[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


i sure am glad i finished this for free on psplus and didn't actually buy it for what they are charging. it feels like a cheap mobile knockoff of rdr2. not sure why people are calling this a spaghetti western, the story is extremely bland, missions are scripted, animations and combat are clunky, literally feels like a gta3 era game with horses. hunting, one of the best parts of rdr2, is hilariously bad too.
>>
>>729301081
You have to understand that when it came out it was pretty revolutionary, I didn't play it back then because I didn't own a console, played it now and it is pretty barebones and boring, RDR2 is better in every way
>>
What causes someone to judge an old game as if it was made the same year they played it for the first time?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.