What
he took his adam's apple too
>>728924830It looks like the answer is 0:https://www.reddit.com/r/HoMM/comments/1gyohyc/help_with_riddle/
ITS OVER NINE THOUSAND!!!!!!!
>>728924830Yeah but whats the actual answer? Is it zero? You can't have negative apples. I don't think they have debt in Enroth
>google image search>reddit>itoddler filenameWhy can't you retards just kill yourselves?
>>728924830If you get the answer wrong the sphinx eats your hero.
>>728924830I assume this is programmers logic? the first apple would have been number 0?
>>728924830Twenty OneSix Seven
>>728925024why would I kms when I can make retards like you seethe :3
It's three, it never says the robber took them from the boy
>>728925416You are clearly not OP, newfag. He is too retarded to turn off auto capitalization on his phone.Lurk moar.
Thinking on this, it would be really funny if burglers could steal more than you had causing you to incur debt to the thieves
>>728924830He because indebted for -1
>>728925883Cool it with antisemitism.
>>728924830>tfw the robber puts you in apple debt
>robber gives you an apple just so he has more to take away
>>728924830Three or more.
>>728926360
>>728926336good thing i use android
>>728925008The boy still has three apples, the Robber took four apples from the tree as well, It's just worded to make you think the boy got robbed
>>728924830I'm an esl but it's obviously four apples that robber has, learn to read
>>728926547>robber took four of THEMnope, it's clearly refering to the apples the boy had
>>728926472kek
>>728926590I talked to the sphinx, the robber and the boy never met
>>728924830Who's "he"?
It could be anything. If the boy already had apples in his possession then it could be thousands of apples. If you assume the robber would take all, it would be 0. Also if the robber took his Adam's apple it would be 0. If the robber took apples from the tree it would be 3, but the last sentence is ambiguous and could be referring to the robber instead so it would be 4.Trash riddle.
>>728926785Has
>>728925591> if burglers could steal more than you had causing you to incur debtIf they could do that then they wouldn't be called burglars, they'd be called banks or the government.
>>728927027
>>728924830Three.It didn't say "the robber took four of them FROM THE BOY".
>>728926785Him. He's a bastard.
3, the robber took 4 from the tree.
>>728924830Seven. The boy and the robber is the same person
>>728924830obviously he has 2,147,483,648 apples
>>728924830"He left with" = 10
>>728927397How can you steal from yourself?
>>728926472Love this nigga
>>728924830the answer is 0. either the boy took 3 apples from the tree but had another apple from some other source (robber took four) or "the boy was robbed of his apples" and "the robber took four" is just his total haul so he took all of the boys apples + 1 more from another source (robber took four)
>>728927479Because you can't? So you rob from someone's apple tree instead?
>>7289248300 apples but 1 paid of water fetched
>>728925591>anon discovers extortion
>>7289248307000
>>728924830>one person does all the labor, literally finding the fruits of his labor>man who did nothing gets to take the apples as the laborer is tired and cannot fight back>Capitalists will defend the robber
>>728928485Then he gets killed by a sentient statue for the crime of being robbed, fucked up
>>728928485Because like Starship Troopers says, violence is the supreme authority
>>728924830The robber took four of them as in the three apples and the boy, a total of four items that the robber took.
>>728924830Three because the robber took four apples from the tree, not the boy.
7The boy and robber are the same person.You would know if you paid attention to the background lore.
>>7289248303. The boy picked 3 apples off the tree, the robber stole 4 apples off the tree while the boy was going home. The boy still has 3 apples.
