he was right, videogames aren’t art. you can’t “win” art. all the examples people hold up as games as art suck dick compared to games like call of duty that aren’t trying to be art. you are a retard if you think you are “playing art”.is chess art too according to you stupid faggots? no, your cheap shitty entertainment (which has gotten worse since ebert made his article) is not art and never will be. sad fucks
Gamer scum will never understand the transcendent art of movies like this.
>you can’t “win” artThat’s something only a loser would say
>>729189889Then stop crying about artistic integrity when a game gets censored.
>>729190114not an argument. bad movies existing doesn’t make good games art.is chess art? if not, why not? why is braid or whatever shitty indie game you hold up as art, art, but chess or go are not?
>>729189889>you can’t “win” art
>>729190364you cannot be this stupid
>>729190404I'm not the guy who made a statement that was easily obliterated
>>729190238This is that shitty boomer argument from Ebert. How can you be a millenial or zoomer and think comparison holds in any way?Do you think call of duty requires the same cognitive and motor skills as chess? Do you think a fully realised 3d scene enhanced with sounds is the same thing as a flat 2d checkboard?
