[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: hair on vs off.jpg (317 KB, 1280x720)
317 KB
317 KB JPG
>Turning off the "Hair" practically doubles the FPS and in some cases looks outright better (when it gets wet in the rain)

This is just a cutscene example. It gets worse when you're actually in the thick of action.

Are there any other examples of poorly programmed/fucked up graphical settings?
>>
>hair strands high
60fps
>hair strands normal
60fps
>hair strands off
60fps

Not my problem.
>>
>>729788818
This is how hair works in any game with hair rendering, it's not simply poor programming. Obviously rendering individual strands of hair is going to be expensive to compute.
>>
>>729788818
>3060Ti
>a budget card from 2 generations ago can't use all the newest tech
>>
looks good especially in gameplay with the camera distance, runs fine
>>
>brought to you by Nvidia HairWorks (tm)
>>
>>729788818
>Demake

WHO CARES SAGERU this dogshit THREAD
>>
works on my machine
>>
>>729788818
I swear I've seen this thread multiple times with the same image now. What the fuck is wrong with you?
>>
>>729789732
Cope
>>
>>729789732
dead internet theory
https://arch.b4k.dev/v/search/text/Turning%20off%20the%20%22Hair%22/type/op/
>>
>>729789732
bots digging up old content from the archives
>>
>>729788818
This is why people are paying 800 dollars for graphics cards? Barely noticeable changes that can only be pointed out if you freeze frame and check the image like you are analyzing jfk assassination video? This is why graphics stagnated. Its all ray tracing bs and minimal changes like op related taking resources from your GPU.
>>
>>729789271
Looks out of place.
It isn't even receiving light the same way as the rest of the image.
Feels like someone photoshoped a high res hair cutout and placed it on top of Leon's head
>>
>>729788818
>Immersionfags ruin [gaming aspect]
color me shocked
>>
>>729788818
PC games always had one of these, the earliest example I can think of are soft shadows in 2005's FEAR. That one option would cut your fps in half if not more.
If FEAR released today people would give it shit for bad optimizations.
>>
>>729788818
if you don't have a habit to immediately go to settings and lower the settings, you're a performative gamer
>>
>>729793151
The real change is playing in 4k imo
>>
So this is just what nu/v/ has become. Endless copy pasted bot threads.
Reddit board.
>>
Can we have hair that consists of textures close to each other instead of whatever they've been doing this generation?
>>
>>729789271
this is so RE engine it hurts
>>
File: file.png (3.44 MB, 2560x1440)
3.44 MB
3.44 MB PNG
There's no exclusive upgrade after maxing a weapon?
>>
>>729788818
This shit is ridiculous, you should just up the render resolution.
>>
>>729788818
for how otherwise good bamham knight looks its lone antialiasing setting is pretty arse
>>
File: 1701182348169.webm (2.68 MB, 1630x1078)
2.68 MB
2.68 MB WEBM
>>729788818
Why can't modern devs do hair right?
>>
>>729794734
>faggots are now hating on RE Engine becasue... reasons?
I'd rather they use this actual soulful custom engine than follow everyone in using UEslop.
>>
>>729796123
I fucking hate how we still don't have proper soft body physics in 2025+1.
>>
>>729788818
screenshots doesn't do it justice, it looks at ton more better in motion. With hair strand off, the hair is literally static and doesnt move
>>
>>729796743
Except how it looks like shit in the rain
>>
>>729788818
yes, we have known that physx is garbage for roughly 15 years now. Are you only just learning why people hate nvidia?
>>
>>729788818
Look, if your shitty computer can't handle rendering hair, just download a bald mod or something.
>>
>>729796123
because proper good hair doesn't do individual strand shit. The best looking video game hair is just a very well made part of the bone rig that then is 3d sculpted as best as possible to look like its made from individual strands.
There's no reason to actually make it out of individual strands. It looks horrible and is destroyed by aliasing and render artifacts. Just look at the hair in Monster Hunter Wilds
>>
File: 20251212210732_1.jpg (1.15 MB, 3840x2160)
1.15 MB
1.15 MB JPG
Modded hair no hair strands looks best.
>>
>>729799060
BOGGED
>>
File: 20260101223401_2.jpg (361 KB, 2560x1440)
361 KB
361 KB JPG
The hair effects are nice though.
>>
>>729800315
The hair effects in the new RE trailer are too over the top like the hair lighting.
>>
>>729796123
Dunno, Stellar Blade developers were obsessed with her hair and the final result still mid. So mid that most people prefer to play her with short hair.
>>
>>729801935
The hair physics in Stellar blade honestly looks like shit. Atleast it doesnt affect the performance.
>>
>>729800315
who is this ugly goblina?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.