>they're actually the most fun rpg games i've played in a whilei've been neglecting them, cuz /v/ told me ubisoft was bad, but, this shit is actually fun as fuck. what the fuck /v/?
>>729187136another case of "its not a bad game its just a bad [...] game" they are decreasingly assassins creed in their manner
>>729187136shadows wasn't bad, definitely an improvement on the formula. the three you listed are all SLOP
>>729187136Everything after black flag was sloppy. The end of 3 showed you exactly where they were heading even with better naval combat.
>>729188040>>729188040trvke cept the latter part. origins and odyssey were good rpgs, valhalla was just a slog
>rpgs
>>729188150the naval combat fucking sucks and it isn't AC. im here to stealth kill, not whatever the fuck that slog is.
odyssey was the best, needed less water tho. or more to do on it besides fighting ships.also people who cry about the loot style in odyssey just shows how fucking dumb they are, not that they can defend themselves since the dice captcha probably has them perma filtered nowvalhallas world is 'better' but it's too much green open fields, or empty snoworigins suffers from being the first attempt mostlyit stumbled so odyssey could sprint>then valhalla fell on its face trying to be Breath of the Vikings too much
>>729188232meh. didn't care for origins at all but at least odyssey had a good story. gameplay-wise this entire trilogy was middling
