>raytracing is a meme tec-
>>729463139I just got an rtx card and tried quake 2 rtx, seemed like a meme to me
top looks better. proper shading that makes it look more realistic.bottoms looks like procedurally generated rubber garbage with no shading.
>>729463139All those cycles when ya coulda just baked that bitch
>>729463139textures: OFFplastic: ON
>>729463139>fps : 1000>fps : 5
>>729463139top looks better
>>729463139RTX ON are just brighter lights
>>729463139>he won't make another bait threa-
>its a year old reddit thread Fuck this website, man.
>>729463139Bottom takes out a lot of the contrast. Usually the best path when making art is to up the contrast to make it pop out.
>>729463139It sure is, what's your point, Anon?
>>7294634533/4 of the threads are
Look at the light near the door.On top it's appropriately highlighted.On the bottom it's like it's not even turned on and the light comes from a random place. This is one of the worst examples I've seen.
the bloody benchod nvidia users wasted their rupees on a meme techAMD much better value
>>729463525Not my MOH frontline thread
>that will be 3k dollars plus tax
>>729463139>was excited for RTX so we could have true reflections>everyone just uses it on Global Illumination which raster already did fineFucking bullshit.
>>729463453doesn't matter because you have retards itt that are still replying to the shitpost like it's real. might as well make the whole thing AI
If you're stopping long enough to actually notice light reflecting off objects in ways that ray tracing is capable of, you're not really playing the game you're just pixel peeping.Is ray tracing better? It can be in some situations but like with DLSS and Frame Generation these things have their downsides too.
>>729463214whens the last time you went outside
>>729463847so? people spend more just to repaint their house
>>729464359>no argument to why top doesn't look better so he has to result to mockeryKek. Nonetheless, I accept your concession.
>>729464493>didn't answer the questionit has been a while, huh
>>729463139RTX only makes sense for dynamic environments which old games often don't have.
>>729464493just out here with the bros, fishing for yous
>>729463139RTX shit will NEVER in its life beat manually done lighting and shading. They may as well just give up, but we know they won't. They'll just attempt to push this garbage more and more even to the detriment of players and even the original style of the game itself where everything without RTX is made to look as garbage as possible in it to incentivize actually using RTX for "better visuals" that they willingly castrated to begin with to try and get players to use that garbage.
>>729464598RTX was never a requirement EVEN for dynamic nor open-world games. We got near-perfect, 100% raster based lighting solutions by the time DirectX11 rolled out in 2009. It's once again EPIC and their RTX-shilling propaganda, trying to make dynamic / open maps seem like some mission-impossible job for real time lights and shadows this day and age. All because their shitty poster-boy Unreal Engine 5 sucks at just about everything.
>>729463139wtf I love memes now
>>729463139Top looks better.Sorry you hate shadows being dark so much.
>make the brick wall which actually made it seem like it had some depth into a plastic planeA meme indeed
>>729465794top looks better
