[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: hair on vs off.jpg (317 KB, 1280x720)
317 KB
317 KB JPG
>Turning off the "Hair" practically doubles the FPS and in some cases looks outright better (when it gets wet in the rain)

This is just a cutscene example. It gets worse when you're actually in the thick of action.

Are there any other examples of poorly programmed/fucked up graphical settings?
>>
The majority of graphical settings are just meant to make FPS worse when they're cranked up so people buy GPUs
>>
>>729205140
>uses RTX for a budget card made for children and third worlders
>surprised that it can't do all of the bells and whistles made for high end cards
>>
File: 1483796405554.webm (263 KB, 702x600)
263 KB
263 KB WEBM
>>729205497
>Acts like a high end card will make a dogshit feature good
>>
>>729205140
Look, hair is extremely important to the female gooners out there who want to shlick it to Leon.
>>
>>729205140
The RTX hair just looks weird. It stands out, like he's wearing a bad wig.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.