>Turning off the "Hair" practically doubles the FPS and in some cases looks outright better (when it gets wet in the rain)Are there any other examples of poorly programmed/fucked up graphical settings?
>i NEED 20 more fps in a cutscene or its UNPLAYABLE!!!please understand that there's no impact on hairworks in normal gameplay when the character is further away from view
>>728922415No it definitely effects the game when you're just walking around. My FPS is now over 100 when it hovered 70-80 during some of the heavier sections
>58x2 =78!
>>728922353Hair rendering is one of the weakest aspect of modern graphics though. High poly models is the biggest sin in modern games. It's a waste when Unreal Engine 5 can't even render realistic lighting. Every game looks like claymation.
>>728922353what's going on here
>>728923220What
>>728923371that's what I want to knowfor some reason rikaichamp not only recognizes this picture as japanese writing for some reason (doesn't usually happen), but also translates it to baskin robbins
>>728923220>hovering over "317" in the file size causes it to match 31>31 refers baskin-robbins
>>728922415That extra 20fps will make the scene much more pleasing to the eye than unnoticeable improvements in how hair strands move
Anyway, I'd love to hear about fucked up graphical options, because this RE4 remake setting is shockingly shitty for essentially no benefit.
>>728923925anything RT related..3 rooms will look better at the cost of a constant fps reduction
>>728924064Yeah you nailed the RT thing. In a walking sim game you might stop and stare, but in anything actiony, why the hell are you staring long enough to say "ew thats ugly" (it's not ugly, you're just being gay)
I hate video games
