Unlike the other PS2 villains and their being reinforced by the themes of consumerism, Nefarious isn't backed up by any strong theming. Maybe you could argue racial inequality is supposed to be his theme, but we never actually see robots being treated unfairly in 3 or any of the other PS2 games for that matter. It makes him come off as very shallow and empty as an antagonist. He's just an over the top comic book supervillain doing what he does because he can, which feels like a step down from the more grounded villains of the other PS2 games.
>>729135732nigga. can you shut the fuck up already?
>>729135732>the more grounded villains of the other PS2 games.
I know the answer is>they didn't actually play the gameBut what's this weird assertion that Ratchet and Clank are commentaries when Gadgetron didn't do jack shit in 1 and the game is more about the Solana Galaxy getting rolled by the Blarg, 2's a revenge plot by quark and megacorp being sort of unethical is set dressing, and the plot of 3 is intentionally starting race riots and robotomizing everyone so he can take control over the Galaxy.If anything the games were anti-commentaryLike the closest thing to commentary is Deadlocked, and "media is run by corrupt fuckheads" is BARELY commentary.
>>729135732>He's just an over the top comic book supervillain doing what he does because he canfucking based beyond belief
>>729136387the twist is even better when you realize that's why mr Fizzwidget has the same voice as Qwark and not because the devs were lazy/had no money to hire another voice actor
