>he doesn't game at 5Klmao'ing at all the poors
>fake frames>fake resolution>fake monitor>fake games>fake post>fake ophow much is this jewish scam aka the monitor?
>>729401861I game at 16K with 16 times the detail
5k2k doesn't have high enough refresh rate right now so i'll stick to 4k 240hz.
>>729402002This
lol he lives most his life in a fucking box
"Detail without intent is just noise" - Sun Tzu
>>729402768wow so you're a crocodile because you don't have a 5k monitor
>>729402768this quote really does describe how shit modern devs are at creating pleasing looking games. its all just washed out noise with no clear contrast
Fyi the 5k is a dual mode so you can play it in 1440p which makes it a god tier monitor
>>729403535>no contrastStop playing on a tn monitor or washed out ips >>7294020024k on my 42" gives me the realestate of 4 22" monitors in one for productivity
>>7294018611440p ultra settings 60+fps master race reporting
>>729401861You ain't gaming at 8k yet, brokie?
>>729403728>xhe doesn't play old classics at 8k
>>729403708You can play at 1080p, 1440p on a 4k display
>>729403694>Stop playing on a tn monitor or washed out ipsnigger go to any modern game and take a screenshot. then edit it to be black and white and you'll see theres a lack of fucking contrast in the visuals. but oh no take the apple faggot mentality and blame the user rather than the company making it
>>729403970No point of that I'd rather play new games at 8k
Does anyone use dual monitors without neck pain?
>>729401861>AI upscalingwhere do TV manufacturers get the RAM for that?
>>729404048>new gamesewwwwww
>>729404025Im playing arc as we speak now try againInb4 he paste screenshots from a streamer with bumped up gamma so they can see enemies in the extremely dark parts of interiors
>>729404083Yes? You're not supposed to stare at the second one for long. You keep shit there that you occasionally look at.
>>729404304games were meant to be played at gamma 1.8.
>>729404821You know you can swivel your chair right?You know you can move your eyes right?You know you can invest in a desk that isnt 60cm shallow?
>>729404972>games were meant to be played with no shadows or dark partsYou know that 1.8 gamma is brighter than 2.2?
>>729405042I am indeed aware.
>>729403647>Fyi the 5k is a dual mode so you can play it in 1440p which makes it a god tier monitorWhen I first heard about 5K I thought it was fucking retarded, until I learned about this. Being able to have 5k for desktop and 1440p for gaming would probably be really nice, assuming that the price isn't outrageous.
I'm fucking doing it I'm buying a 4k OLED and you can't stop me!!!!!
>>729405172You wrre just saying games are washed out and now you say you should lower gamma to 1.8 to make it worse? Oh wait youre one of those faggots using a tn playing only 90s games. Or an apple user their default is 2.0.
>>729404018That's what I was thinking on doing but apparently 1440p looks a lot worse on a 4k display compared to native (assuming same monitor size of course)And since it's impossible to guarantee high framerate experience in all titles at 4k even with a top rig, I'd say settling for 1440p is much safer (especially since you can use DLDSR)
>>729403647Only if said monitor is 27'. PPI wise you don't want 1440p on a 32' or bigger monitor.
>>729405804A PPI of 96 is all you need. Higher is pure memery.
>>729405731Im using a 4k c5 42 next to my pg279q which is a 27 1440p monitor and at 1440p they look the same in games. I sit 90cm from the c5.
>>729405804Are you stupid or something a 5k monitor doesnt lose ppi if you lower the resolution.>>729404972The industry standard for calibration has been 2.2 for like 25 years now and movies are usually made with 2.4 in mind.
>>729406061The industry standard for monitors is piecewise.
>>729405968Huh sorry but I have a hard time believing you, screen size is just extra important in relation to actual resolution. That's also why I enjoy handheld consoles, the games look real good on those small screens despite the low res while consoles are just awful on big screens.But anyway I personally wouldn't go above 27' for a 5k which probably will never happen. For me 24' was already perfect for fps games and 27' is nearly too big for me.
>>729406061Technically no the number of pixels stays the same but not for the image, it'll be a lot less sharp. The latest tandem OLED from Asus has a 720p mode with 700+Hz and it looks absolutely DREADFUL on a 27', like puke inducing despite the monitor being 1440p. 720p looks fine on a switch screen though.
2560 / 45 degrees is already near the limits of pixels per degree that you can even noticeI would maybe consider 3k or 4k if I also got a much bigger one for when I play a game with even higher viewing angle. but ultrawide is a meme. my eyes don't see in ultrawide
whats the fucking point of 5k monitors or TVs?? totally useless shit.Now i DO want a good 8k 65in TV on the other hand. I hate seeing the damn pixels when a bit close to the TV on a 4k 55/65 inch.Even at 4k the graphics/details look like garbage on a bigass tv
I bought a laser projector because I wanted a big screen but didn't want to bother with a big heavy TV. So I just pull it out when I need it and point it at my wall or ceiling.Shit can handle 4k/60fps normally and 4k/120fps or 8k/60fps if overclocked.
>>729407331>whats the fucking point of 5k monitors or TVs?? totally useless shit.Dual mode 5K monitors would give you ultra sharp desktop mode and then be sharp 1440p monitor with high refresh rate for gaming.
>AI
Resolution is a retarded metric to focus on and it gets prohibitively more computationally expensive the higher you goWhat really matters is getting a display that gets 60 ppd from your typical viewing distance
>>729401861I don't even know a single fucking game that supports 5k resolution.
>>729407474THeres absolutely NO way in hell some """"""4k"""" projector looks as good as a decent true 4k tv. Bet that """"4k""" projection looks as good as some 1080p signal on the highest quality projection. Or else TVs and tv manufacturers would be out of fcking business more than a decade ago.tl;dr : you're coping HARD micropenis-anon.
>>729401861Turn DLSS off and tell us how that went
>>729401861What the hell is 5K2K
>>729406181Youre a retard and cant even cite any of your sources for 1.8 gamma.>>729406219Ok youre a retard ill ignore you.
>>729407795The touryst and silksong
>>729401861why did they attach the ai buzzword to a fucking screen
>>729407795HL2
>>72940779590% of games made in the last 15 years. Assuming a game can support the aspect ratio resolution is arbitrary. Hell with the likes of dgvoodoo2 you can override any limits a game may impose in the menu and output whatever the fuck.
>>729408197the textures already look garbage at 4k
>>729404196wow low polygon count... le soul or something
>>729407874Short for (approx.) 5000 px by 2000 px. So barely more than UHD (3860 x 2160), just a bit wider.
Monitor threads are always brainlets with no first hand experience saying this and that sucks and i dont believe you so you are wrong! And most likely stsre at commandlines in linux all day and only play 200 year old japanese games at gamma 1.8 and 9000 kelvin at 80 nits
>5K2Ktell me when it's 4K3K, the final evolution of display
What the FUCK is 5K2K, I swear all marketing departments should be sent to the gas chambers
>>729407796The limitations of projectors is environment and the setup needed for it, that's why. I don't know what projector that anon has but LCoS projectors from Sony and JVC look amazing. The newer UST Laser projectors are pretty good too.
you dont need more than a 2k IPS 27" monitor. I've been using the same ultra gear monitor for 6 years now. I even fell for the OLED meme and returned it once I realized how overhyped that tech is.
>>729408632No you didnt.
>>729408045>>729408197>>729408210Is it native 5k or some bullshit to stretch to 5k?
>>729407796Well it's almost twice as expensive as an average 4k TV these days. I just got it on sale. Also you need a big empty space on a white wall to use it and a lot of people don't have that.It's kind of a niche product.
>>729408849Yes, I did. IT was the MPG MSI QD-OLED.I didn't like it, The text was blurry, it kept nagging me to do screen refreshes every 4 hours which took 10 minutes, the VRR flicker was abysmal. The blacks were nice and the colors were vibrant but there were many trade offs.My 6 year old IPS panel is ran 24/7, still works, the coating is bombproof, its pretty enough just bleeds in dark environments. So what.
>>729408483Give me DCI 4k, none of this 3840 shit.
>>729408473Hey fuck you 6300k is perfectly fine.
1080p is enough for anyone you ingrates, anything higher is a gimmick
>>7294078745120x2160
>>729402768me on the left
>>729409213on a 24" inch monitor, it's fine. 27" and bigger its awful.
>>729407874It's just ultrawide 4k
when will OLED drop to $200? its getting closer, not paying anymore than $200 for an OLED display. Feel sorry for the suckers who paid $1000+
I like my 1440p 27" IPS overallbut I think I am getting eye strain from being too closeideally it would be a bit bigger and on a long arm so I can sit up to play some games and recline way back for other games but have the same viewing angle
>>729409501> 24"moshi moshi, 2006 desu ne
>>729407795ut2004
>>729401861what’s the point of graphics if the game isn’t fun
>>729409991The game is fun
>>729401861>AI upscaling>AI upscaling>AI upscalingYou will buy fake pixels and you will be happy.
>>729409684You don't have one loser
>>729410090no, i just stare at them through best buy and wait for my chance im a broke nigga with an rx580
I think on a 32" screen something around "6k" resolution would be the pinnacle for getting a sharp image without being as ludicrously taxing to run as 8k. 8k will never really matter for monitors and even in the TV space only shine on true jumbotron screens that most people would simply never have the space for.
>>729406061how does lowering resolution on the same screen size not lose ppi? is half the screen blank?
>>729410650To be technical on LCD and oled screens then umber of pixels is fixed so lowering resolution technically doesn't lower PPI.
>>729410756so is the image stretched or not
>>729411075It could be but in the context of dual mode no as fundamentally you just get more pixels displaying the same colour to reflect the lower resolution. As in, lets say at 4k a wall would cover 8 pixels (2x4), using dual mode and running the screen at 1080p it now covers a 4x8 pixel grid. Aspect ratio remains the same.
