Anyone else think this is better than the original TR1?>cuts out the annoying side rooms and other worse areas>replaces hitscan enemies in tank controls (bad game design) with QTE segments>keeps the atmosphere>platforming quirks aren't bad once you get used to them>level replay and rewards ensure an addicting 100%>better Croft manor>more fuckable LaraThe only thing worse is introducing certain bosses with cutscenes instead of surprising you with them in gameplay. I have to say this and Legend have been great experiences for me.
Bump
I liked it but it's one of the jankiest games I ever played.
I've never played it, but I've always had the impression that it was a low-quality game. It's as if the original Tomb Raider 1 was a simulator, and this was just a simplified and completely wrong version of it.But as I said, I've never played this game.
>>729296035I thought so too at first. A lot of the jumps were frustrating. But you just have to get used to the quirks. You have to wait for the camera to zoom out for some jumps and for others you have to be quicker on the jump. I'll take these minor quirks and much smoother movement over precise ledge grabs and tank controls. Ideally this is how Lara should control.
>>729295997I'm not a fan of either but Anniversary is much worse. It's literally just a boring prince of persia shimmying simulator.
>>729296389I'll say it a hundred times if neededTank controls were a creative limitation.The reason they kept those controls for many entries is because they kept popping these up with the same engine.
>>729295997Yes. I think anniversary is the best tomb raider game.
>>729296890Lol, no.Tank controls are nothing more than the gameplay version of a common concept in any 3D environment, related to local vs. world coordinates. Just as in 3D software, there are times when you need to move objects with global coordinates, and others with local coordinates, the same is necessary in video games. It's not a limitation, it's a necessity in many games (the best example being top-down racing games with static camera).The gameplay of Tomb Raider 1 was entirely based on the idea that movements are all relative to Lara's position and not to the camera/world/etc. Note: TR1 would benefit greatly, however, if there were a button that, when held, would change the reference coordinates from Lara to the camera, as in Mario 64. This would greatly facilitate some movements without detracting from the gameplay (as the modern controls in TR Remaster do).
>>729295997it's lovely, this and underworld are my favorites in the series
>>729295997both games are high kino
>>729295997Not op but are the tomb raiders 1-3 remastered worth playing over the originals?
>>729295997Yes but TR underworld better
>>729295997It's a good game but a bad remake
>>729301141Yes
>>729295997its way easier
>>729296438So... like the original
>>729295997No. Platforming is worse, writing is worse, ambience is worse, and relied too much in combat on those slow-mo dodges>keeps the atmosphere
>>729301141The remastered versions make the originals obsolete. You can switch between original and remastered graphics on the fly. The remastered collections are plug and play experiences whereas you would have to tinker with the original releases to get them to play nicely. Just remember to install the uncapped FPS mod for the 1-3 remaster if you're going to play with OG graphics (devs refused to let og graphics run at more than 30fps because they wanted le retro aesthetic even tho it runs perfect no amtter how high ur fps is)And have fun, they are MAGICAL games I promise
>>729295997>Anyone else think this is better than the original TR1?Nope
>>729295997Original act 2 drags on for too long. I think it has like 5 levels in total or something.In all, Tomb Raider is lovely. I played it and loved it long before I was interested in booba. I like Lara as a character regardless whether she is sexy or a woman.
>>729302430>>729301606would you guys recommend the 4-6 remastered and Nu Lara trilogy?
>>729303171>Nu Lara trilogy?Rise is okay, at best. The other two are ass.
>>729295997it's a terrible streamlined remake. The environment feel like setpieces and are over designed (wtf are all those hanging bars lmao)
>>729303171You should play all 6 of the original games. They are all great.The LAU trilogy (Legend, Anniversary, Underworld) are divisive. Personally I don't like them at all but there are people who do. They are like easier more American hollywood versions of the originals. Nu-Lara trilogy is pure garbage
>>729295997fuck your shit remake
>>729295997Not that bad as people claim at all, I think it's the best entry point to get into TR series.
>>729295997It's a good game but the original is unsurpassed. We're talking about one of the best games in history, legit top 10 material.
>>729295997>Anyone else think this is better than the original TR1?Only if you work at Crystal Dynamics
>>729295997It's significantly better than the original. Only retarded nostalgia cucks think otherwise.Gameplay could be better but the atmosphere and levels are unmatched
>>729308584- zoomer who hasn't beaten level 2 of the OG
>>729308584>the atmosphere and levels are unmatchedyou never played the original, there is zero atmosphere in the remake
>>729308238Off topic, but there is not one inch of Lara Croft's body I wouldn't lick.
>>7293031714 is great. 5 is meh but you may like it. AoD is a meme game but you might like it?>NuLaraRise was good, and the first one was a decent adventure game. The problem with these games are that they are too different
>>729306213I love anniversary manor
>>729310128The best parts of legends and anniversary were the manor and the secret puzzles to get the hidden relics. Underworld removed this and instead it threw like 1,000 orbs randomly
>>729303171Only the first game of the nuLara trilogy is worth playing, its like a solid 7/10. The rest are not worth playing.
>>729310227Still disappointed that legend manor didn't have an exterior. Would've been great to have a bike area like the quad in 3. But the legend manor has the superior music
>>729295997TR1 Anniversary is best game of the seriesAnd possibly the best remake ever made of a video game
>>729309894Same, imagine giving her a tongue bath after she's done some workout
>>729303171It's hard to recommend 4-6. Peculiar games. 6 is considered the worst in the series. 4 is a bloated mess and has the same boring aesthetic throughout. 5 was notoriously hated by the devs themselves, they hated making it. I liked it well enough, it's short and simple.
>>729296130I love TR1 with TR3 sort of close second, when I saw Anniversary there was something about it that didn't appeal to me at all and I forgot it exists.I think it was because it was just re-treading same thing and wouldn't show me anything new. There wasn't any new gimmick or graphics improved enough for me to care. Very bland.
>>729310408>t. buys every release of cod and asscreed day 1
>>729311151I never bought a single game in my life you silly faggot, its all stolen
