>>728968113
>destroy them with energy weapons and it's even more profit margin for you
You can't bring up the money aspect of older AC games because the AC6 trannies on this board will have a meltdown

>>728968113
>are we the baddies?

>>728968113
Are there more games like this on PC besides AC6? I loved AC6 but getting kinda tired of it. Not a fan of the PS1 controls though, like kb+m.

>>728969409
didnt you apply the control adjustment or use the analog patch? theres a remap button in the options of those games

Nightreign is a bit of an odd game to me since the whole format of the game seems like it would lend itself to an AC game far, far better.
>AC game which is 1-3 player co-op
>Takes place on massive maps, (well, massive in scale but in gameplay terms not much bigger than Nightreign map since ACs have overboost etc), if you want to use the whole "similar map with different points of interest" make it take place on Grid sections
>The classic Fortnite ring, but instead of rain you start out being targeted by swarms of enemies, (which give no reward), eventually if you stay in the Fortnite ring too long they start lobbing cruise missiles at you and eventually orbital strikes
>Make the maps a 2 up to 4 way battlefield between corpos, PCA, RLF, etc, your Contract at mission select can potentially make one team your ally
>Instead of a rush to loot and level up, it's a rush to complete side objectives to bolster your client faction, so on the day 3 equivalent "boss" it's, for example, "Scale The Wall" but with a truly absurd number of defenders and the number of attacking allied MTs to act as distractions etc depends on how many side objectives you complete

A lack of some kind of "level up" system and custom ACs instead of set characters would require some effort to balance though, else it'd just end up as 2x shotgun/2x songbird cookie cutter builds everywhere.

>>728968246
How bad are you at the game if you have to min-max your expenses?