*sigh*Bapanada.
>>729839941NAOO
>>729839941I like map guy more
why was hollow knight like 20 times as good as silksong turned out to be
>>729841291It had soulSilksong is forced soul
>>729841402>>729841291Or Hollow Knight was made as creative expression whereas Silksong was DLC bloated into a standalone game plagued by a weird combination of obligation and feature creep
>>729839941I'd be so deep in that bugssy
>>729839941I'd Bap her nada.
Which game had the better NPCs? I like HK more in almost everything but I loved the fleas from Silksong
>>729841291One has Soul and the other has Silk
>>729841291I think Silksong is the better game, but Hollow Knight definitely had more soul.Silksong still has soul too, don't get me wrong, but just not as much.Also, the community around the games degraded during the long gap between the release of Hollow Knight and Silksong.
>>729843672I really like Silksong's NPCs but none can reach the mighty Zote's level.
>>729841291>>729841510This.SS is a glorified DLC and it's obvious. The most grossly over-glorified DLC to ever exist, but still.
>>729841291Silksong is better than Hollow Knight in every way.
>>729844537>SS is a glorified DLC and it's obvious.That status still belongs to TOTK.SS has a whole ass new map, new enemies, new abilities, new NPCs, new music, new protagonist, one can't call it a DLC just because it looks like the first game. You don't see people calling New Vegas a DLC for 3
>>729841291The atmosphere in Hollow Knight is just better for the kind of story it's trying to tell. Silksong has beautiful places and whatnot, but only a couple of those really serve the narrative purpose of the game, the rest are just obstacle courses with a theme.
>>729844662Both games were exploded DLC. The difference is that Nintendo didn't have to make TotK while Cherry did have to make Silksong
>>729839941Sex with Iselda.
