>animal protagyay or nay?
I don't care one way or the other
nothing wrong with it specially if the game is actually good
>>729368096Yay. It's preferable, actually.
Whatever, as long as its not an obvious outlet for the dev's fetish shit.
>>729368096No, human protag
I remember buying this game as a destressorIt was bad
>>729368096if they're designed to be fuckable noif they're designed to be cute and the fuckability is coincidental maybeif they're designed to be cute and i don't even see how or why a furry would get off to it then yes
>>729369146interesting answer
>>729369513i dont want to be reading into every animation/pose/line of dialogue second guessing if the dev was yiffing to it or not
i like when there's explanation why it's animal or humanoid animal
Extremely yes.
If it's not>Fetish shit>Typical neon furry shit>Oversexualized shitThen I don't mind
yes
>>729368096threesome with these two
>>729368096Human male protag with female furry love interest
>>729371767This.This is the ideal.
>>729371823post it
>>729368096>Rainworldyay>Barbie Horse Adventurenay
>>729371823Kill yourself pedo
i love tagging animals with guns and bullets
>>729368096Depends entirely on the game and its genre/premise. Ideally it actually contributes something to the experience and/or is an intrinsic aspect of the game (like the example you posted) rather than just an arbitrary aesthetic element.
>>729368096Only if female
>>729368096Yes, it can be done successfully.If you're afraid it'll alienate normies also make human characters inhabiting the game's world.
>>729371767BASED. And you have human females with male anthros too to make it fair.
>>729368096Yes.
>>729373187man that's wild
>AI-slop postingouch
>>729369997you seem weirdly fixated on it it you really have to read into every single line of dialogue to find out
>>729368096It's better than black/gay/female protag so yay
>>729371471>>729376296<= Me
>>729378048i'm old enough to have seen just how sneaky furfags can be when they try to pass off as normali want no part in their nonsense and i will keep my guard up to exactly that end
any games you're looking forward to?
>>729378564Just one.
>>729377834That game fucking sucked.
>>729378331that's a really weird thing to be paranoid aboutit's just fiction, man, and furries is not the kind of a fandom to specifically sneak fetishbait into a normal game. what you see is exactly what you will get 95% of the time.games which don't makes it their main goal to appeal to a specific audience but still feature prominently western furry characters are quite rare and are a relatively recent phenomena in general (see: project silverfish, casualties unknown, etc). older games either use anthros as a way to appeal to children, or were specifically made by furries for furries with no one else in mind.
>>729378564https://store.steampowered.com/app/1358120I am keeping an eye on it you could say
>>729378969it had good feel at least
>>729379162t. secret furry who wants to subvert you
Yay, but could she be hot for once?
>>729368096I don't like that a bunch of old fat furry faggots made a bunch of media that was loosely connected to their disgusting animal fetish, and for that I say no.
>>729379430Sure if you have the mental maturity of a small child. If you're gonna sell me fucking muh darkness kingdom farts about muh friendship then you sure as fuck better at least have charm. They didn't even do the proper "wakakawakaka" voice thing that you're supposed to do if you don't have actual voice acting. It's just plain fucking text. What a piece of shit.
>>729379581
>>729379162>haha you're weird, that's weirdNo that's normal. And you should be weary of "the chef who puts varying amounts of cum in all of your food"
>>729379639
>>729375681>If you're afraid it'll alienate normies also make human characters inhabiting the game's world.this wasn't a problem with crash bandicoot or spyro
>>729379581>>729379639>>729379714
>>729379739It should have been considering the artists were also secret furries
>>729379162>95% of the time.So one-in-twenty are worth being afraid of? Those aren't good numbers, Anon.
>>729379817but it wasnt which defeats the alienation argument
>>729379251>cow girl spottedMight have to keep an eye out too
>>729379162Okay puppy killer
>>729379680>food analogyi am sorry i can't take this response seriously. it's so far fetched and absurd it's actually quite funny.>>729379821do you play more than 20 unique games with anthros per year? do you also realize that the distribution is skewered and that the more popular games you're more likely to come across are more likely to be normal by your standards?
>>729379639>>729379714>>729379780Why has no one made a game like this?
>>729380378Nobody will buy it
>>729380317You're a furry who wants to sneak his fetishes into media. This isn't up for discussion, I'm not accusing you of anything, it's simple fact. In classic dysgenic freak fashion you run to play the plausible deniability but it's so transparent that you would call someone weird for not wanting to play a fucking bara vore game because "its not like that bro"
>>729380412whyi would
>>729379626instead of standard gibbering they used sounds, fluffly lizard girl sounds like a wooden instrument, it's subtle.
>>729368096Nay.
>>729380317food (something you like) being (poisoned) ejaculated into by a degenerate pervert (furfag) should be incredibly easy to understandfood adulteration is an apt analog for subversive game/media development
>>729380515That had to be in an update because I swear on my grandmother's grave it did not have any such thing. No sounds of any kind, just plain text.
>>729380412
>>729379626>Sure if you have the mental maturity of a small childThat's like, majority of people here
>>729380415well, i wanted to engage with you in good faith, but this post made me realize there won't be anything to gain in a dialogue with somebody like youi can only suggest you to talk to more people. to not seek out strawmans to point your finger at, but to actually engage with different groups of interests outside of your own.
>>729380675>Muh likes and views on trailerThanks for proving nothing.
Only if the talking animals are badass and cool and coexist with fantasy monsters, humans, and human-derived creatures. Oh, and the protagonist must be a reptile.
>>729380687I hate whimsical shit that feels like it is clearly marketed for a younger audience. My wife asked me to watch the remake of digimon 2020 with her after she recently played the new strangers digimon game and both the anime and the game fucking sucked. Who writes this shit? What's worse is she got so excited and kept naming every digimon they saw as if it were proper nomenclature. What inspires someone to care about such useless fucking information?
>>729380690Oh no, what a shame, and here I was having a good faith discussion with a furry who wants fat tigers jacking off in the next spyro game
>>729380461Why do you think there never was a 'normal', BIG furry game?(and I do mean furry, so shit like self-insert wolves etc with pink hair, shit like that) Despite the fact that furry fandom is older than most people here?
>>729380564it seems inconsistent, but chaska's sound stood out to me, and i played the game in november
>>729381037No big studio wanted to take a risk, but now that Zoopunk is coming out we see that there is interest.
>>729381037>furry is what I say it islol?there are plenty of furry games
>>729381037>>729381160Also, people had big interest in Biomutant but it didn't turn out a very good game.
>>729380905it looks whimsical indeed, there's death, suffering sacrifice and the like as well. it's not going to win any awards for writing though
>>729380540Unironically hot.
>>729380675Looks like slop ngl
>>729380690>well, i wanted to engage with you in good faith,No, you didn't. It's pointless to lie.
>>729381221>>furry is what I say it isThat's correct. But go ahead, keep dodging the question.
>>729381037Ratchet & Clank
>>729380415but it's seriously not like that this is a metroidvania and you would accuse it of degeneracy because it only has furries
>>729381356Uhm sorry thats not big or furry according to my unclear definitions. Good try doe
>>729381356No furry, buddy. Try harder
>>729381392>have this fetish>hate the artstyleA swing and a miss if I ever saw one.
>>729380543this is such an insane overgeneralization that it has no actual basis in reality. what if EVERY single chef you order from can secretly be a pervert? what if someone down the production chain of a steak handled the meat without gloves? what if the oceanic salt wasn't cleared properly due to a malfunction?dish in a restaurant is an effort of thousands of loosely connected people, from truck drivers who might forget to turn the refrigerator trailers in time to the factory local to the pasture where the cows grew up that's paid off the authorities to dump pollutants into the nearby lake.games, meanwhile, are:not consumed, therefore do not have to be made in a way that's appealing for others. a gamedev can make a game for himself that has also coincidentally found an audience, chef always cooks for someone else in a context of a restaurant.isolated artifacts, where the quality of the end product does not depend on a million of other minor factors as the developer has complete control over it's components, unlike a chef who can only choose to trust a specific suppliers with no actual guarantees.has no pretense or expectations, as there are food combinations and tastes which are found to be universally repulsing (like untreated, rotten meat), while games do not have such limitations and can exist in any form or way in which the developer seems fit.and then there's also a direct impact of consuming the "corrupted" piece: badly prepared food can be specifically made with intention to hurt you in a physical way, while fiction (any kind of fiction, mind you) has no real ability to impact you unless you specifically choose to adopt the concepts presented by the piece. you will not die of a brain-eating amoeba if you will suddenly find yourself playing a fetish game, therefore these two things are fundamentally not comparable by the impact, and should not be presented as analogous.
>>729381557inflation, vore, and everything in-between must be a curse to have
>>729382752I think its absolutely a curse if you're one of the asexual gooner types who have effectively become a vested rat by their constant reinforcement. If you're at the point where you can't cum during physical sex without thinking of vore or such then you are mega fucked. By the way, the vested rat phenomenon is when a rat is given a Velcro vest during infancy and wears it until sexual maturity to the point where removing the vest makes the rat become completely impotent. Humans are not so different.
>>729380540Krystal is more correct, but both pale in comparison to the Bunny.
>>729382946thanks for reminding me of the fetish where people wear velcro suits and stick themselves to walls and floors
>>729383891LULZ
>>729368096Best mascots are their own beings simply inspired by an animal. Think of Sonic characters, how many even look like their animal counterpart? Tails come the closest but if you remove his ears and tails then suddenly it become much harder. Mascot characters by design are literally made to sell. Bonus points if it isn't even inspired by an animal. Midna is basically the perfect example of furrybait but by calling it a furry in the first place will bring waves of arguments.
>>729368096I like anthro and animal protagonists but only male.I don't give a fuck about all that "Big titty anthro babe" shit.
