Well?
>>729059425>60 too blurry>120 too unnaturally sharp30 is best and most realistic.
>>729059425thats a still image
>>729059545.png's usually tend to be, yes.
Am I retarded or is RDR2 actually like, uhh, fine at 30 FPS? I literally don't feel the frames if you know what I'm saying.
>>729059425if you need more than 30fps you are ngmi when the internet apocalypse wipes out modern gaming
30 is perfectly fine if you aren't a snob with more money than brain cells. Hell, 20 is acceptable.
>>729059425frames aren't something measured by still pictures. they are measured by moving pictures. Can you stop making this stupid fucking retarded thread already? Cunt
>>72905942559.85 > 59.97 >> 60 FPS >>>>>>>>>>> anything else
60, i don't play fast paced first person shooters so don't need more. My PC components will last me longer too, which is nice given the absolute state of pc parts now. I'll just upgrade from my 7800XT to whatever the next AMD xx800/80xt is
>>72905960460fps turns everything into zoomershootershow terrible
left>right>middle
>>729059609I remember playing it on ps4 pro and that was probably the smoothest 30fps i've ever experienced.
>>729059425all of those will cause tearing for me so i need Vsync on but that will spike my input delay so now i need gsync on with both together and a few other settings you set it like 5 fps lower so 139fps is for me.
>>729059609You don't need high framerates for slow paced movie games. If anything 60fps would make them feel less movielike.
>>729059729I don't know, can you stop eating the bait?
Depends on monitor
>>729060137Take your snake oil back to the audiophile forums
>>729060221He's not wrong tho.
>>729059609if the gameplay is slow than 30 is fine.
360-500hz is the sweet spot
>mfw playing CP2077 at 100+fps with path tracing thanks to framegen. Given the input lag is noticeable at first, you surprisingly get used to it pretty quickly.
>>729060221There are all the downsides, and the fact you more or less can emulate the motion clarity of CRT using a shader created by this very own website.But the fact is the fact
>>729059425I like to cap my frame rate at 80 or 90 depending on how hard the game is to run or how high I have my resolution set. Easier to run than 120 and feels far better than 60.
So the red pill is that we are wasting massive performance running games over 60 fps, just because monitors and TVs suck ass and introduce all of the blur
>>729062575game should always be capped to what your 1% lows are so you get a totally stable frame time experience.
>>729059425that's a train not a well dumbass
>>729062705The train is not the only thing in the image, this particular combination of things is called a well.
>>729059425literally can't tell the difference between all threethis proves videogames are a scam
>/v/ posers claim old games looked and played better when everything ran at like 30 fps at most, especially 2D games>same posers claim anything under 144 fps is unplayable dogshitinteresting
>>729059653South America or India?
>>729062909See>>729060137Old games were smoother than 240fps games
>>729062909because modern games rely heavily on long winded animations for basic character movements and every game now needs some type of physics engine where everything becomes overly sluggish at lower fps.
>>729059425hello saar
