I've never played this series but I've heard these two are the best ones. I only have time to get into one of them, so which do you recommend?
bro, get fucking laid already
>>729200750If you're really time-crunched, V is the one that is closer to a game while IV is the foundation to an autism nation builder that's like a janker Paradox game. Both have different appeals.
>>729201097Is this actually true or just a meme answer?
>>729200750Play iv if you want to listen to the negro african main menu track every time you start up the game
>>729201227No he's right. Civ V and everything after play like board games.
I just want an interface that scales to modern resolutions. Only reason I don't play 4 more.
>>7292007505 is beloved because it was lots of peoples first game and the presentation is really good. Civ 4 has deeper more empire building mechanics and is overall a better game>>729201097>like a janker Paradox game. Pure ignorance. Paradox games aren't even that deep.
>>729200750civ 4 is a much better game plus it was the last civ game to have proper mod support and it shows
>>729200750Civ 5 is where the series starts to get dumbed diwn for the masses
>>729200750Both are good and the peaks of the seriesNo mods? Civ IVWilling to explore and use mods, especially QOL suff and to add features? Civ VThere you go
