I'm a poorfag and pc gaming is my poorfag hobby and I don't want to be priced out of it.

>>729166589
I'm poor. Buy me a better monitor, and I'll use it.

File: 1000012885.gif (3.9 MB, 476x452)

3.9 MB GIF

>>729166589
Because im paying for home renovation and cant affort anything in the next year.

>>729166589
I game on 1080p 240hz thoughbeit

what a shitty thread
"why havent you spent money you dont have on your hobby"

>>729166589
I'm poor.
I don't play modern slop.

>>729166589
if you need to invent imaginary people getting converted to your church from the get go, you probably don't have a really solid point to begin with, cultist

my laptop has a 240hz screen, its not a night and day difference, another useless meme

I don't play nu-gen AAA stuff, so to me, it doesn't make a difference.
I would rather just keep my 4 monitor setup of 1080p 60 hz screens.

i dont care anymore

>>729166856
>laptop
Well its probably one of those 15ms panels and it runs at 60hz unless plugged into the wall and a game is running

I'm still on 1080p but I upgraded to 180hz, I don't think it's necessary but it's still a nicer experience playing games smoother and looking more sharp, especially older ones.

>>729166589
>Get stronger rig
>Games are junk half baked glitched messes
Nah

Going above 60fps is for compfags only
Why would I need 240fps for a singleplayer game?

File: 1740678499857691.gif (2.14 MB, 255x255)

2.14 MB GIF

>>729166589
>1080p
>165hz

>>729166589
1080p 60fps is all you need

>>729167519
Less blur unless ur a crt faggot

File: Samsung-SyncMaster-2333SW(...).jpg (24 KB, 768x576)

24 KB JPG

>>729166589
>1920x1080
>60hz
>60fps

I don't need more

>>729166589
I mostly play old games; it would be a monumental waste of money

>>729166796
that's a prime case for higher refresh? old games run at 200fps on toasters.

>>729167519
60hz is shit even for desktop use. I don't believe people are still on 60hz in this day and age, I got my first 120hz monitor 15 years ago and you can get them for like $100 these days.

>>729166589
Because no modern GPU can run games at 24O FPS with everything on ultra plus ray tracing. And 240 fps will not make you game look better than 60 FPS with everything on ultra

File: raype.jpg (86 KB, 1024x710)

86 KB JPG

>>729168023
I got a 120hz crua for $300 petrodolans.

>4k at 60 fps
>1080p at locked 144 fps

I'm currently facing this problem.

File: 1603122138941.webm (214 KB, 596x720)

214 KB WEBM

>>729166589
i don't, i game on 1080p 180hz.

>>729168228
Why would you lie, nigger.

>>729167980
I had one of these that lasted me 9 years, pretty good imo.

>>729166589
I haven't seen a difference between 60fps and 120fps despite owning a screen doing the latter. Thankfully I haven't spent a difference compared to other PC screens in the 150€ ~ 200€ range.
And besides, only like two or three games I own actually support that refresh rate. I'm also not allergic to 30fps either due of my long experience in games.

>>729166589
What would I do with a 240hz monitor when no game can maintain stable 60fps?

>>729166589
Do you really need more than 60 though?

>>729168260
Seems pretty expensive still, maybe at 150 I would do it
been remodeling my house, so that is the priority for now

>>729166589
I game on 1080p 240hz

File: 1763170957130483.png (1.27 MB, 1024x993)

1.27 MB PNG

>tfw 4k 144hz

File: 1756728494810472.jpg (237 KB, 1080x1080)

237 KB JPG

>>729166589
>5K2K 165hz

File: dick.png (285 KB, 1031x735)

285 KB PNG

>>729166589
120 should have been the fucking standard by now but due to hardware prices we soon might actually regress back to 30. Fuck AI techbros and their Jewish overlords I just wanted to play videogames in peace but apparently that is too much to ask for.

>>729166589
I don't
for christmas I gifted myself a 32inch oled 240hz monitor from alienware

>>729166796
>>729168131
This. Everyone knows only games made past 2021 support higher than 60fps.

>>729166589
Meh. I have a 144hz laptop, but have gone down to 60hz for the frames.

>>729166589
Just because your eyes see in 60 fps doesn't mean they're catching every frame of a 60hz monitor. For that argument to make sense, the refresh rate of your eyeballs would have to be perfectly synced up to your monitor, which of course is not how reality works.

1440p 180hz screens are $150 these days

>>729169071
God damn, you must've cured cancer and taken out the garbage this year. Good on you anon.

>>729169391
I have a job
maybe you should get one too haha

>>729168334
You can do both on a 4k display

Fell for the framerate fad. My 144hz monitor is now capped at 60. Also, 1080p. Anything more is a meme.

>>729166589
60Hz on a crt is still better than 1000Hz on modern monitors

>>729169596
CRTfags really are this delusional huh?

I'm waiting for cheap gen4 oled

>>729169824
Are you surprised?
No one likes this faggots, so the only way they can get attention is with these garbage opinions

>>729169514
Not with my graphics card. It's actually driving me a bit nuts, do I want it to look sharp or silky smooth? It's a real problem. I keep switching. I have this problem with several games, usually if the game is nothing special visually or doesn't have highres textures anyway better have it be smooth, if it looks great then go for res. If it's a simple game, yes I can have both and don't need to bother debating this shit with myself.

>>729166589
What's the issue with it?

File: 1765828257517732.png (679 KB, 868x1024)

679 KB PNG

>>729166589
I game on 768p, 50 hz

File: 1754671349580001.gif (2.65 MB, 374x369)

2.65 MB GIF

>game at 1080p 240hz
>run game occasionally at 4k downscaled when I want it to look pretty or when I want to take nice screenshots
1080p is king

>>729168260
kys eurocuck

>4K OLED 240hz
>Cyberpunk 2077
>Path Tracing ON
>HDR ON
>4K DLSS QUALITY
>Frame Gen ON
Yep, it's ludokino time

>>729166589
ez explanation, it's not illegal to game on 1080p 60hz. No one is hunting down 1080p gamers and executing them and throwing their bodies in mass graves currently. so until that time comes, I'm going to keep playing in this stable format.

>>729170773
>>4K DLSS QUALITY
>>Frame Gen ON
why even have a 4k monitor at that point rumao

>>729166589
>get 240Hz monitor
>game still play at 60FPS
>nothing changed
daily reminder, only buy a monitor with Hz that can match your average FPS, anything beyond that is useless

>>729167519
Going from 60 to 144 is like night and day, but i genuinely think anything else is overkill

Because not everything can be ran at above 60 and since that's not possible I would rather just have a consistent experience instead. 60 is good enough.

>>729166589
No

(:<

>>729166589
I only have so many pixels. So I live with it.

I own two different monitors and have them set up to my Switch 2 and PC. The 1440p 165hz one is for my Switch 2, and I settle for 1080p 60hz on my PC. 1080p 60 is really all you need to have a good time, hell I've even seen someone argue 720p is enough. What I really miss between the two monitors is the 1080p one has no HDR.

>>729168403
We don't sign our posts here

>>729166589
because the frames are real

>>729171147
at 4k you can't even run path tracing without upscaling, and 60+ frames is impossible without framegen

>>729166589
>buy an expensive monitor that requires a 3x stronger gpu to maintain the same fidelity
>why?
>because you just should, okay? you can feel the minor difference in person
>just SPEND THE MONEY
>CONSUME PRODUCT ALREADY
>BUY MY SHITTTT

>>729166589
i'm content with what i have and going out of my way to set a new standard would be retarded

>>729166589
I game on 4k 60hz and I don't need more. I could have more but I would have to sacrifice graphics and it's not worth it to me. I don't play fps games so I really have no need for more.

I just remembered watching a review for home theater equipment and when he started talking about frame rate he said that the device supports up to 120 but that scientists are unsure if a human can perceive frame rates past 24
Never clicked off anything so fast

My eye sight isn't amazing so 1080/144hz on a 27 inch screen is fine. The higher frame rates with less effort is a nice bonus. I'm tempted to jump to 2k or 4k at 32 inch but I'll wait for another generation or so of hardware.

>>729166589
I do 1080 with 120 to 165hz. Resolution doesnt matter.

I just bought a new 1080p/120hz monitor and it has dead pixels

>>729167915
>less blur
Don't pretend the faggots falling for the 240hz meme actually bother to turn off Motion Blur, Chromatic Aberration, and Depth of Field.

Anything past 80 isn't noticeable to me really vidually, but I can feel my mouse smoothness increase.

>>729167519
for smooth gameplay

File: Bro.png (32 KB, 543x561)

32 KB PNG

Because I'm in a small room, after I move I'll buy a 1440P

>I'm le poorfag
>Is able to afford a $300 toaster
No you're just CHEAP!

File: 1735474020019253.gif (362 KB, 400x328)

362 KB GIF

I'm afraid to get too used to it and not being able to go back to 60fps

>>729166589
It just works

I've been playing PS4 the past 10 years and just put together a mid tier PC with a 9060 xt and ordered this monitor that was on sale
>https://www.walmart.com/ip/Acer-Nitro-27-Full-HD-2560-x-1440-Gaming-Monitor-with-AMD-FreeSync-Premium-Technology-240Hz-1ms-VRB-VG272U-W2biip/16457002155
I'm sure I'll be disgusfor not doing it sooner really

File: Monitor275.jpg (1.38 MB, 3000x2522)

1.38 MB JPG

I know dogshit about monitors but since this thread is here can someone tell me how decent this screen is? I got it for free from my brother since he bought a new one for his PC. He says its more then enough for console gaming

I have a 240hz monitor and I don't really notice any difference after around 100fps

File: 151545.jpg (177 KB, 1491x850)

177 KB JPG

I bought this shit last month and it's even cheaper now than it was on "le Black Friday sale :)))". I still haven't taken it out of the box and have a receipt. Going from 1080 60hz to this. Did I fuck up? I don't know, but I have until the 15th to realize I did and return it.

most games I'm interested in are designed around 60, ultimately going to 120fps would just make the majority of those look like crap for one cool experience with a random fps.

any decent game runs closer to 60 than 144

notice how it's only free to play slop with gacha and micro transactions that are optimised

>>729166589
i don't play pvp games and 60hz is plenty

>>729169567
more than 1080p is a meme for video but not real time rendering.

>>729179776
You're a stupid nigger, just admit it.

>>729179735
Your return policy is also your price protection policy. You can go in and get the difference back to your original payment method.

Because I mostly play old games and either they don't run above 60, or have issues when you run them above 60. Whenever I play new games, I'd rather just jack up all the settings and stay at 60 then hit some arbitrary new 'standard.' I even play tons of games at 30 because of emulation and I usually don't even notice.

I have to admit I can't reaaaally tell between 120 and 240
I can tell in very controlled situations but not if I just picked up a game
30 and 60 is super easy, 60 and 120 is easy, 120 and 240 is basically impossible
It makes sense since at this point we're talking about 4 milliseconds

>>729179984
so indiana jones and the great circle is a certified 10/10, right?

>>729166589
Because i have a 1080p 60hz plasma. That's why.
And because it's a plasma, there is literally zero motion blur, so it 1080 60hz on a plasma looks sharper and clearer than 240hz on an LCD/OLED.

>>729180732
there's a reason plasma screens died out anon...

>>729166589
It's the frozen pizza analogy. You can go through your whole life eating nothing but frozen cheap pizza and think it's the greatest thing ever. Then one day you and your friends go to a pizza parlor and get a fresh made one and your perspective changes. Now you can't enjoy frozen pizza anymore, your standards have irrevocably changed.

I don't want to try out 120+hz. I know it's better. It's objectively better. But if I try it and get used to it, I'll never be able to go back to 60hz, and my demand for powerful hardware has just inflated all that much.

File: 1760744270858169.jpg (1.07 MB, 2282x1800)

1.07 MB JPG

>1080p
>180hz

I hate to throw away functional stuff and my current monitor can't be handed down to anyone. so I'm waiting for my perfectly serviceable monitor to crap out before getting a new one.
>but it looks so much better
I've been playing unmetal and escape from duckov, it's not going to make a difference.

File: 1765707087825719.gif (99 KB, 160x160)

99 KB GIF

>>729166589
>14,9 fps
>29hz

Tried 165hz, only really saw a difference if I was staring and trying to see it, 60hz is good enough for me. Eventually got 1440p instead, saw quite a bit of a difference.

>>729166589
Because games are optimized like shit nowadays. Why on earth would I put myself into an even HIGHER price bracket for frame rates I wouldnt be even be able to play universally. 60 is fine

There's absolutely no reason to ever need over 60fps unless you're playing e-sports games online.

File: 1751526064882498.mp4 (276 KB, 556x480)

276 KB MP4

>4k
>120hz+
>OLED
pick two

>>729166589
my shitty card can't push more

>>729166589
It's a hedonic treadmill. Yeah, it looks better, then you get used to it and it just starts becoming the new normal.

>>729166589
I have 165 Hz but also Linux, playing 2D games feels like it smudges frames between. It's uncanny, I didn't have this on my 60 Hz.

>>729166589
the only reason to remain at 1080p60hz nowadays is if you're just really really poor and have no money whatsoever
a 1440p 180hz ips nowadays is like 150-200 bucks, and 4k 160hz ips is 300-400 depending on brand and features

if you're too poor to earn a few hundred bucks for a piece of hardware you'll stare at for years, you're a cockroach

>>729166589
240 fps only matters in multiplayer slop. It doesn't matter for single player games where real gaming is.

>>729166589
I don't, you fucking liar. I game on 1440p @ 120Hz (ultrawide)

>>729184459
It's funny that people still call 4k unreachably expensive, when 1440p 144hz screens just 5 years ago were more expensive than 4k 160fps screens are today.

>>729184459
>a 1440p 180hz ips nowadays is like 150-200 bucks
Show us some.

>>729166589
I didn't care until I started playing rhythm games
shit looks like a slideshow at 60fps on fast songs otherwise

>>729184768
MSI G274QP is 1440p 170hz and is like 160 bucks without discounts

>>729180918
good post
my experience with a 4k 144hz monitor has been that 4k>high refresh rate. i reformatted my pc a while back and didn't realize my display settings were on 60hz for weeks, maybe i am just getting old and the difference and latency doesn't register to me any more
new games run like shit any way so often i have to choose 4k or 144hz, and i always pick 4k.

that said, old games at 4k 144hz is absolute bliss. been playing through dawn of war 2 + expacs and it's so fuckin crisp

>>729166589
I need 144hz for racist games only. 60hz is fine otherwise.

>>729166589
1440p 120Hz true neutral gang reporting

>>729166589
I prefer 4k

>>729166589
Actually the human eye can't see over 20-30 FPS. If anything above that made a difference then all the movies would go above that, but this trillion dollar industry just mysteriously doesn't care I guess.

i don't want to throw out perfectly fine working monitors and also I'm too lazy to unhook the old ones and move them

>>729185393
Well same but luckily I bought 144hz gsync monitor 11 years ago with good response time so I guess I can manage without chasing 200+.

>>729167827
Always being okay with the bare minimum and just "what you need" is incredibly pathetic.

>>729185027
When I read posts like these I just have to assume people are either trolling or really that different. 60 vs 144 is such a huge difference. Sure resolution is visible difference too, but you can adjust to it like having slightly bad vision irl. But for fps you cannot just adapt to having poor image accuracy in motion.

>>729185691
How about you get the bare minimum amount of bitches? Oh wait...

>>729184459
Just ignore the $1000 graphics card you need to actually hit those frames

>>729166589
I don't need anything higher since I only play single player games

>>729166589
but I game at 3440 x 1440 @144 hz
If I was a compfag I would go with 1080 @240 THOUGH

>>729186067
It still simply feels and looks nice, and not every single player game is over the shoulder console port.

>>729185787
im being sincere, i can instantly tell the difference in smoothness and latency when I switch, 60 fps just doesn't bother me any more

it's good enough. I doubt upgrading to a better monitor would be worth it to play the kinds of games I play anyway.

>>729185787
When you have a 4k screen, especially a large one like I do, running at less than native resolution looks like someone smeared vaseline all over it and it actually hurts my eyes.

I'd much rather have a large screen at 4k/60 than a small one at 1080/144. It took a while to adapt but I am NEVER going back to anything under 40 inches.

File: 1740913547190153.gif (55 KB, 636x299)

55 KB GIF

CRTchad here, AMA

>>729188454
>I bought a shitty television and posted a PC98 gif aren't I hip?

>>729188454
that game is shit, why are you posting it?

>>729166589
Well the hz doesn't really matter in a game if my PC is too shit to go above 30 fps, isn't it?

File: 20251222070711_1.jpg (340 KB, 1920x1080)

340 KB JPG

>>729166589
Because going above 60 Hz (really 75-90 Hz) doesn't really matter unless you're playing FPSes like that and I primarily play single player action games. I have uncapped my games to run above it, but I never really noticed any real difference outside of some loading times being really quick. Theoretically, it's a good idea but in practice it only matters in a limited number of cases. I just make sure my games never go too far below 60 FPS which is when things get bad.

Also, 1080p is a perfectly good resolution that balances image quality with GPU performance/VRAM usage well although 1440p is also a great resolution. With all the hardware shortages due to AI companies buying shit and just basic cost analysis, aiming for a GPU that can do anything above 1080p or 1440p is a genuine waste of resources.

File: 1742965917032369.jpg (100 KB, 853x480)

100 KB JPG

>>729188521
Looks like I hit a nerve merely by existing... Interesting reaction!

>>729188581
To upset you specifically, of course.

>>729166589
I game in 1080p at 144.

File: 1747393567742463.jpg (151 KB, 480x480)

151 KB JPG

I "upgraded" to 1440p from 1080p (24" to 27")
I shouldn't have
also upgraded to 165hz but 120hz is more than enough, and high fps/hz won't make a shit game become a good one

1080p 90-120hz at 24" for desk usage is perfect.
and shit matters even less the farther you're from your screen

>>729178794
yeah after being all day on 144hz 60hz feels choppy, but you know its not just your brain, modern screens are made to run at high hz, most of them shit the bed if you try to drive them at 60hz, check rtings, its a transversal issue.

>>729188439
Well if you use large screens it's different. I myself find larger screens very uncomfortable for desktop use. It feels like for every action I take I first need to move my eyes before I can even begin to think what I was about to do. And in games I constantly miss or feel that I am missing information.

>>729178794
I can game easily on high refresh rate screen and work on a different 60 Hz monitor, it doesn't bother me
Gaming on 60hz does suck though

>>729189081
That's kind of what I meant when it took a little while to adapt. It's probably not ideal for something like a competitive FPS, but it's much more immersive when you have to look around a little bit to see things. Easier to forget you're looking at a screen at all.

File: 1735619784005164.png (886 KB, 801x578)

886 KB PNG

>>729181070
>1440p
>165hz

File: 1744270534190467.jpg (40 KB, 303x566)

40 KB JPG

>>729166589
For me it's :
>2k native
>120hz
>HDR
All on an OLED monitor with great HDR and great pixel motion clarity

>>729188454
based crt user

File: 1766121838517571.gif (937 KB, 498x224)

937 KB GIF

>4k 240hz qd-oled
>pretty sure i bought same monitor as >>729169071
I won't lie, it's kinda intoxicating.

File: Super ultra wide.png (438 KB, 800x314)

438 KB PNG

I bought and returned one of these within a couple days.
Looked great in games but the fringe and slightly blurry text made it hard to program on for long periods of time.
I feel kind of bad about it desu.

>>729189461
>Ultrashort monitor
You did the right thing returning that shit. Why anyone would buy only the bottom half of a screen is beyond me.

>>729189641
I've used a 21:9 monitor for years and most games just tend to add more horizontal field of view. Very few games make it feel cramped and the ones that do (RE4R for example) have mods to fix it.

>>729166589
I actually prefer 720p, 60hz.

>>729166589
Because my eyes are trash and anything over 60 is wasted on them.

>>729189231
I don't competitively watch movies but even in movie theater I go to back because moving head and eyes is so retarded. Adjusting focus point should be enough. Wow I just missed half the screen because I was so le immersed. I unironically cannot get it.

These threads are for zoomers and third world brownoids with actual shot boxes to larp

I throw temper tantrums and smash my monitors sometimes so I don't want to get one that's too expensive

File: 1707002151143460.jpg (28 KB, 720x468)

28 KB JPG

This might just be me and the fact I have an AMD CPU but even if I have the option to take a game up to insane FPS counts I almost never do it because it makes my computer sound like a jet engine.
Its very nice when i'm just browsing but for most modern games I dont go above 90fps if I can adjust the settings manually.

>>729194138
learn how to manually adjust your fan curve with something like msi afterburner, tard

>>729194138
This is a must https://getfancontrol.com/

and if you haven't yet check *G*PU undervolting, GPU throws out a lot of hot air into the case which then heats the processor too.

>>729166589
Part of me wants to try an OLED but I'm not paying $700+ for a monitor

>>729166589
because my old ips panel (that's 1920 x 1200, thank you vey much) still has by far the best colours i've seen on a monitor that isn't four digits
i don't have four digits

>>729194138
speedfan bitch

Will a faster monitor prevent that bullshit where I push a dodge button well before I'm hit but it doesn't come out in time
If so I'll upgrade right now

>>729194138
thats because its trying to cool itself down. these components get hot, and from the sound of it youre either thermally fucked for some reason (bad thermal paste application, bad contact with cooler and cpu, etc) but my bigger issue is it sounds like you also are using the igpu (which exists inside the cpu) instead of your dgpu (the big fuckin graphics card)
fans being on is a good thing, if the load is high. if you cant cool it you could easily kill the component or it'll throttle to keep itself from dying.
if you want to reduce the strain you can cap the framerate or something, or enable vsync, or lower visual quality but it sounds to me like you have absolutely no idea how computers work either

File: 13872389312.png (43 KB, 250x196)

43 KB PNG

I understand that games don't and haven't processed game logic on a frame by frame basis since the fucking snes, and the fidelity increase isn't really worth the increased performance cost imo.
Do I look like some kind of clown to you?

>>729195732
what a retarded post

>>729195804
>when i do <demanding thing> my pc gets loud
gee i wonder fucking why

>>729195875
because of the default fan curve

File: 1764592660672446.jpg (42 KB, 798x1024)

42 KB JPG

I have two perfectly functioning monitors and consumerism is evil, so I will not purchase a new one unless I absolutely need it

>>729166589
>1080
>60
Some of the best games are 144 and I actively turn shit down to 30 if possible because I care about performance, not gwaphix.

I like games, I am not a consoomer retard ignorant of anything but numbers on pakages.

>>729166589
Last panel is him looking at his GPU wattage multiplying by 4, instantly igniting his PC case and bankrupting him with electric bills

>>729196065
anon probably got a prebuilt with a shit fan curve and doesnt even know what a fan curve is. its not even clear if hes using the igpu or dgpu, and knowing how many zoomers whine about sound its also likely hes also exaggerating and is just worried he can hear it at all
its like my old coworker that always complaiend about how shit games ran on his 3080, but when asked he mentioned he has his hdmi from the motherboard plugged in, not the gpu, and when we told him to switch it he said it ran really fuckin good but now his pc gets hot and he got scared.
like yeah retard it gets hot and fans turn on to cool it off how hard of a concept is this

>>729196335
tl;dr

>>729196080
The optimal setup is a 4k, 60hz large screen display for faggoty movie games and also movies. Then a small screen 1080p 120hz display for competitive games. This is the optimal chudha way.

>>729166856
you clearly dont have 240hz turned on. it's miles andmiles and miles smoother than 60hz

>>729166589
>explain why you still game on 1080p, 60 hz
>1080P
No impactful increase in fidelity that is gained going to 1440p or 4k
>60hz
60hz is too low. 75hz is perfect, severely diminishing returns up to 90-100hz, people saying they can tell the difference at 100+hz are lying or coping, this only mattered in games where fps was tied to some physics and required certain breakpoints to do certain movement tricks (CoD4 for example).

>>729167980
I'm using a sony bravia 32" from like 2011, is not even a monitor
I swear it looks better than current tvs

>>729196387
retards have no understanding of computers and whine about any noise

File: 1757658509198246.jpg (33 KB, 735x723)

33 KB JPG

>>729196965
1080p 144hz fag compfag here
can confirm frames stop mattering around 100 fps
>b-b-b-but i need to react 0.00001 second faster!!!
no you don't
you need to git gud at game

>>729197073
I can tell the fluidity difference even in something lik DMC5 going from 100 to 144... All games just look and feel better the higher the fps.

>>729178434
I do and have both a 144hz c5 and a 360hz qdoled its night and day difference in motion clarity esp noticable in fast games

>>729180732
And its limited to 80-100 nits
And blacks appear gray

>>729168924
>720p upscaled to 4k with dlss quality and sharpness maxed out
This isn't the own you think it is, goyboy.

>>729166589
75hz free synced > 144hz unsynched

>>729166589
My laptop's screen supports 60hz and 165hz. Cannot tell the difference between them. I keep it at 60hz to save battery and keep it cooler.

>>729197073
>compfag
Link your shit compfaggot

Higher fps together with high refresh and low response times (not input lag) leads to less and less blur until eventually we ht crt clarity in motion ontop of seeing more

>>729198256
Thats not how dlss works.
Dlss quality at 4k is exactly 3200x1800
Dlss balanced at 4k is exactly 2560x1440

>>729198440
Not him but you are wrong.
4k DLSS Q is upscaled from 1440p so 67% resolution.
DLSS P is 50% so 1080p.
DLSS B is 59% so 1270p

>>729198773
DLSS Quality mode renders games internally at a resolution close to your target (e.g., ~3200x1800 for 4K)

>>729199365
No it doesn't, very few games have actual render resolution slider for DLSS. Those presets have the same resolution scaling no matter the output.
Maybe you thinking about NIS.

>>729199634
you are*

>>729199634
No most google results say 3200.

File: pcm.gif (2.58 MB, 498x426)

2.58 MB GIF

>>729166589
>>729166589
I'm using an 27" glossy OLED 1440p 280hz monitor, this shit is so cash, everyone that's saying that 1080p 60hz is fine is a coping third worlder.

>>729198327
diminishing returns. frames help with aiming up to a point. then the only thing realistically you can blame aside from skill issue are your mouse and mouse pad. not like you are a voltaic master so you don't know the first thing about aiming.
imo you shouldn't waste time with comp crap in 2025 + 1 because you'll have to deal with cheaters who don't get banned.

>>729200252
Where did i talk about aim you fucking brainlet pajeet?

>>729199809
You are either trolling or you should check again.
DLSS also has Ultra Quality preset with 75% scaling that one is above 1800p, but it's rare.

>>729200392
the fuck you need more than 144 hz for?

>>729200252
Higher hz still generally has better pixel response times. Most 144hz for example aren't "true 144hz" like those benq monitors that the biggest tryhards used. It's easy to see on the ufo test that just having lots of hz doesn't necessarily meanthat the pixels come in time, you turn on blur reduction and suddenly everythign changes.

>>729166589
With the whole ram thing going on i went all in a week ago on a new gpu.
And i'm playing cyberpunk 2077 with everything on high at 120 fps in 1440p
And i have to say, on my old gpu where i could only run the game with DLSS performance with most of RT turned off it was kind of shit.
But now with high fps it plays like a complete different game.
It''s fun.

I'm intentionally forcing devs to continue to cater to my lower specs and hamper progress. As a joke.

>>729201268
Yeah I felt that when my 970 was on its last years. Some games simply weren't enjoyable because I couldn't get smooth enough fps and would just go back to boomer shooters. But right now there hasn't been many big games I want to play. I had high hopes for Doom The Dark Ages after Eternal, but it didn't deliver and AAA feels like it's just muh graffix and immersion games.

File: 1741485501653622.jpg (332 KB, 1752x2550)

332 KB JPG

>>729166589
I have a gimped RTX 5070 (on a laptop). Can't run recent AAA slop above 1080p 60fps medium settings.

File: motion_blur_from_persiste(...).png (61 KB, 640x640)

61 KB PNG

>>729166589
Here's the truth of the matter:
Perceived motion "smoothness" hits severe diminishing returns above 120hz, but motion CLARITY can be noticeably improved upon to near 1000hz on sample-and-hold displays.

>>729199971
Have a (You). Cretin.

File: 1728929483821456.png (1.55 MB, 2613x849)

1.55 MB PNG

>>729166589
I just started using a 1440 120hz monitor. 1080p 60hz is better for some games like friday night funkin

>>729202349
>We discovered that hypothetically the ufo would look really blurry even though that's not at all how humans perceive motion
Blur busters is pseudointellectual bullshit and that's not even getting into the fact that ghosting can vary from panel to panel even if they're both the same refresh rate.

>>729202915
Holy shit, imagine shitting on one of the most long standing and reputable websites on display technology
You newfags are something else

>>729202915
It's not hypothetical. 120hz can still look blurry if you pay attention and making it not blurry is significant advantage when tracking objects with your cursor or otherwise trying to keep up with the image.

>>729203090
Reputiate my asshole you doughnut.

File: 1764215795816224.png (105 KB, 434x395)

105 KB PNG

>>729203167
Kek, well played

>>729166589
I can't afford a 240hz 32" 4k monitor.
So I settled for a 60hz 32" 4k monitor.

Bought a 500hz 1440p oled and I use it at 250 with bfi
I've done UFO tests at increasingly higher speeds and I don't notice any improvements between 250 and 500 so I suspect that only helps at absurdly insane speeds that are way past what I can even attach my gaze to objects at

>>729166589
I got a 1440p 240hz screen but its so underwhelming that I wouldn't even be bothered going back. Next monitor will probably be a 4k OLED and I won't care if its only 60hz.

File: 1755442579096475.jpg (307 KB, 1344x1728)

307 KB JPG

if any anon cares to read

laptop: 16" 4k 120hz microled
tv 65" 4k 120hz oled
monitor 34" 3440x1440 244hz oled

not much a difference between 120 and 240, when you're looking for it you'll notice it. the jump between 60 and 120 is much more drastic compared to the jump from 120 to 240. i also don't play fps games that much so when i got the monitor i was playing racing games to try to see the difference.

at the right distance, the monitor doesn't look bad compared to either of my 4k options

the cheapest upgrade would be to just go from lcd to oled, if you have the cash to upgrade your hardware or if your display is bottlenecking your experience get a higher resolution oled. refreshrate is kinda a meme above 120

pic unrelated

File: omni-man-invincible.gif (407 KB, 640x308)

407 KB GIF

CRTchad be like:

>>729206808
Crt filters on an oled mog you

File: 1766550763616.webm (671 KB, 576x400)

671 KB WEBM

>>729166589
human eye can't see over 165 fps

>>729168131
you missed his first point

File: 1707911349396961.png (235 KB, 626x500)

235 KB PNG

I've been drunk for the last 3 years and such activities are not conductive to performing any upgrades on my stuff or my life.

>>729166589
I have a 1080p 144hz monitor and am fine with it. I would upgrade to 1440p though if I could actually decide on a monitor but every one I look at has issues in the reviews so I get choice paralysis and stick with what I have.

>>729166589
I don’t. I have a 75 inch TV.

And it’s not 1996. Man you pc dudes are stuck in the fucking Stone Age eh?