>These graphics made zoomers piss and shit themselves
It looks just like real life!
Well?Did it live up to your expectations /V/?https://youtu.be/P99qJGrPNLs?si=0kwMnn_bKnEwflHz
>>729274702>Did it live up to your expectations
>>729274702 the initial gameplay reveal did not live up to my expectations, I did not want GTA cum Cyberpunk
>this made millennials rush to buy new computers
>>729274702>12 years ago
>>729274870>RTXNo
I liked Cyberpunk now after three years of patches but I still can't stand people saying it's the best looking game ever. It looks good only specifically at night in screenshots. Otherwise, daytime looks weird, and if you're driving around it has some of the closest pop-in ever. Not even just small little irrelevant objects, but sections of shadow and other lighting. You have to really tunnel vision on far off things like buildings to enjoy the view of the city.
>>729274870>Stone-age game has better texture than Cyperslop
>>729275010Freiza is prehistoric too
Graphics peaked here
We didn't need better than mid PS2 graphics
>>729274870Literally me. HL2 and WoW both came out and I bought them with my first GPU. THAT is one of the purest piss shit moments. First time getting a GPU and putting it in the shitty family computer.
>>729274702350 mods later, I almost feel like I'm playing the game that was advertised in that trailer
>>729275612zoom in
graphics peaked herehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-UhDuKZ2OQ
>>729275612>le downsampled screenshot with jpg compression artifacts to hide the specular aliasing and low quality assetslove this meme
>>729274961This and path tracing looks absolutely atrocious in motion, especially with ray reconstruction. It literally only ever looks good in screenshots after not moving at for 2s+ so the samples can accumulate.
yes graphics peaked with cyberpunk
>>729274702Hell no. Only weebfaggots like cyberpunk bcse of the anime they made.
