[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: diablo2r.jpg (329 KB, 1920x1080)
329 KB
329 KB JPG
Is this good to play as your first Diablo game?
>>
yes. ignore the larping fags pretending like diablo 1 is worth playing. D1 is not unlike any ARPG and is outdated as hell, unless you deliberately want a slow dungeon crawler. D2:R is great and basically the best remaster product on the market and is basically 1:1 unless you have hyper tranny autism.
>>
only if you never plan to play 1, because it's very rough to go back to if you've played any of the newer titles
>>
>>729521858
play d1 it's good and short
>>
>>729521858
Yes but it kinda fucks up the powerscaling in later games. Like in diablo 4 they hype how much of a big deal the big 3 prime evils were and you mostly fight lesser demons and so on, but if you played d2 before, the danger is kinda lost because the prime evils went down like chumps in d2 to your character.
These games should have ended with 2.
>>
>>729521969
>D1 is not LIKE any ARPG*
woops
>>
>>729521858
Id say 3 is more streamlined despite having more systems
2 is simple conceptually but it has far less handholding with builds and runes and items
It’s a more rewarding game as a result, but keep that in mind
I’ll also say that going from 3 to 2 makes you appreciate 2 even more (better gameplay, better aesthetics, etc), whereas 2 to 3 is a little jarring for people because of how different 3 is
4 is a good middle ground and is the newest entry so it’s getting all the updates
2 goes on sale for dirt cheap though and you can get TONS of hours out of it once it clicks
>>
>>729521858
yep, it's all about gameplay, story is just flavor, you really don't need to know.
>>
It's the only one worth playing in the series.
>>
project diablo2 is better
>>
>>729522318
D2 looked like shit back in year 2000
>>
>>729522105
yeah never understood why anyone gave much of a shit about le lore and story in games like this. they are patently shallow un purpose and just has you killing generic demons. its awesome. its just like doom and quake where the story and lore is completely non-existent and youre just there to kill shit and have a good time. D2 does have a decent enough story to keep you going though and you can easily follow it, as well as the very pretty cutscenes being a nice reward in and of themselves at the end of each chapter.
>>
>>729522318
Yeah it's hard to go back to D2R despite the graphics.
>>
>>729522460
Nta but diablo lore is actually pretty cool in that in a sea of tolkien fantasy shit it's one of the games where it's actually about angels vs demons and shit. I am honestly glad that in 20 years of diablo existing, I have not seen a single fucking dragon in these games.
>>
>>729522406
>I play diablo for the grafix
>>
>>729521858
it probably depends on what kinds of games you like.
>>
Chronicon is a fun little diablo clone.
>>
>>729521858
first and only, yes
>>
>>729522601
i mean, its just kinda whatever. its cool in a heavy metal cover kinda way but not much deeper than that. its just a divine comedy and paradise lost fusion like we've seen a billion times. again, let me make it clear that i dont think its not bad nor am i offended, but i cant understand why anyone would care too deeply beyond a "im 12 and this is awesome" kind of way, which is fine. also, i am going back now to watch comparisons between the OG cutscenes and Resurrected's cutscenes and damn! these cutscenes look really good and they did a great job with them. much better than what the random indonesian company that worked on WC3 Reforged did.
https://youtu.be/P_cKbNNhYkA?si=DTk8WLYL3v_RBOZf&t=12
>>
>>729521858
Problem is D2R visual designs are trannycoded. Just download LoD and play PD2z
>>
>>729521858
Unpopular opinion: I hate Diablo II. I played the original Diablo on release, bought Diablo II on release, and I just didn't like it. Never understood the hype. The early game is just god awful, takes forever to scale up to anything decent. The story is alright, but the atmosphere of the first game was better. The gameplay of both III and IV are better, so if that's what you are after I would just jump to IV (I like III, but realistically it is dead, especially since IV is finally getting on track).
>>
>>729524952
Yeah, Vicarious Visions is(was) fucking goated and they clearly loved Diablo 2, or at the very least understood you needed to respect the original developer intentions. A shame they got absorbed into the mass that is Blizzard fully and kind of just don't do anything specific anymore.
>>
>>729522601
>I have not seen a single fucking dragon in these games.
The first evil was a seven headed dragon that was made of the evil contained within Anu that he removed from himself. The seven heads went on to become the seven evils (four lesser, three greater). To my knowledge that is the only dragon mentioned in the lore.
>>
File: 1757218313700829.jpg (376 KB, 933x853)
376 KB
376 KB JPG
>>729521858
>is the 2nd best diablo game a good place to start
>>
>>729525147
D1 had better atmosphere no doubt about it. D2 is about impactful itemization and interesting character builds.
D3 was about picking a load-out and pressing buttons to see the floating WoW numbers go up, never played D4.
>>
>>729525190
yeah what happened to those guys? i saw they got acquired by blizzard and has been silent since D2. are they just another cog in the blizzslop machine now?
>>
>>729522601
>it's actually about angels vs demons
Diablo lore is specifically not about Angels vs. Demons. It's about Demons (and a couple of times angels) versus humanity, who are angeldemons.
>>
>>729526876
That's D3 fan fiction.
>>
>>729527223
I'm pretty sure d2 booklet talked about lilith and inarius creating sanctuary and its inhabitants
>>
>>729526620
>are they just another cog in the blizzslop machine now?
Basically yeah
>>
>>729527223
Nah. That's your headcanon, faggot.

>>729527550
Even Diablo 1 had Inarius in the lore.
>>
>>729521858
ideally it's your first one. it's the only one you will ever want to replay regularly.
>>
Did D2R ever fix the NHAM bug? Learning about that thing sapped nearly all enjoyment out of the game for me.
>>
>>729529130
Because you exclusively played zeal and fury?
>>
>>729522318
/thread. great mod and actively developed too. art direction suffered with the remaster plus you're giving microshit-actiblizz money which is a never ever
>>
>>729522318
just trying it out right now. D2R doesn't even compare



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.