[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: images (12).jpg (61 KB, 554x554)
61 KB
61 KB JPG
If you all hate AI, wouldn't you inherently hate procedurally generated games and rouge-likes as well?
>>
No because I grew up with that form of rudimentary machine-produced content so it doesn't count.
>>
jeets aren't sending their best
>>
>>729548887
>>729548887
Why do people hate AI art? They say it steals from artists but that's not true
It just 'looks' at a bunch of art from real people AND past AI images, and bases new compositions on that.
That's no more stealing than a person being inspired by someone else's work and using it to create their own art and style. Is the entire genre of anime is stealing because arr rooks same?

I for one think AI could revolutionize rogue-like games specifically, procedurally generated content is very limited but with a good AI behind it the potential for variety and originality is much greater
>>
File: 1766695106758218m.jpg (44 KB, 1024x767)
44 KB
44 KB JPG
>>729548887
>wouldn't you inherently hate procedurally generated games

I always did though.
>>
>>729548887
games like that aren't procedurally generated. They have a selection of like 20 rooms and then they use dice rolls to determine which ones you go through, what enemies you fight and what loot you get. All the assets are still hand made, just randomized.
>>
>>729550318
No the thing is that AI companies aggresively scraped the whole internet including copyrighted content, and got away with it. If it was me or you then we would have faced consequences.
>>
>>729548887
The main reason I dislike Persona 3 and 4 are the procedurally generated dungeons. They're total dog shit compared to hand crafted dungeons.
>>
>>729548887
I do. I hate procedurally generated games more than you can even begin to fathom. They are the most lazy, soulless shit. The only people who like them are people who lack pattern recognition and so cannot recognize how absolutely shallow and samey procedurally generated trash is, and they actually think a rock moving 2 feet to the left is a "Totally new and unique experience, brah!"
>>
>>729550490
How? Your looking at copyrighted content everyday and memorizing it, it's the same.
Do artists only study copyright free stuff or what they personally bought in order to train? Of course not
>>
>>729548887
Procedural generation is about generating tons of stuff very efficiently using as little data as possible, through very controlled algorith. It's the exact opposite of generative AI, which is about brute forcing gigantic data sets with as much computing power as possible with very generic and hard to even vaguely control algorithms.
>>
>>729550408
That's fair
>>
>>729548887
open world games are roguelikes are really bad games. i like hades and binding of isaac just cause their gameplay is really fun. i also don't care if ai art is used as long as its not total fucking dogshit. but i still don't play games that use mostly ai art because they're slop.
>>
>>729550576
>memorizing it, it'
No we aren't. Not to the pixel. Human memory is vague.
>>
He doesn't look a thing like Jesus
>>
>>729552442
It's the cuck's pushback agains the Latin Aryan Jesus
>>
>>729552564
But he speaks like a gentlemen
>>
>>729548887
no because i'm not ignorant enough to think these are even vaguely similar techniques
>>
>>729549002
i'm afraid that they are
>>
>>729552564
>jesus was a pale blonde gigachat
>t. pilate
i'm paraphrasing, go look it up
>>
>>729552871
*chad
>>
File: 1745014242138881.jpg (133 KB, 640x633)
133 KB
133 KB JPG
>>729548887
AI is good and I'm tired of pretending it isn't

All this does is keep artistfags, unionfags, writerfags, and voice actor fags in check

>oh noooo now i can't make 200,000.00 recording 5 hours of voices (if that)
>oh nooooo now i can't make 10,000.00 a month on patreon drawing furry porn oh noooo
>>
>>729552965
based otakus
>>
>>729552965
Based
>>
>>729548887
>AIfag trying to deliberately muddy the distinction between procedural generation and AI slop
>>
>>729552965
So you do think the money that companies will save by replacing all those VAs and artists with AI will end up making your games cheaper? Or any better in the slightest?
>>
>>729548887
Two things that share a feature are not automatically equivalent.
>>
>>729554459
nope, aaa games aren't good anyway
>>
>>729554181
Thing is even companies are doing that, everything is labeled AI these days. Shit like NPC behavior and schedule? Oh yeah they're AI enhanced now (it's the same kind of AI our programmers coded 10 years ago but don't tell the investors we need the AI gibs)
>>
>>729550318
My biggest gripe with it is the fact that it's getting flooded everywhere, to the point where shit people make gets harder and harder to find. Low IQ subhumans feel the absolute need to dump every piece of slop they can to the rule 34 sites, often not even bothering to properly tag it so it can be filtered out.
>>
>>729554547
They absolutely do
>>
>>729552185
Who cares, it's the same thing. You don't have to memorise every detail of something to copy it.
>>
>>729555589
>where shit people make gets harder and harder to find
If it's harder to find that's because it's not as good and doesn't deserve to be found.
>>
>>729552664
This.
>>729548887
Apples & Oranges, OP
>>
i just dont like hades 2 at all i hate this game its such a massive downgrade from the 1st game fuck this game
>>
File: 1682904402220193.jpg (26 KB, 450x297)
26 KB
26 KB JPG
>>729552965
AI looks like shit and sounds like shit. Why should something that puts out bad quality content 99% of the time?
>>
>>729558014
hope your fav nepotistic eceleb see this
>>
>>729558014
Not all the time
>>
>>729558014
But in 10 years bro, just think.
Ignore all the damage it's doing right now and don't think too hard about how when the AI bubble burst its going to blow up the entire economy.
>>
>>729548970
It's literally the same shit. It's machine generated content.
>>
>>729548887
Yeah I hate starfield
>>
>>729548887
Procedural generation isn’t ai and ai isn’t procedural generation
People are becoming incredibly stupid about ai. In 5 years people will be calling literally any piece of technology AI…
>>
>>729548887
retard
>>
>>729561471
>In 5 years people will be calling literally any piece of technology AI…
blame the marketers labeling anything AI because AI is TEH HOT THING right now
>>
>>729554459
nta but yes I do think that. mainly because I am not mentally challenged and I can see what's coming.
anyone who thinks that EVERY SINGLE GAME won't use AI for 3D assets in the future is genuinely mentally challenged

>>729558014
I already think it's better at VA than most western VAs. certainly it's better at art than most western artists
>>
>>729563937
When did this shit start? I don't remember the old fads being as bad as this.
>>
>>729563937
>AI when it was bad: fine
>AI when it started getting millions of times better: BAD, THIS IS NOT AI

>>729565567
the guy is retarded
>>
>>729565663
Can you tell jewgle to stop nerfing gemini I actually liked erping with it
>>
>>729550318
>They say it steals from artists but that's not true
as technology changes, so do the definition and means of stealing.
>it just 'looks' at a bunch of art from real people
>That's no more stealing than a person being inspired by someone else's work and using it to create their own art and style.
1. there is inherent value in a person being inspired and then learning that style. the machine is learning to copy the style, you aren't learning the style.
2. a person can only produce so much work and only so fast. a machine can produce images in that person's style at thousands of times faster. Faster being the keyword there. Companies are less likely to hire artists when they can get generative AI to spawn something that looks good enough.
>Is the entire genre of anime is stealing because arr rooks same?
anime isn't respected as a style unless it is animated well, because yea, much of it looks the same. There are anime that stand out because an artist learned from existing styles and created something themselves.
3. YOU aren't creating anything when you prompt an AI to copy someone else's work, in the same way that you're not a soldier for playing COD, or a chef for ordering fast food.
4. there wouldn't be as much controversy if not for people needing to make money to survive. Artists would snub their nose at AI, but they wouldn't care as much that it's stealing since it wouldn't potentially cut into their livelihood.

You're advocating for the homogenization of visual art. It will all look the same. Despite what the talentless degens claiming they hate "entitled artists", they sure do love to train their models off the artists' works.
>>
File: 1766859474220482.jpg (55 KB, 500x360)
55 KB
55 KB JPG
>>729548887
it's still wild to me that shitskins were so abysmally dogshit at looking up things on the internet they had to make a search engine to use a search engine for them
>>
File: 1743376676784746.jpg (97 KB, 644x425)
97 KB
97 KB JPG
>>729566514
it's so funny seeing these low IQ takes everywhere as the world quickly moves past you
>>
File: voiced by verso btw.png (1.33 MB, 1112x955)
1.33 MB
1.33 MB PNG
>coolest character is not playable, not an ally, doesn't give you boons or a lucky charm
This is horseshit.
>>
>>729548887
>handcrafted rooms with slight differences in encounters based on a set of defined rules chosen in random orders through chance
versus
>uncontrolled output based on prompts or vague inputs which won't generate a planned solution
Wow, what is the difference between these? Maybe reddit can help you spot the difference?
>>
>>729566658
>proving his point
Wow.
>>
File: IMG_20250131_125916_037.png (2.77 MB, 1267x1545)
2.77 MB
2.77 MB PNG
I don't hate ai, I hate woke shit.
>>
>>729550318
>That's no more stealing than a person being inspired by someone else's work and using it to create their own art and style.
When people steal ideas from each other they're protected by fair use as long as the work in question is transformative enough. If we give AI that same protection that means we'd be treating AI like a person.

Do you consider AI to be people? Should we treat them the same as people?
>>
>>729548887
>>729548970
kill yourself shitjeet
>>
>>729566936
AI is just a tool, the rules didn't need to change. You can copyright AI work also.
>>
>>729567014
>You can copyright AI work also.
The US copyright office disagrees
>>
>>729557052
>t. faggot that floods art tags with 1000+ pieces of shit that look clearly AI generated and no one likes makes it impossible to find the actual art.
I'll say what I always say to AI fags, if you truly believe AI is the future why are you so scared of tagging it AI so people that don't want to see it can filter it out? Don't you have pride in your creation? Do you truly believe AI is the future if you need to act like a tranny that pretends it's a real woman when everyone knows the difference?
>>
>>729550318
If a big company took a bunch of my art and told their artists to "make something that looks like this" for their game or whatever you're damn right I'd be suing for plagiarism. AI is no different



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.