been killed more by giant birds than by giant reptiles
>>728883626>game has feathered dinosaursAaaand picked up
>>728889974Anchiornis huxleyi my beloved
>>728890462crocodiles snacking on africans beat all the birds combined
>>728890537Hmm you're right, I forgot about crocodiles
>>728884898Featherfaggery ultimately exists as a humiliation ritual for popular JP dinos. Giant chicken Rex w/copypasted peacock patterns and feathered Spinosaurs are what it all leads up to, even if I quite like every other feathered dino
Why do people act as if feathers are such a big deal when it basically only affects raptors? Dinosaurs who were already very feminine and breedable
Can anyone explain why anti-woke tards are seething over feathers?
>>728890939autists respond poorly to changet. gigachud featherchad
>>728890457One controversial theory is that many if not all ceratopsians had quill like structures based on the anatomy found from one Psittacosaurus specimen, one of the earliest ceratopsians.
>>728890939>the historical accuracy camp is complaining about feathersDoubt it
Give me the rundown to someone completely ignorant on the topic. Is the general understanding that dinosaurs COULD have had feathers in theory, i.e. there's nothing scientific that says they didn't, or that they actually did provably have feathers?
>>728883626I will now buy your game
>>728883626micro raptors and their descendants probably did have some feather or something like. The problem is when they drop them on all theropods.T-Rex almost assuredly did not have feathers. We have fossilized skin of them.
>>728891104Some did, some didn't, some had things that were like feathers but clearly not, and we just don't know and never will.
birdbros, rise up
>>728884541>>728884680You keep saying "primal" like its supposed to mean something. How about you actually try explaining your stance. And fyi early hominids were hunted by giant harpy eagles, not giant lizards.
Crocs are the boomers of the animal kingdom
>>728883958Left looks like a fantasy creature Right looks like something that could actually exist
>>728891239Yet we're more scared of crocs and gators than we are eagles, so what's your point?
>>728891287They're both fantasy creatures. One is shrinkwrappped, the other is featherwrapped.
>>728891287upvoted
>>728891104No there's undeniable proof that some dinosaurs had feathers. Some had scales. It's a huge timescale we're dealing with and fossils all over the world from species that never interacted with each other.
>>728891252Another dino thread? I'll post my favorite one the CHAD deinosuchus>only confirmed dinosaur to actually LOOK like a dino
>>728891104There's fossil records of some raptor like species having them, but there's a bit of speculation when it comes to which ones had them, and we don't know if the larger ones loss them as they age
>>728884814Everything is. Give me your fucking oil.>>728891367>shrinkwrappedI don't like the trend of just how fat they're making everything out to be. It's like they just took an inflate brush to some existing models like some sort of sick fetishists. Give me my fucking cool ass dragons back.>and fyi early hominids were hunted by giant harpy eagles, not giant lizardsprobably both. there used to be crocodillians that could sprint like a motherfucker and were nearly twice as long as current crocs
>>728891638
>>728891629NOT a dinosaur.
>>728891638>ChinasaurWhy is it people are so willing to trust notorious liars about anything?
>>728890356>ello im a retardosaurus
>>728890142islands get eroded by water, there was that island that was born some years ago and the world governments and hippies were everyone fuck off nobody is allowed from coming in here and then yeras later that island is almost gone because erosion. only very big island survive.
>>728891705if humans had survived the asteroid, do you think they would still be feathered?
>>728891104Several species of theropods probably had feathers. Which really isn't a surprise, given that all currently living theropod dinosaurs have them.
>>728890939Gee I dunno why such a person would be anti change and anti science
Dragons had feathers.
>>728891913>probably*provably
>>728890142try accurately guessing the coastlines of a 100MY old continent, retard
>>728890939So feathers are a woke matter supported by woketards?
>>728891930>anti scienceif only there were a middle ground.like not putting feathers on dinosaurs that didn't have them. i've seen dipshit renderings of fuckin sauropods with feathers.
>>728891640I don't think we make them fat enough.
The deinosuchus was the largest crocodillian of its time, had sharp fangs, and was very big on its ambushing capabilities. Everything that scientists dislike about old dinosaurs is basically this thing, it's a beaut and I would've loved to ride one in its heydey.>>728891798True, but it's impossible to not see the resemblance to old movie dinos. I love this thing.
>>728891315>we're scared of the things that look exactly the same as opposed to the miniatures Even people in the movies talk about how non-scary the chicken-sized dinosaurs are
>>728883626Which Disney movie is right from?
>>728886453centrifugal force of earth spinning just flinging the continents apart.
>>728891813but enough about anglos!
>>728891239Visualize a two tons chicken.It's not scary, it's goofy.
I refuse to believe anyone this upset about dinosaurs that don't look like movie monsters isn't a child or mentally disabled. Did people throw tantrums when it was discovered that Tyrannosaurus rex didn't walk upright?
>>728892232Yet most gators and crocs are smaller than us.
>>728892167>True, but it's impossible to not see the resemblance to old movie dinos. I love this thing.Yeah, they're cool. Agreed. I always like Plesiosaurus which is also not a dinosaur. Because I want the loch ness monster to be real.
>people in 15k A.C.>due to the bone structure this majestic beast must have had feathers
>>728892167Like half of the Crocodilomorpha looked like 19th century/early 20th century dino reconstructions.
>>728892292Depends on the type of chicken.
>>728892134I've noticed that the aggressive feather fags seem to believe that the feather discovery proves that we were wrong about dinosaurs and they ALL had feathers. They smugly want to destroy every old render of a dinosaur and replace it with a bird like thing.These people are anti-science and ironically they accuse others of that.
>>728892292Try saying that after one has eaten half of your family. Your whole comment chain reads like a breakfast meme.
>>728892340Imagine getting so BTFO that you need to pretend to be stupid
>>728892348But they don't have quill knobs... what the fuck are you talking about?
>>728892348Except the bones would be clearly mammalian and lack feather indentation.
>>728892489Why would you have to imagine getting BTFO, you just did?
>>728892491Anon is just being retarded. Please understand.
>>728885470Like lucy it hasn't been considered good science for more than a decade.The actual scientific method already moved on.Some, very few had some type of sparse feather either in some limited aera or had thin feather as youth like t. rex, but did not kept them as adults.
>>728892491featherfags are using the same argument to prove their shitty theory imagine>elephants with feathers>hippos with feathers
>>728892601Is this some pro-feather falseflag? I refuse to believe scalies are actually this retarded.
>>728892601WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT
>>728892601least schizophrenic dino manchild
>>728892601>hippos with feathers
>>728892601
>>728892660Featherfags really are that desperate.
>>728891629It's Kaprosuchus for me
>>728886842congratulations on being the biggest retard on the entire website
>>728892601Why do you hate feather so such, anon? theropoda includes birds, they are dinosaurs.
>>728892348We have evidence that the dinosaurs who looked like that didn't have feathers
>>728892867because a large sized chicken would look very stupid
>>728892939Alright pick a fight with a cassowary and see how dumb it is
I'm more oboard with dinosaurs looking like crocodiles rather than birds. The most perfectly preserved fossil of dinosaur looks like a weird looking crocodile rather than a chicken.
>>728892939
>>728893005>aussies lost to this
>>728893019it will run away
>>728892939>argument from personal incredulityYeah, that doesn't fly, I'm afaraid
>>728892879We have evidence that at least one ancestral branch had quills though, and rule of cool dictates that the more spikes and sharp edges something has, the cooler it is.
>>728892817This thing's bite looks mean, good choice anon
>>728893019>teleports behind it because it's stupid and has a tiny brain for birds who are dumb>snaps its twiglike bones with a karate chopokay what now
>>728893039That's a badass turtle
>>728891967
>>728891287s o y
>>728893039I'm not completely sure but I think none of the herbivores had feathers
>>728893090black bears run away from humans, people still find them scary.
>>728893005Look at the tiny walnut size brain on this thing. Real dinosaurs were way smarter.
>>728893226ENTER
>>728893039>he believes in fossilsLmfao
>>728893380Why does it look like pubic hair?
>>728893380That's more closely related to birds than t-rex
>>728893126Give it a shot dude. Record it.
>>728893473Herbivory causes you to become ugly. See: vegetarians and vegans.
>>728887320The ones that weren't friendly tend to die quickly once humans start industrialising. Used to be huge eagles in New Zealand a thousand or two years ago. There tons of tales about it then they found skeletons.
>>728885559What if the dragons were dinosaurs that simply survived the extinction event? Only problem is they go extinct eventually anyway.
>>728893039
Reminder that this is the only evidence we have of Velociraptor having feathers.Barely visible bumps on a single, eroded bone.From this, Redditors decided EVERY raptor had feathers despite there being no actual evidence and paleontologists ran with it because that meant more funding.>b-but what about China's feathered fossils???Funny how the West has had skin in the game for much longer with next to nothing to show for it as far as feather evidence goes on things like raptors, but once China gets involved suddenly it's breakthrough after breakthrough. Pure coincidence, I'm sure. Nothing to do with their reputation of pretending to be better than everyone else. Oh, and pay no attention to things like Archaeoraptor, once considered a "missing link" between dinosaurs and birds, and other proven fossil forgeries to scam rich customers out of money. You shouldn't raise an eyebrow at that, that doesn't count.
>>728893656>ALL THE EVIDENCE I DON'T LIKE DOESN'T COUNT!!!Meds.
>>728885142>He hasn't seen Australian birds.
>>728884924>How do we know they had feathersthe only dinosaurs left alive today have feathers
>>728891813the fossil youre looking at is from Italy. not to mention Archaeopteryx from Germany discovered in the 1800s.
>>728893039That's not a theropod. it's a nodosaur. and they were going extinct right around when feathered theropods were coming around iirc.btw the oldest known bird with a beak (bill, anyway) was a duck like thing. it lived the same time as dinos in the late cretaceous. i forget it's name.There are more autistic anons here who can tell you better specifics.
>>728893039As a deinosuchus fan, I'd agree, but the feather anons do raise up a good point of dinos having poultry DNA in them, along with bird habits.
>>728893731>NOOOO CHINA AND OTHER COUNTRIES WITH SCAM CULTURES WOULDN'T JUST LIE THEY TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT EVERYTHINGMeds.
>>728884434Because on average a bird is rather harmless to a human, they are extremely common and are seen almost daily depending what you do. Lizards on the other hand are much rarer to see, this invokes more mystery about them, people immediately think about large dangerous lizards, and because they look cool. If someone brings a pet lizard and a pet bird to school, the boys want to see the lizard and the girls want to see the bird. There is your answer ma'am
>>728893226It is actually hard to tell if an animal is a herbivore or not based on the bones. Alot of turtles are carnivores yet they would look like something that never hurt a fly. Monkeys are mostly herbivorous, yet they have sharp teeth while we human eats and hunts more often, yet we have herbivore looking teeth. You might never know, what if Ankylosaurus were omnivores and eat fish like turtles nowadays? Or even better, actually carnivorous?
>>728893797>IT'S DA COMMIES!!!Kiss the Jewish wall, freedombro.
>>728883626This is a bad comparison since both of those look lame. That skull structure is like the dinosaur equivalent of a onions face.Realism is the bane of fun games. I want dinosaurs to be scaly and menacing looking, like in the earlier jurassic parks. I don't give a shit about speculative accuracy to extinct animals.
>>728893797So your claim is that the bone is fake?
>>728893880Interesting
>>728893797>they got caught scamming once yet somehow never ever got caught again.
>>728893891Funny you mention commies, because this attempt to overwrite established cultural norms with "unquestionable truth" is actually very communist in nature, once exhibited by, you guessed it, China.
>>728894030>once
>>728883626Adding an age verification method to 4chan would drastically improve the quality of posts here.
>>728893873Taking something seemingly harmless and making it scary or extremely powerful is a well-weathered cliche though.
>>728894182>Blind application to every other dinos just because of some Chingchangchong found prehistoric birds>Hurr...You must be an underage if you don't believe that
>>728885559Because drakon means a specific shape of viper's head initially. It was wildly mis-described from antiquity to the middle age.That large sea viper being extinct by that point did not help.
>>728893656You would think they would fabricate something cooler
>>728893880Man has flat teeth because of the discovery of cooking made food easy to chew and speech also made smaller less cumbersome teeth a evolutionary advantage.
>some polish people, known liars, find fragmentary bones>BROSKI THIS MIGHT BE A DINOSAUR, A CROCODILIAN, OR SOMETHING ELSE ENTIRELY!
>>728894301and the chinese benefit from lying about dinosaurs... why?
>>728894480To prove to the gullible morbidly obese western neckbeards that care about dinosaurs beyond "oh cool, new Jurassic Park movie on netflix" that china numba wan... for... REASONS OKAY!?!?!?
>>728894480Why wouldn't China benefit from being the new paleontology hotbed for redditors into pop science?Especially when America held that title for so long. We're the home of the T. rex.
>>728893080You weren't there man. You don't know what it was like. Those.. things are monsters.
>>728893380>Wrinkled ballsack no true>Hairy ballsack trueFuck this gay earth.
Uh all the thunder lizards or longneckers as I like to call them get the hell out of the Great Valley or I will close the watering hole again
>>728894030Once a cheater, always a cheater.
>>728894879I wonder why didn't those Australian mercenaries just dynamite those emus to oblivion or just poison them. Talk about incompetence.
>>728894480National pride is one hell of a drug.
>>728894838That's still America's title. China doesn't have a robust film industry yet and they only make wuxia-themed video games and gacha. If China releases a Dark Souls ripoff where you fight as and/or against dinosaurs instead of people, then you can be worried.
>>728894838Unfortunately for you, the push for infrastructure has led to the discovery of more fossils in china, maybe americans ought to do the same again, or fund paleontology (as if, lmao).
>>728895303It is not about the movies or entertainment industry related to dinosaur. It is the patriotism to see your country finally discovered some otherworldly things and show it to the world.
>>728895408Right, and they all have feathers because China has magic dirt that noone else has, apparently.
>>728895463Holy shit, Edward Drinker Cope is still alive? Anon, people who have lost their virginity don't care about dinosaurs outside of what they're shown in movies and games, and those movies and games just aren't being made by the Chinese.
>>728885559We actually have physical evidence of dinosaurs, unlike dragons. Many cultures also have ogre and gnome analogs in their folklore. Doesn't mean that those are real either.
>>728895568Actually, ogres and gnomes do have physical evidence backing up their existence.
>>728895527Well, the main thing going for them is they didn't bother looking for so long that there's plenty of stuff lying around. Gotta remember, China itself is very large, almost comparable to the size of the US n land mass. The feathers thing also apparently is a result of the way dinosaurs died in the area, where many were preserved in a way that is similar to the mummies in Pompeii.
>>728895527the same way you retards were like "umm, dinosaurs were all scalies", if anything they most likely had scales AND feathers.
>>728895558>Anon, people who have lost their virginity don't care about dinosaurs outside of what they're shown in movies and gamesPeople do as a hobby. A large portion of human population still care and speculate about cryptids and the possibilities of their existence. Dinosaur speculation is a branch of that. The intrique of dinosaur mostly comes from the mystery surrounding them, not what kind of cgi footage you can watch.
>>728895683Majority didn't even have scales. They had smooth, wrinkly skin.
>>728895683The irony of this post.
>>728895408>maybe americans ought to do the same againNew T-Rex was found a month ago.
>>728895608doko
>>728895663If they were "preserved" we'd have actual 3D outlines of them, not just skeletons with etched-in feathers in the rock around it.
>>728895568>Many cultures also have ogre and gnome analogs in their folklore.Ogre come from fossils of prehistoric human or some speculate to be elephant bones. Gnome is just real life people with dwarfism but. Both of them exist.
>>728895873World is filled with skeletons of big and little people. Those are ogres and gnomes. You drive a weird little freaky man out of your village, he wanders off to another village, boom, gnome. Some big dullard wanders off into the forest and subsists off of stealing food from picnickers, boom, ogre.
>>728895753>dinosaurs had ballsack skinoh i hate this
>>728895753>They had smooth, wrinkly skinYeah
>>728896051It makes them scarier. Adding sexual elements to monsters always does.
>>728895753
>>728895994The Euros even made up the whole legend of Spriggan because of autistic people. Spriggan stole their real child and replaced them with Changelings. Stuff like that.
>>728895753>Majority didn't even have scales. They had smooth, wrinkly skin.
>>728892939Not really. Just look up Terror Birds.
>The T-Rex was a giant parakeet that never roared and exclusively ate it's own shit!
>>728883626I think they both look neat, sorry fag
>>728896113monsterfuckers disagree.
>>728896360T Rex is overrated. The croc is where it is at.
>>728888407It's because they know they'll get BTFO by Jurassic Park chads that know their shit, despite the fact that anyone with 2 eyes and a working brain can tell you that the guy that made a giant shark destroy a boat to eat people on it probably didn't give a shit that his fake Hollywood dinosaur movie wasn't 100% accurate.JP was never about accuracy.
>>728896360sparrow, but yes
>>728896587Or rather, that's why they haven't shown up yet.
>>728896723This is so heckin cool! I love The Science™!
>>728891287Agreed, the left does look better
On another note, apparently now the scientists are claiming the Neanderthals were superhuman and the digusting plebs known as homo sapiens raped them and ruined their genepool.
>>728896924they've been saying white people have like 5% Neanderthal DNA for decades
>>728883626This place is insane enough to pretend like the worst dinosaur in the first two games wasn't an abomination solely for their contrarian fetish.
>>728884260Based retard
>>728884434lizards are inherently cool, and birds are noisy, spastic little dorks. sorry if the truth hurts.
>>728896924Our women loved big Neanderthal cock.
>>728883626Evolution is just a theory.
>>728896924>the digusting plebs known as homo sapiens raped them and ruined their genepool.They've always said that.
>Jurassic World has gotten 3 park building games>somehow has less park building content, looks uglier and plays worse than Operation Genesis a game from 2003
>>728896993The concept isn't bad at all. The people that hate Deinonychus because they gave it basilisk features are retards that don't understand the JP style.
>Jane wasn't even a real T-RexI've been lied to my entire life
>>728896991Nah, that's just a genetic research. What i'm saying is that for a really long ass time, Neanderthals were refer to as inferior, retarded race of human that went extinct. But now the scientists are trying to railroad that to an opposite direction.
>>728888509>>728888246Notice how they're flat and five fingered, unlike pretty much any dinosaur (including birds).
>>728897435Show me a three fingered bird.
Reminder: Although feathers are basal to dinosaurs (see Kulindadromeus), some species evolved to lose it completely like the Ankylosaurs. This mummified Borealopelta is proof of that. Then there's Carnotaurus with its skin impressions showing scutes, a mummified Edmontosaurus showing pebbly skin, and T. rex scaly skin impressions. People like to draw T. rex with feathers because its distant ancestors that are 60 million years apart had feathers, but modern tyrannosaur fossils mostly show scaly skin impressions.
>>728897410>for a really long ass time, Neanderthals were refer to as inferior, retarded race of human that went extinctyou mean by scientists, or by random people who misunderstood and misconstrued the ideas of scientists because of an unconscious belief in innate human superiority?
>>728897410nah they're just saying it's possible the two groups could mate and did. Neanderthal was still dumber and either went extinct because we ran them out of all the good areas or they died on their own.
>>728897658Based Boreapolis, evolved away from those gay nigga feathers.
>>728893757Sinosauropteryx is from China, it's literally in the name.
>>728897435Alot of dinosaurs are five fingered, with one of the finger become a spike.
>>728898163>pass me the controller bro
>>728896723>trex
>>728883626This whole feather nonces is going out of control, yes SOME of them had it, but people now think they all were covered in them when we know for a fact that isn't true at all.
>>728898436scale sisters, our response?!!
>>728897729>or by random people who misunderstood and misconstrued the ideas of scientists because of an unconscious belief in innate human superiority?It is pretty fucking obvious that if the Neanderthals were that good, they would have achieved something greater instead of dying completely.
>>728898550I think it is just a meme that went out of control. Alot with the criticism on the shrink wraped recreation. Dinosaurs and almost every prehistoric animals are pretty much cryptids. We see the sightings, the evidences but not the real thing.
>>728883626>dinosaur means "terrible lizard">featherfags are surprised when people prefer that they look reptilian
>>728898436
>>728898767Not to mention the crocodiles were one of the dinos at one point. It is fucking stupid when revisionists just blindly apply the feather theory to everything.
>>728898912Crocs aren't dinos they're reptiles. Dinosaurs were warm-blooded, there is absolutely no way they would be able to function if they were cold-blooded.
>>728899064Why would they be warm blooded in a supposedly hot environment that Pangea was?
>>728898550>but people now think they all were covered in themWhere are people seeing this? Because the only place I see that is in the form of complaining like here.
who fuckin cares if your make believe shit has feathers or not
>>728899210The feather fags are demanding every dino in this park building game get an alternate feather skin because it's more "realistic".
>>728883626>Scalies getting dicked down againlmaooooooooooooooo
>featherfags announcing their gay rape fetish
>>728893748You mean sharks?
>>728899525Proof?
>>728899064"Dinosaur" is the umbrella term for dominant animals during that era. People even call early Avian with teeth instead of break as dinosaurs, too.
>>728898912Dinosaurs and crocs probably shared a common ancestor, but the latter aren't dinosaurs.
Do you guys think dinosaurs raped?
>>728899064When the term dinosaur got coined for the first time, Richard Owen called them lizards and crocodiles.
>>728900212Absolutely, but you just know featherfag redditors would throw a melty if that was ever hinted at.>Dinosaurs are just like birds!>NO NOT LIKE THAT
>>728899729https://steamcommunity.com/app/2958130/discussions/0/594035856760740784/
>>728900045By that logic then feathered dinosaurs are not dinosaurs.
>>728886134jaws caused an increase in shark hunting and spielberg regretted the effect the film had on the perception of sharks
>>728900330Kinda disturbing to think that chickens can only breed by rape.
>>728900330lol, it would be the opposite because it legitimizes them more as not just cute little birdies. But then, anyone who knows about birds knows they can be monsters. The shrike comes to mind as one as well as how woodpeckers were caught at one instance pecking into and eating the brains of other birds.
>>728884323Science says most did NOT have feathers. There were like, only ten or so species and the feathers covered very little skin. Almost every dinosaur was like Jurassic Park
>>728884726It's literally muh feelings over any proposed evidence.
>>728900578Evidence shows just raptors and other little shit dinos had feathers. The big boys everyone likes have no sign of feathers.
>>728900382For only a few years, based off preconceived notions that the film only played off of since it was based on real shark attacks. It sparked more interest for shark conservation and study in the long run than it did hunting.
>>728900362They are and every fucking bird you see from now until the day you croak is a dinosaur. But people just find absurdity in the idea of every theropod being depicted as some overgrown chocobo.
>>728900565I kinda doubt it, rape is worse than death to these sorts of people but I think you're right that it would embolden them more as monsters than the wholesome chungus trans rights activists that modern paleoart likes to depict them as.
>>728884101People seethe about feathers because the most recent evidence is that most dinosaurs either had no feathers, or feathers were sparse and limited to only certain parts of the body.
>>728888484Because feathered dinos is a lie. It was proven time and again almost every dinosaur was a scalie
ah, now this is a fine scalefag meltdown
>>728900802That's downplaying it.
>>728884182>Feathered reptilians don't belong in a series about genetic abominations
>>728901112What's your point
>>728901159They don't. Feathers were never meant to be a part of Jurassic Park's style.
>>728900578>proposed evidenceFeatherfags are the ones ignoring evidence. We have multiple scaly skin impressions of tyrannosaurs; that's the REAL evidence. But because some little ancestor 100 million years ago had some tufts, featherfags decided that every single dinosaur must have feathers even when they don't make sense. A giant as big as a T.rex would overheat and die if you cover it with insulation.
>>728893873Small lizards are quite common where I live, and I think they’re cute.
featherchads stay winning>m-muh scalescope
>>728891104A few raptor cousins were confirmed feathered. Almost every other dinosaur was confirmed not feathered, specially the T. Rex. But furries are still trying to push the feathers to every dinosaur with the argument>maybe they lost when they grew up therefore they did have feathers despite every fossil being confirmed having scales
I like scales and feathers and find it more or less inevitable that feathers would epigenetically emerge or go dormant in the mostly-theropod species that might plausibly have had them based on environmental factors, IE when it's cold they'll grow in, when it's hot they'll drop out. There was already evidence for partial/situational endothermy in dinosaurs by my recollection, so why not seasonal feathering?
I like both, and I'm cool with whatever ends up being true for each species/genus/etc grouping and find it fascinating, but as far as entertainment goes reptile kaiju are awesome so I want more big murder lizard movies and games regardless of the science.>>728897658It reminds me of a giant horny toad. I hope those manage to not go extinct, shit wasn't looking good for them last I checked.
>>728901263Even today there are still feathered birds with bald areas.
I used to really dislike birds until one day something just clicked and suddenly they were really cool.
>>728891967Monhun gets it right. We got scaled dragons, feathered dragons, web-winged dragons, and fuzzy dragons.
>>728891287*belches in your face*
>>728896924they weren't so superhuman if homo sapiens so handily destroyed them now were they?you're not good enough you go extinct
>>728900570Jurassic Park dinosaurs looked like they had no face muscles
reminder
>>728901968I don't get it
>>728896723Didn't have feathers.
>>728902065t. has never seen a plucked chicken
>>728902095First find a feather fossil on a T-Rex.
>>728901705None of which descended from the T-Rex.
>>728883626>THE LIBTARDS ARE FEMINIZING MY HECKIN DINOS!!!!!!!!
>>728902095t. Has never seen an osteoderm.
>>728902095who wouldve plucked a t-rex?
>this is effeminate
>>728902305
>>728902358
>>728883626evolutionists are desperate to make people actually believe dinosaurs existed so they keep trying to make them look realistic.never gonna happen. dinosaurs are just as real as godzilla. the more they try to force realism on them the more retarded they become. just leave them as cool looking monsters and say good enough.
>>728902360So you're saying you reject what science is saying for your own personal fanfiction? How very creationist of you.
>>728902360you still need a feather on one of the many t-rex fossils.
>>728902358>>728902420>>728901705>>728900651>>728896143
>>728902358>>728902420Eagles are cool, they're just not cool like dinosaurs are. Bringing dinosaurs down to the level of eagles just doesn't work.
>if you think dinosaurs have feathers you're a creationist!I'm a creationist and I don't think they were feathered.
>>728902095Who plucked the T-rex corpse after it died? God?
>>728884726It's Amerifats who thought Jurassic Park was a documentary with real-life footage. Smaller theropod dinosaurs generally having feathers is just an accepted mundane fact in first-world nations.
>>728902519bad luck to kill a sea bird
>>728902721Dumb euro-trash.>>728902065
>>728892292that's like dismissing reptiles by saying "visualize a 2 ton lizard" that aint scary either
>>728902830>amerimutt reading comprehension strikes againSad.
>>728902830seething circumcised muttoid
>>728902095
>>728895608Ogres and gnomes are magical creatures that transcend natural laws. The terms do not refer to large or small people beyond as a derogatory comparison.
>>728902721
Look at this awesome dude. He is neither a lizard, or a dinosaur.
>>728900276and when basilosaurus was named people thought it was a reptile when in fact it's a whaleinitial names matter for shit
>birdtranny postingoh brother, is there an animal more trannycoded? (besides sharks)
>>728902721You just know that if it didn't have "*not actual size" then some fat southern couple would go up to the counter and start bitching "WELL IT'S REAL BIG UP ON THA SIGN, THIS IS FALSE ADVERTISIN'! I NEED TO SEE YER MANAGER"
>>728896143see, you look at that bald fucker and all I see is a beaked dinosaur with unprominent scalesgive it a non-beaked mouth and it's just a dinosaur, put feathers on it it's a feathered dinosaurI will not be convinced that dinosaurs were not seasonally feather-optional in theropod species that did not have sufficient body mass to already be insulated by it alone
>>728903036Jurassic Park dinosaurs are literally tranniesBirds have intensely defined male and female sexes
>>728883626>game has feathered dinosaursAaaand kissed.
>>728903019>Maybe if you were circumcised you'd be smart enoughSHALOM
>>728903031Yeah, way back then people literally thought of dinosaurs as cold blooded monsters and the inspiration of beasts of myth like dragons. They were all seen as flawed out of date beings who were slow and drab animals with floor dragging tails and lizard-like looks.
>>728903209Sounds like Golden Age thinking if you ask me.
>sudden digression into pro-circumcision nonsequitursis the baiting dino scaletist... of the (((tribe?))) there's no way, right? but it'd explain the absolutely obsessive neurotic reposting...
>>728903123i'd prefer an answer from anyone but the birdtroon
>>728903209and that sort of thinking lasted a long time, even in the 90's there were still people like Jack Horner who tried to downplay dinosaurs like T. Rex, seeing them as outdated and therefor they had to be slow, it was impossible for a predator that size to be nimble and smart because mammals can't reach that size while being nimble and smartmodern paleontology treats dinosaurs largely like animals while trying to minimize bias, that means if it turns out some of them had feathers they'll get feathers, also means if it turns out some of them were far stronger and faster than initially assumed, they'll be represented as such
>>728883626>complaining about muh feathers and not how they didn't add super crocs to the "Wetlands" dlc.
>>728902721Everything you know about dinosaurs comes from America.
>>728903510>complaining about muh crocs when there are barely any Triassic species
Reminder that birds are BASED and 90% socially monogamous vs mammals, who are like 3 - 5% and reptiles almost all just abandon their children to fend for themselves or the parents eat them.
>>728903398I mean, that's still how we think about coelopysis these days we even have some ideas of what their vision was like and they had accurate binocular vision characteristic of a archosaur predator rather than lizard-like eyesight
>>728903594I wish we'd get all the weird early-mid triassic species that era is basically cambrian explosion 2.0
>>728903682Alligators are known for their strong parental care, you mongoloid.
>>728903594>>728903763Herrerasaurus isn't in the base game? Granted I think Frontier isn't going to do much effort for Evo 3 because of Planet Zoo 2.
>>728903594This is a good point, why the FUCK are they so concerned about adding Chinasaurs and feathered species when there are hardly any triassic dinosaurs/reptiles in the game?Where the FUCK is Plateosaurus and Mussaurus? Eoraptor? Postosuchus? Tanystropheus? Hello?
>>728903682I agree, my trans-girlfriend loves birds, she even has an OC of one with surgical scars.
>>728903682nah crocs love their babies and will even gently scoop them up into their mouth and carry them around.
>>728903425>brings up circumcision>gets thrown right back in his face>"Help, help, I'm being oppressed by the JEWS!"Retarded schizos LEAVE.
>>728903682Birds are reptiles
>DNA samples>"This creature had scales/leather hide>'Experts'>"NOOO IT HAD FEATHERS ALL DINOSAURS HAD FEATHERS REEEEEE *shits pants*
>>728884680I disagree. Feathers can function as additional armor on their already tough hides.
>>728904070No they aren't. Birds are Aves, Reptiles are Reptilia.
>>728891287the majority of normies think of dinosaurs as fantasy creatures invented by jurassic park so when they see a feathered dinosaur its seen as a personal attack on their childhood instead of an alternate interpretation of a real animal that lived millions of years ago based on modern knowledge of the subjecton this site in particular tho you'd probably get a lot of retards telling you dinosaurs never existed to begin with
>>728904203You feather faggots spit out the same script over and over.
>>728904203That's because when they add feathers to them, they make them look like hyper-faggotized flamboyant homosexuals. If they want to use the "ACKSHUALLY" card, then they should present what they would have actually looked like, other-wise they're just as wrong as the scalefags.Feathered dinosaurs would have mostly looked like this.
>>728902858
>>728904364because its literally true.
>>728904594For raptors yeah
>>728904484it depends. the idea of dinosaurs having colorful feathers obviously comes from modern birds. i think its possible that some dinos had colorful feathers while others had more mundane coats, while others still might not have had any at all or very sparse coverage. if t-rex had feathers all over its body it would probably die from overheating.
>>728884541This fag has never seen an emu or cassowary.
>>728904886oversized chickens that run from you
>>728904962>that run from youBoth emus and cassowaries will run AT you and eviscerate you.
>>728904871I'm referring primarily to the density of their plumage. People are drawing feathers on them like they're fucking penguins.
>>728901040Yeah but the smaller raptors are the exception in that regard definitely being heavily feathered
>>728905026scaredy birds that flee
>>728905026Emu's are two IQ points above brain dead. You could whack one in the head with a shovel and be done with it.
>>728905029i havent seen anything like that, unless you are talking about shit like >>728896723 which is obviously a joke
>>728905102And? They are still very dangerous birds.
>>728904886
>>728883626 based non feather enjoyers
>>728905228Because the cassowary is basically the raptors from Jurassic Park (movie).
>>728905164>There is evidence that the cassowary may have been domesticated by humans thousands of years before the chicken.Yeah no. cows (not bulls) have probably killed more humans by accidentally trampling.
>>728905395>There is evidence that the cassowary may have been domesticated by humans thousands of years before the chickenYeah right. Show me this evidence.
>>728905262No they aren't.The raptors are smart, actually kill multiple people and don't look gay as fuck.
>>728905262Except they aren't at all, because Velociraptors didn't have beaks, and had claws, you retard.
>>728905445https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassowary#Relationship_with_humans
>>728905457Those raptors are fictional villains.>>728905513I said show me the evidence. Not link to fucking wikipedia.
>>728905542You can read it yourself retard
>implying dinosaurs had feathers
>>728905445One of the only recorded deaths by a cassowary was an elderly Florida man who kept it like a pet chicken. The bird only killed him because he tripped and fell and it startled the retard bird into attacking him.
>>728884541>>728884680This is the kind of thing you say when you've never seen animals in real life. Reptiles are the dumbest animals on Earth, they are dumber than retarded their brains are so underdeveloped they literally don't even have the capability to be retarded because they basically act entirely on instinct due to their tiny shitty brains. Birds can at least display higher levels of intelligence, learning, social hierarchy, tool use, flight migration patterns, long term memory, ability to recognize faces including human faces, observational learning, communication, object permanence, self awareness, etc.A dinosaur that is the dumbest fucking creature alive isn't scary, an intelligent predator, which is exactly how they are portrayed in ALL media, books, movies, vidya, Jurassic Park, Dino Crisis, everything portrays them as smart. Nothing at all like an actual reptile brain would behave.
>>728905584I did. And the source for the quote is from CNN.Go fuck yourself.
>>728883626>game has feathered dinosaursFucking basedEat shit scalies
>>728905629Oh boy here we go
>>728896297>>728897658>>728901263>T. rex>scaly skin
>>728905625>reptiles aren't intellige-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-zGIS-WWZQ
>>728905665>new study showsInstant giveaway its a lie.
>>728905625This has got to be one of the most retarded posts I've ever read. It's clear birdfags have an agenda and don't actually like animals enough to know how fucking stupid making a post like this is.
>>728898163Talk dumb, get the thumb.
>>728905723as opposed to steve irwin who told you they were heckin deadly animals?
>>728905457damn it's almost like they were paid actors
>>728905823Steve Irwin is vastly more trustworthy than CNN.CNN has a long track record of blatant lies.
>>728905723>every new piece of knowledge that came out after i turned into an adult is a LIE!!
>>728905873>The southern cassowary has been responsible for at least two human deaths. The first recorded fatality occurred in 1926 in Australia, and the second happened in Florida in 2019.lol
>>728905886No just everything in the last 10 or so years.
>>728905935yes yes when zoe quinn or something i know
>>728906013No just when Trump mindbroke the entire western world.
>>728906013Maybe Zoe Quinn slept with the cassowary
>>728891104The feathers on dinosaurs are like pic related, ignore all the BS colourful shit
>>728906531No, dinosaurs clearly had colorful plumage, you're retarded.
>>728896543>does nothing>winsyour perfect lifeform sir
>>728896543Why did these lazy fucks survive utter devastation while dinosaurs didn't? Doesn't add up.
>>728885559my question is this: how did multiple cultures (all not in contact with each other often or at all) come up with the idea of dragons as flying, fire-breathing reptiles if dragons didn't exist?
>>728906726No Dinosaurs had primitive feathers and I'm tired of fags making shit up
>>728895568>Doesn't mean that those are real either.found the lying kike
>>728907014Nope, sorry, they looked like parrots and peacocks and you're just gonna have to get used to it, dipshit.
>>728907081I get you're being facetious but we still have them all over Australasia and they should be used as evidence
>>728907250Cute cope, we all know you're just being a science denier at this point.
>>728906870Crocs just sit in a river and wait for food to come to them, either living or floating downstream. They have extremely low metabolisms and can do hibernation. Also, probably a lot of species of crocodiles did go extinct. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_szMq4hXJuc
>>728884726>>728884814Americans invented dinosaurs to sell toys though, they never existed
>>728885079
>>728905672>Acktually they are bumpsSoft skin with bumps hardly survive millions of years. That T rex skin fossil is scaly. And if T Rex do have have feathers, the feathers should be the thing to remain instead of skin.
Jurassic Park chads will continue winning.
