Like you see, it's as British as a walk in London.
Britian games only peak between 1800-1900 otherwise i don't care about my shithole that i don't live in thank fuck.
these people don't look british at all...
>>729671105don't tell me, the only other white men in the game are all villains with white henchmen and Bond needs his multicultural team to take him down because Bond is too white and male to properly defeat the villain
why is james bond not brown too >:(
>>729672021no, actually that's not true
>>729671105
>>729672092that's what's so hilarious about this image, you can tell they DESPERATLY wanted to make Bond brown but just couldn't swing it
>>729672162Heh. Well, we've all been there after a 48 hour goon sesh
>>729671105I’m glad that James is a better man now and not a toxic masculine incel
>>729671105>all these colored people's purpose is to serve the white man(Bond)why is this allowed?
>>729671105WHY ARE MODERN GAMES SO UGLY
>>729671236>these people don't look english at all...ftfythey most definitely look british
>>729671105There hasn't been a Bond game (or movie) since Pierce Brosnan quit the role.
yeah, I just play through goldeneye again...
>>729671105Not terrible casting for the new Spy fox game.
>>729671105>we have a new assignment for you Bond.>Goldfinger has just posted an illegal anti-immigrant comment on social media>Once you're done subduing Trevelyan for not having his TV license, head to Goldfinger's lair immediately.
>>729672092>>729672202>"Lets kill 90% interest of the game instead of 100%!"are IO retarded or what
>>729671105There is no hot white British woman!?
>>729672890007, British schoolgirls in Lancaster are making allegations of rape and abuse gangs being operated by the local Pakistani community. In order to retain cohesive community relations, these girls must be silenced. I trust you know what I mean by that.
>>729673065they're a big company now so it's been very easy for Those People to infect the company. look at the protagonists for Hitman's new co-op mode, it's literally BBC porn lmao
>>729673074Bond babes are never British.
>>729673074There are 6 English women in that image
>>729671105DROPPED
>>729673119In this new mission for you bond, you have to rescue this british citizen by birth name Alaa Abd El-Fattah born in Egypt from the Egypt governament for saying anti-governament comment, say he wants to kill white people and is a terrorist, but he's a british as anyone here!
>>729673179hahahaahahahaha
>>729673179>Hitman's new co-op modeThe what? They've not mentioned it in like a year so I figured it was cancelled. They've got some more no-name celebrity packs coming up though!
>>729673491How much izzat was involved in this decision?
>>729673573none, i guarantee you they hired a bunch of fat white women for diversity reasons and the only thing fat white women think about is self-inserting themselves into franchises that were built by men and being "raped" by swarthy foreigners
Hope the industry just dies already. It doesn't deserve to exist any longer, so long as these companies pretend this notion of "modern audiences" is even real. There's no reversing the damage that's been done, we will always be operating on these false premises and thus be dealing with worse quality, enshittified and gay versions of everything. It's probably just intentional sabotage though. How fucking retarded do you have to be to think the James Bone everyone always liked is "tone deaf", if anything we are in desperate NEED of more characters like what he used to be. Filtered me as a potential customer and I pray their game fails spectacularly.
>>729673930The pop already happend with concord and most shit we see are the remanents of projects being made years ago, look at the american gaming industry state, shit is dire.
>>729671105more female slopthe cognitive dissonance between how movies/games portray women and how women act irl is crazy
>>729671105>>729673930If they truly wanted to reflect modern times Bond would fight against the british people and protect the interests of foreign oligarchs
>>729671105Moneypenny kinda cute though, ngl.
>>729673930SO true, Picaso and Leo didn't paint for "modern audiences", Mozzart and Bach didn't compose for "modern audiences"... No singular artform ever was good because it chased trends but because it expressed the heart of the artist. FUCK MODERN VIDEO GAMES!!! FUCK WESTERN "CULTURE"
>>729674095everything about that image just reeks of resentment that Bond is white and male
>>729674527Wasn't the next James Bond supposed to be black? Why didn't they go for that? They're not going to get the support of the "modern audience" with a white male Bond, they'll say it's a "typically white savior complex".
>>729674161They're fake woke pussies lol, I WISH they'd go harder, at least then it'd be funny, but they don't even go to the logical conclusion of their own delusion. It thus comes off like a demoralization OP, something purely meant to attack those who it could have appealed to by proxy, rooted from pure spite or offensive levels of being out of touch, but even then, the fact that they allow a perceived social standard to impede on their creativity shows they are probably cognizant of a superior way it could have been done.The industry is so weird, all of these companies act in this quasi-religious manner like they are desperately trying to collectively repent of the crime of being "too based" or something. I honestly don't get it and to this day, I really can't understand the intents at play.>>729674032It's a shame it takes 10 to 15 years for media to catch up.
>>729674612Idris Elba reject is since he feels he's too old for that kind of roles and don't really interesed in the franchise, didn't even watch any movie of them.
>>729671105Uh are we sure those people are British?
>>729674612>Wasn't the next James Bond supposed to be black?no it's more that the media kept "innocently speculating" to try to pressure them into doing it, creating a manufactured consensus that "everyone" wants it and "it's time". the frontrunner last time before they sold out to Amazog was some jew.
The Aston Martin DB5 is the sexiest car ever made by the way.
>>729674742You seem so intelligent, and I imagine you're hot and fuck a lot of girls.
>>729672021nah, the villain is Lenny Kravitz, lmao
>>729674965the black half of him or the jewish half of him?
>>729674478This is satire right
>>729673930If you are familiar with the James Bond franchise you'd know that the character has already changed quite a lot throughout the years and adapted to the times.
>>729673930falls on deaf ears here anon (pun intended), you have to convince the millions of normies that consume this goyslop, not us
>>729675085Both halves of him
>>729673930>How fucking retarded do you have to be to think the James Bone everyone always liked is "tone deaf",A government agent murdering people on foreign soil and instigating terrorist attacks
>>729675301Which terrorist attack did James Bond instigate?Also who did he kill that wasn't morally justified?
>>729675448Blowing up an embassy and murdering people so he doesn't get caught (on the mission he fucked up)
>>729673420god I'm glad I don't read the news any more
>>729673930Who the fuck uses "le trigger discipline" while pointing a gun at someone? The reddit finger meme is so fucking retarded
>>729675738which one was that
>>729673930>would be tone deaf todayHow? You have Muslims and Africans overtaking and making women kneel oldschool style even worse than Bond at his most hateful. You have the most anti-woke young generation in history as the only target audience willing to buy jack shit at levels that can fund the AAA budget shit shit works at.You also have the most divided political scene in British history, Kier Starmer either being called Nazi or Commie because he's schizoid, UK police now being proven to be involved in grooming gangs, and a World in wars and chaos.What fucking modern values and tonality are we talking about here?One of a minority of privileged white cuckold producers who live in walled gardens and under rocks?
>>729673930>here's those modern values I was telling you about
>>729676710What does any of that have to do with James Bond
>>729676998What the fuck does a Hitman game wearing a James Bond costume because devs have no more originality left and ran out of ideas, have to do with James Bond?What does a shitty marketing statement about taste and modern values have to do with James Bond?
>>729676921>look up motorbike sales by country>Africa has the least in the entire World>look up motorbike demographics by gender>men overwhelmingly lead>only place on Earth where women are getting on parity level is China, black women are nowhere to be seenMaaaaaaan, talk about modern values and retards who espouse them not even being able to validate them.
>>729677109Well you see, it's a game about James Bond, and that statement pertains to their interpretation of the character
>"Greetings, Forty S -ehh- James. Today your target is Mr. Birkett, a notorious racist, sexist, mysoginist, transphobe, and a prominent member of Provid- I mean SMERSH. The Q department modified your 'BAME ally' bracelet to help you stay inconspicous in this white supremacist crowd. Stay vigilant, and good hunting."
>>729677252You should look up what a motorbike is nextAnd while you're at it, consider that fiction does not have to adhere to the law of averages at that
>>729677716Damn, unrealistic that an anti-trans diatribe would lead to consequences in the UK
>>729677691It's a game about brand milking, and the interpretation based on statements that can't meet any standards in reality.>>729677795"a two or three-wheeled motor vehicle steered by a handlebar from a saddle-style seat."Dumbshit. And while you're at it consider that making statements about modern values should at least entitle a bare minimum of documented education on modern values, which this developer doesn't have.
>>729678034>and the interpretation based on statements that can't meet any standards in reality.Fuck you on about>And while you're at it consider that making statements about modern values should at least entitle a bare minimum of documented education on modern values, which this developer doesn't have.Like, for real, what are you basing this all onHow are you interpreting their statement"Documented education on modern values", lmao get real
>>729675196I know he has because I've watched every Bond film up until the Daniel Craig films, of which I only watched (and forgot) Casino Royalle. Obviosuly he changed, but even with the different personalities with different actors (at least prior to Daniel Craig), fundamental charictaristics stayed the same and his alpha male persona stayed the same. Making James Bond anything but mysoinistic to feminist sensibilities is just to sacrifice his whole character. You literally can't serparate that from James Bond, and nobody, NOBODY would want that.
>>729678034She's riding a moped you muppet
>>729678471>Making James Bond anything but mysoinistic to feminist sensibilities is just to sacrifice his whole character.They already did that after Sean Connery, who was himself quite misogynistic>You literally can't serparate that from James Bond, and nobody, NOBODY would want that.I would venture to guess that literally nobody except a handful of internet weirdoes would insist that James Bond absolutely must be a misogynist
>>729678325>Fuck you on aboutFuck you on about? What modern values bitch?>Like, for real, what are you basing this all onUK government keeping a nice track of how fucked their social stability has been going, with no improvements anywhere.The fuck are you basing it on? Feel good headcanon?>>729678481>a mopedNo shit Einstein, and what category do mopeds fall under? Let's consult the dictionary you genetic waste.
>>729671105They all look boring as fuck. Bond movies almost never have interesting characters unless they're on the cartoonish end.
>>729678583>I would venture to guess that literally nobody except a handful of internet weirdoes would insist that James Bond absolutely must be a misogynistYou'd venture wrong.Most popular female literature now involves rape and monsters and beasts.Kingsman already exists as a brand for a "moral" spy, and it does it better than this shit ever could.The current political climate in entertainment also demands and loves purely asshole interpretations of protagonists, especially for spies who are seen as garbage people universally and indeed are as such.We went over this with Binary Domain before.This ain't gonna be any different.Devs are tone deaf. But hey, the market will prove who is right and who is wrong in the end.
>>729678669Okay, so you don't have an answer. Good try though.
>>729678583I said "to feminist sensibilities", and to those sensibilities anything which magnifies the difference between the nature of men and women like the sexual dynamic of dominance and submission is that.
>>729678996Say it anon, what are these modern values James Bond must adhere by?Because if it's rape rates being the highest in UK since 2002, then Rapist Bond it is.
>>729678974>Most popular female literature now involves rape and monsters and beasts.James Bond is not a "bodice ripper" and does not aim for the same audience or the same effect.>Kingsman already exists as a brand for a "moral" spy, and it does it better than this shit ever could.This is the film that ends with him doing the Princess of Sweden up the pooper but asking her in a gentlemanly tone, yeah? Yeah, really mature, feminist take on the genre.>The current political climate in entertainment also demands and loves purely asshole interpretations of protagonists, especially for spies who are seen as garbage people universally and indeed are as such.So you're saying that they should update the character to adhere to modern values?>We went over this with Binary Domain before.Did we? I don't think I've even thought of that game since 2012. How is it relevant?>>729679079Ah, so you're attributing imaginary statements to them and then getting upset at them for you having imagined it
>Okay, so you don't have an answer. Good try though.
>>729679134Yeah, I reckon that's not it, and I don't think that you would argue otherwise in good faith. So what are you doing, exactly?
>>729679079These aren't my values we're talking about by the way. It's been a thing for a long time, feminist sorts having a stick up their ass about rather innocuous things like "damsels in distress". Don't look at me, look at them.>>729679171>Ah, so you're attributing imaginary statements to them and then getting upset at them for you having imagined itYou're dishonest. This reminds me of a little quote from a Scotsman.
>>729671105>they brought Lennie James in for thisMight save it, actually.
>>729671105where the fuck are the white people ?
>>729679296>This reminds me of a little quote from a Scotsman.How about you first prove that they're Scotsmen in any way at all thenAnd no, not putting sugar in their porridge isn't it
>>729679171>James Bond is not a "bodice ripper" and does not aim for the same audience or the same effect.Devs disagree given they are aiming for the modern audience and this is it.>This is the film that ends with him doing the Princess of Sweden up the pooper but asking her in a gentlemanly tone, yeah? Yeah, really mature, feminist take on the genre.As mature as feminism can get yes. This is the "modern sensibilities" Bond you are working towards, not-Bond.>So you're saying that they should update the character to adhere to modern values?Which are the old Bond values now, sexism and misogyny at an all time high, rape rates highest since 2002, grooming gangs within police, Feminists whining about men and then getting knocked up by one who beats them in the bedroom while whining at men who didn't to take responsibility for it. The usual that already existed in the 60s.Funny how history rhymes.>Did we? I don't think I've even thought of that game since 2012. How is it relevant?Very relevant in that an evil playthrough is the most popular playthrough as is the trend now. Baldur's Gate III also proves this with stats on Demiurge, but I'm guessing you don't even know that.So this Bond is tone deaf and boring as shit. Now that's comedy gold.>>729679220Here's your modern values straight from the government itself anon. The fuck are you gonna do about them? Well, nothing, that's what. A James Bond game won't either.
>>729672092Because his name is Bond, James Bond. Not James Brown.
>>729679296So are you aware that "Damsel in Distress" is a storytelling trope and that James Bond, as a character within the story, isn't the one in charge of it?
>>729679220What do you mean? What are the modern values of the world we live in?Be honest.>Negrophilia worships nigger behavior as such being a rampant criminal scumbag is praised as "just a prank" no matter how illegal>Rape rates are through the roof and in the UK especially, child rape is essentially legal>Joking about child rape is also common now with how many joked about Epstein and the Epstein files only to unironically be saying "THIS ISN'T FUN" when they release and see it's about a child rapistWhat are these modern values they're speaking of? We can see in terms of actions what they are but something tells me the words and actions aren't going to match.
>>729679471I wasn't talking about "no true Scotsman", and I'm also not even sure what the fuck you are talking about now. Need I explain the world to you from the bottom up hatchling faggot? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxQqaG4gl9A>>729679569Lmao what??? What are you even getting at here? What does that have to do with literally anything I said?
>>729671105>MC is a white manwooooow how original....Yeah I'm not buying this dogshit racists game
>>729672092don't worry he'll be gay or at least bi
>>729679502>Devs disagree given they are aiming for the modern audienceNote: they did not actually say that>and this is it.It's not; these are different demographics>As mature as feminism can get yes. This is the "modern sensibilities" Bond you are working towards, not-Bond.Or, alternatively, you have no idea what you're talking about>Which are the old Bond values now, sexism and misogyny at an all time high, etc.Okay, so once again, you do realise that fiction does not have to adhere to the law of averages? And also that statistics do not necessarily reflect the values of our society? This is a complete non-point. A false equivalence.>Very relevant in that an evil playthrough is the most popular playthrough as is the trend now. Literally what the fuck are you on aboutBinary Domain is more than a decade old>Baldur's Gate III also proves this with stats on Demiurge, but I'm guessing you don't even know that.I did not, nor do I care, because I frankly fail to see the relevance.>Here's your modern values straight from the government itself anon. So do you get a kick out of conflating unrelated words, or what? Does making shit arguments make you feel like a big boy? What compels you to do this, honestly? Are you honestly going so far as to delude yourself that this is what they're referring to? Or are you just that desperate to call them probably liars and remove any and all frame of reference for what "modern values" might actually refer to? What's your actual reason for pushing this false equivalence?
>>729679765>I wasn't talking about "no true Scotsman", and I'm also not even sure what the fuck you are talking about now.Oh, pretending not to understand me? How quaint.
>>729679765>Lmao what??? What are you even getting at here? What does that have to do with literally anything I said?You're bringing up "Damsels in Distress" in a discussion about the values that the character holds. As a character in the story, his values are not what affects this. Unless he's the one kidnapping them, I guess. So you bringing it up is irrelevant.I'm going to generously assume you genuinely misunderstood that.
probably end up being the male equivalent to this
>>729679892>Note: they did not actually say thatNote: The picture posted by anon does not say the exact specific words out, the article content, that is to say Martin Emborg, says it outright.Nice try though.>It's not; these are different demographicsExcept they aren't.>Or, alternatively, you have no idea what you're talking aboutOr alternatively, Kingsman is what this Bond is trying to be, and you are now stuck with this hot potato in your hand defending cognitively dissonant crap.>Okay, so once again, you do realise that fiction Good thing we are not talking fiction but a creative director's statement in marketing and development, which is not fiction but real life, and there's no credence to it.>Binary Domain is more than a decade oldAnd it proved an evil agent is popular.>I did not, nor do I care, because I frankly fail to see the relevance.It's a new game continuing the track of Binary Domain that evil playthroughs are the most popular now. So since it's not old like Binary Domain, I pushed in a new title to further prove how ignorant you are, and you now conceded to it. Thank you.>So do you get a kick out ofI get a kick out of you avoiding naming these "modern values" Bond is supposed to adhere to, and defending AAA corporate slop full of double standards, and backpedalling all over the place when presented with hard data. If you are gonna be doing marketing, do it well or don't do it at all.Loads of projection in that last paragraph of yours.Are you also the retard who doesn't know mopeds fall under motorcycles by every dictionary definition showcased via google? Seems quite ironic considering all your drivel about words and meanings. Learn English first bitch.
Who cares, it's gonna sell like hotcakes and you'll all be here coping by pretending it's not woke.
>>729672092Same reason why there hasn't been a new Bond film in years. Idris Elba won't do it.
>>729680680>hello, I am Yasuke, and my game, and its entire studio, were sold to China for the price of one hotcake>was I a good assassin?
>>729680474>the article content, that is to say Martin Emborg, says it outright.Ah, you thought I wouldn't check huh? The word "audience" actually appears zero (0) times in the article.>Except they aren't.Yes, they are. The person who's going to be playing a James Bond video game is not the person who is going to read cheap smut about werewolves, statistically speaking. >Or alternatively, Kingsman is what this Bond is trying to be, and you are now stuck with this hot potato in your hand defending cognitively dissonant crap.I'm not, because you're making entirely unsupported guess and passing them off as facts. >Good thing we are not talking fictionWe are talking about fiction. We're talking about how the character is written.>And it proved an evil agent is popular.I think you're thinking of a different game. Alpha Protocol?>So since it's not old like Binary Domain, I pushed in a new title to further prove how ignorant you are, and you now conceded to it. I have no idea what you think you're proving with this. >I get a kick out of you avoiding naming these "modern values" Bond is supposed to adhere toOh for fuck's sake, isn't it fucking obvious? He's simply not going to give a shmall corrective shlap to a woman who talks back. That's fucking it. Is that really beyond you? You really have to bring up BG3's evil route as a point of reference?>backpedalling all over the place when presented with hard data.Note: I haven't backpedalled once. I simply do not acknowledge your data as relevant to the conversation, for the reason that polite society actually does not value rape, which you might know if you lived in a Western country, Sandeep.
>>729679979Very predictable response.>>729680089I genuinely did because there's nothing obvious about that. I'd like to not "argue" with you because I think this discussion began with hostility based on assumptions rather than it being an evolution of the discussion. I think your arguing is snakey and disingenuous, and that your engagement is really just for the mere sake of argument rather than truth or understanding, but I won't suppose you thought "hmm, how do I be as irritatingly dishonest as I possibly can" so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt here.That being said I will elaborate. I wasn't talking about values at all, I never said or even implied that, I was speaking with refference to the dynamic between male and female characters in fiction (which I explicitely stated here >>729679079 ), to illustrate an example (often criticised by femininists, Anita Sarkeesian of feminist frequency was a big example of this), of a conflict between the feminist view of women in fiction. Damsels in distress are something we've seen in Bond films well beyond the Connery films. That's only once example, but this was my point in mentioning it. I expect nothing but further knit picking from you however.
>>729672890>>729673119>>729673420Everything about the UK feels like an exaggerated shitpost but it's completely serious and real occurrences
>>729681119>Very predictable response.Sure, if you're going to be making predictable argumentsI'd also like to add that accusing your opponent of "pretending not to understand things" when you're blatantly misunderstanding the quote under discussion here is not just ironic in and of itself, but also itself making discourse impossible, which is also ironic.
>>729680883>Hello, I am here to tell you how Africa is superior, I come from a game based on an IP by a prominent feminist, gay rights activist and BLM supporter>but you gotta pretend the game I'm in isn't woke because it sold very well and it made some trannies mad or something
>>729671105>007, we have recieved intel that a 13 year old British girl is planning to go to the news after her and her 10 year old sister were raped by Muslim immigrants. She must be stopped at all costs. -M (Muneebi)
>>729681119>I genuinely did because there's nothing obvious about that. I'd like to not "argue" with you because I think this discussion began with hostility based on assumptions rather than it being an evolution of the discussion. I think your arguing is snakey and disingenuous, and that your engagement is really just for the mere sake of argument rather than truth or understanding, but I won't suppose you thought "hmm, how do I be as irritatingly dishonest as I possibly can" so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt here.Yes, well, likewise, I'd say.The conversation you joined was about values, and about whether or not the character should be portrayed as a misogynist. You yourself said that the *character* should be misogynistic "to feminist sensibilities" (which is kind of a weasel word) in order to be true to his character. And then you added your bit about Damsels in Distress, which simply didn't really make sense in the context of the conversation.
>>729671105It's almost 2026 op, you can make better bait than this.
>>729681065>The word "audience" actually appears zero (0) times in the article.If you are gonna lie, do it convincingly. >The person who's going to be playing a James Bond video game isNobody at this pace.However good thing there is the old toxic theory of creating a new audience out of thin air, and statistically they are going for femcels who read werewolf smut statistically speaking. Which is fine. >I'm notYou are.You were already caught in one lie. let's got more out of you.Name the values.>We are talking about fiction.We're talking a creative director's marketing buzzwords trying to connect Bond to the real world, but failing to correlate to what modern values are.You can play these PR marketing mental gymnastics alone, but this is what it is.Yeah I'm thinking Alpha Protocol. Binary Domain slid into subconscious. On that part I'm retarded.>I have no idea what you think you're proving with this.What modern values is the Director talking about?>He's simply not going to give a shmall corrective shlap to a woman who talks back.So he's not adhering to modern values then? Because beating up bitches is happening even more often now than in the fucking 60s in Britain, with domestic violence higher than ever.He's gonna be a reckless retard who jumps out a plane because fuck it, instead of calculative, by the director's own words; but he won't bitchslap a bitch to get information out of her where he's suddenly calculative?You know what this smells like? Cognitive dissonance and poor writing.Try again.>Note: I haven't backpedalled once.You have, and now you are ignoring being the retard who didn't know a moped falls under motorcycles yet wanting to give English lessons.>your dataGovernment data. >for the reason that polite society actually does not value rapeClearly you do given the grooming gang coverups by your own police, and record rape rates happening over there, as well as a massive rise in rape fiction popularity.Facts and Logic > Feels
>>729681254Once again, you aren't honest, your are a disingenuous liar but I'll continue to engage for my own amusement.>when you're blatantly misunderstanding the quote under discussion hereAh, hold on there, the words in the image were "pretending not to understand things", I didn't pretend. There's nothing necesarilly wrong with not understanding something, that is neither a logical or epistemic error. I furthermore followed up on your elaboration clarifying my intent, but as I predicted, you didn't engage with any of the subject matter and instead nitpicked for the sake of argument. Do keep me posted bot-kun.
>>729681430>Hello, I am game made by Feminist which is boycotted by Troons, which managed to fracture Feminism into two isles of Terfs everlower Troon-supporting "allies">I'm supposed to be some kind of counter-argument rather than a hilarious example of Feminists and Troons eating each-other>Oh and black snape has managed to turn every Feminist racist all of a sudden and now the actor is being changed, because of femcel outrage
I never got why someone would be so suicidally devoted to a government. It’s so retarded. What kind of mindset would you rationalize sacrificing everything for a government that won’t even remember your name?
Also pic related
>>729671105I unironically hate Patrick Gibson more as James Bond than the rest of the casting.He just doesn't look like Bond. He's such a dork.
>>729682286He looks like fucking Tom Holland Spider-Man.
>>729671236I went to London for the first time this summer and I can assure you brits look like this.
>>729681783>If you are gonna lie, do it convincingly.You took that from a different article, genius. We were talking about this one: >>729673930. >We're talking a creative director's marketing buzzwords trying to connect Bond to the real world, but failing to correlate to what modern values are.No, Sandeep, rape is not a modern value. I don't care what you think statistics prove. >On that part I'm retarded.Not just that one.>So he's not adhering to modern values then?Anon, I've told you before, this is a false equivalence. Rape is not normalised or acceptable in society. >but he won't bitchslap a bitch to get information out of her where he's suddenly calculative?This is also a deliberate misunderstanding on your part; you're changing the scenario to where the violence against a woman is instrumental rather than motivated by misogyny, then smugly pretending you made a point.>You know what this smells like? Cognitive dissonance and poor writing.Yeah the smell must be bad on your end.>Government data.Oh, you think that was the issue? No, the issue is you thinking rape statistics tell us anything about "values". >Clearly you do given the grooming gang coverups by your own policeWhy would anything have to be covered up that's in accordance with societal values? I know you're trolling but at least be internally consistent. >Facts and Logic > FeelsValues literally are "feels" you daft twatAnyway, if I understand you correctly, the problem is that James Bond is being made to adhere to "modern values" instead of misogyny, except misogyny IS a "modern value", but they're actually not making him adhere to "modern values", and you know this because you obviously know what they mean by "modern values" even as you're pretending not to understand what is meant by it? That about right?
>>729682203Ask this anon:>>729681065He unironically thinks Western societies don't tolerate rape when two of them were named rape capitals of the World two times in the past decade, Sweden and Australia; while USA and Britain are fairing worse than ever before in history on those points.But he wants to talk about poojeets, even though his own stance is what brings poojets to his surroundings to gangrape his dumb mother when she's taking a shit in the street while James Bond's government looks the other way and Metropolitan Police records it for their grooming wank archives.It's hilarious, but eh.I'mma go cook a nice meal and leave now, known the meal will taste better than the game will sell.They already had failures with Hitman, might as well have one with Bond too.
Said it in another thread but the funny thing is that we already have a Woke About Women James Bond, that was one of the main jokes of him
>>729682457So you're genuinely arguing that rape is a Western value? That is your knock-out argument? I guess being a disingenuous twat is a 4chan value, considering the overwhelming statistics. No one here values honesty, logic, or facts, least of all you.
>Another thread whining about migrant rapeThis would be more genuine if you didn't think all women are liars who lie about rape, and if you actually pushed for rape kits to be processed. Just be racist, it's easier
>>729682417>>729682612>No, Sandeep, rape is not a modern value.>So you're genuinely arguing that rape is a Western value? Hey Epstein, Prince Andrew, BBC, calm down. It's okay to admit you have a problem Feminism fails to correct. It's okay Sweden and Australia were delcared rape capitals two times of the World surpassing South Africa for a moment. It's just skill issues.
>>729682623No, but they approve, see. It's a modern value we all share, one that James Bond ought to adhere to to keep up with the times. Clearly.
If anybody can make a proper Bond game, it's IOI.nuHitman was basically a Bond movie. I hope they do it justice. because I have no other games to look forward to
>>729682779You have a problem staying on topic huh? Why would we want to correct anything? It's all in line with our modern values, after all. You're not talking sense.
>>729671105Greenway is our nigga, he's cool.
>>729682830Honestly if:>You liked Hitmanand>you're not autistic about imaginary culture war bullshitthen I see no reason not to be at least cautiously optimistic.
>>729682830I used to think that but the recent trailers and gameplay demonstration have me second guessing that thought.It looks like a heavily stripped down and linear version of Hitman WOA.Which is exactly the opposite of what I wanted.I'm really hoping the Uncharted style sequences aren't representative of the actual moment to moment gameplay.
>>729671105lmao M as a jeet and Moneypenny as a nigger is almost perfect. They just need Moneypenny to wear a hijab and it'll be emblematic of modern day England.
>>729671105As you needed more proof than brown people can't make a game by themselves or for themselves, at all.It's like watching pubic louses cling at a pair of (white) balls.
>>729682779>>729682884In fact the clear tragedy here is that this young man is being punished for no reason at all, honestly, what kind of backwards place is that, to punish people for rape?
>>729682963I'm hoping the linearity is just for the trailers, just like when they made a trailer for Hitman 2016 and some people were upset when the full game wasn't a linear narrative.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sM9j0xTG1Fw
>>729672890A game arresting people for draconian laws would be pretty fun.
>>729682884Precisely, it's in line with your values, that's why video games can't correct it. Because video games have never correct the community since 2012 and won't start now, as misogyny and sexism are as rife now as they were then. What kind of sense, logic, or arguments even leads one to be so retarded as to think video games can change young male's opinions on women? Because there ain't a single scientific study supporting this I'll tell you that, so you gotta pull the notion out of your ass. Twitch certainly learned this the hard way.>>729683032No, the clear tragedy is that more and more men are doing it despite punishment. Gee I wonder why this is happening? Truly a conundrum.
>>729683202Very cool refutation of arguments literally nobody made, you're such a cool dude Anon>No, the clear tragedy is that more and more men are doing it despite punishment.Why? You're the one espousing these values more than anyone ITT.
>>729671180wtf they had video games in the 1800s?
>>729681570>The conversation you joined was about valuesNo buddy, let's get one thing straight, the first post in this line of conversation WAS MINE, I began this line of conversation, I didn't just join in.>You yourself said that the *character* should be misogynistic "to feminist sensibilities" (which is kind of a weasel word)There's nothing weasily about it, these are the sensibilities to which "Old school Bond" is "controversial", they are the only sensibilities to which it would be so, one of James Bond's main and defining charictaristics OBVIOUSLY is his larger than life alpha male persona. He is an embodiment of the masculine archetype, and he was always unapologetically so. """equality""" is obviously one of the most foundational things in feminism, they OBVIOUSLY are at conflict with "gender roles", things which suggest natural roles of sexes, including but not limited to the sexual dynamic of male dominance and female submission which is prevalent in every Bond at least up until once again, Daniel Craig (who I've said I haven't watched the films of save for Casino Royalle which I forget). These are things which early feminist writers who are considered something akin to foundational figures THEMSELVES have explicitely stated they are at war with. This isn't up for debate.
