[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Z3456.jpg (486 KB, 1080x1107)
486 KB
486 KB JPG
Why it's always bad?
>>
File: 1740889892587797.png (3 KB, 342x245)
3 KB
3 KB PNG
>>729182961
the New Vegas DLC was good. Don't care about Fo3 and Fo4, those games were very shallow and lame. New Vegas is the only worthwhile one of those.
>>
>>729182961
Fallout DLC is always bad because they're not treated as extensions of the base game. They are simply self contained theme parks(and often linear) that you fuck around in, then return to the base game with extremely OP gear.
Ironically, the best DLCs are the ones that add very little, like GRA or Automaton. All of the Fallout games have this issue in regards to their new location DLCs.

The base game is infinitely beter.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.