[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: COD.png (2.73 MB, 1920x1080)
2.73 MB
2.73 MB PNG
The Great Debate and it's actually a close debate
>>
same game
>>
>>728949734
i say the same when any rollslop games are discussed
>>
>>728949665
4 was more incredible at the time and better balanced with the weapons and perks. Better stages too.
MW2 had a lot of fun good shit in it, like the custom tags and emblems, but it was an unbalanced glorious mess. It didn't fix COD4's biggest flaw, which was the horrible matchmaking and spawnkill on maps.
>>
>>728949665
4 was the classic for me but mw2 did improve on the formula slightly
blops 1 and 2 are still peak cod tho
>>
>>728949665
MW 1 had better multi-player
>>
>>728949665
I played MW2 first and I wasn't very impressed with MW1 when I went back to it. I have to pick MW2 for nostalgia. I still remember having my friend over every weekend and just binging MW2 splitscreen for hours, good times.
>>
>>728949665
cod4 had dedicated servers on pc + you could crack the entire gaem
mw2 introduced consoleslop p2p servers on hosts machine and made it so host could run server side cheats

mw1 easily, mw2 was beginning of the end consoletarding it up

consolesloppers need not share their opinion
>>
>>728949665
4 was better. MW2 is when CoD became console slop, I boycotted it and never bought a CoD game again.
>>
1 is a contrarian pick. 2 has way more stuff all around and as we know more is always better.
>>
>>728949665
I'm usually a "singleplayer over multiplayer" guy but CoD is the only exception, none of the campaigns enthralled me, very generic plots and gameplay...
>>
>>728949665
Modern Warfare 2 was better.
It took everything CoD4 had and improved upon it.
If you played them both at the time then you know it’s true too.
>>
>>728949665
They were both good, I did like mw2 more though personally
t. 2012 trickshot kiddo
>>
File: cod boof.jpg (34 KB, 375x375)
34 KB
34 KB JPG
cod4 was dark and gritty
mw2 was top tier baycore acction

waw was brutal and atmospheric
bo1 was fun cold war thriller

and then the series stopped having interesting stories
only cold war has since then been good
>>
>>728949665
COD4 is a fine game but it does not hold a candle to MW2 in my view, at least when it comes to multiplayer
Double the weapons, riot shield, akimbo, shotguns actually worth something past spitting distance, nearly everything is viable
>>
4.
I just don't enjoy MW2
>>
never understood the appeal of these games, 3 hours of running and gunning, 2 of which are unskippable cutscenes about the dullest shit ever, dogshit graphics, braindead multiplayer, awful gunplay and movement
>>
>>728951623
This.
>>
>>728949665
Singleplayer: 4
Multiplayer: MW2
>>
>>728952053
I'm guessing you're 14 or so.
>>
>auto aim
>showing enemies on the minimap
>regenerative health
>no recoil
>grenade indicators
>levelling and xp
>ultra low ttk
>small maps
Call of Duty 2 and everything after it is ultra casual console trash designed around the limitations of controllers, televisions, and retards.
>>
File: cod vang.jpg (117 KB, 637x787)
117 KB
117 KB JPG
i really hope they stop making games after mw4 next year
stop games and focus on movies for a while
cod movies could become very popular

and then maybe return to games in the 2030s
>>
>>728952264
cowadoody brehs ong ong
>>
>>728949923
>It didn't fix COD4's biggest flaw, which was the horrible matchmaking
LOL? LMAO?
Cod 4 had dedicated servers, mw2 had shitty lobby system where you could only pick your gametype no number of players no map etc.
Lose of dedicated servers was biggest downgrade of call of duty.
>>
CoD1 and 4 were both mind blowing for their times in terms of graphics and spectacle. The nightvision level in 4 was pretty cool.
>>
>>728952489

except you made clear from the start that you don't know what you're talking about
>>
>>728949665
I tried to play 4 then the 360 fucked up and burnt a ring on the disk and ruined it so I couldn't finish the game.
Haven't tried since.
Mw2 was kino though.
>>
>>728954114
ramirez stop posting and press X to detonate the c4 load in an awesomez cutscene right fucking now XD
>>
>>728949665
2 had a better and more memorable campaign. There's a reason that when people talk about 4 it's only All Ghillied Up and Mile High Club
>>
>>728949665
MW2 was better than COD4, but MW2 only works after playing COD4.
On terms of MP MW2 is just better but both share the same shit spawn system.
>>
>>728952264
>used to be only 14 year olds liked call of duty
>now disliking call of duty means you must be 14
>>
Genuinely tough but split screen spec ops takes the win
>>
>>728949665
4 had better maps. Shipment was always a fun chaotic mess.
>>
>>728949665
I stopped playing after mw1. One of the few people still holding onto the boycott
>>
>>728956535
Boycott of what?
>>
File: WAW_Cover_Art.jpg (70 KB, 270x371)
70 KB
70 KB JPG
>>728949665
Neither.
This was the thinking man's CoD.
>>
>>728956350
because an adult can tell that both of theses are actually fun games
>>
>>728956867
great apart from the mp40 just being broken OP and everyone using it
>>
>>728949665
MW2's story is absolute aids. It makes 0 sense whatsoever.
>>
>>728956867
based



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.