>RTX 4080
>RTX 2070 Super
yawnchange topic
>RTX 5070
I can't believe it's been three years already.
should i buy a 5080 if i can?
>RX 9060 XT 16 Gb
>RX 7800XT
>>729871270I almost bought a 5090 a few days ago to upgrade
>>729871814i just bought one (at $2k) because of all that shit about price increases (both the rumor and the notice from asus to partners)gonna leave it in the box for a bit and collect my free money later if they all start to creep up big time, and pull use it if not
>rx6800xt reference model straight from amd store
>>729871520why
>>729871270I have one of these hats. If fact it's the only hat I own. Same exact design and color.
>4070ti super
>4080 Super
>RTX 4080 Mobile
>>729872897its sepia?
Explain why I need anything better than my GTX4080 when every graphically demanding game made is filthy shit slop abysmally badly jeetcoded in UE5.
>4070 Ti
>3060 ti
>>729871431What do we do bro?
>3050 Laptop GPU
>1050ti
>RTX 4070 Super
>meanwhile the games you buy overpriced gpus to run
>1660ti
just boughted a 9070 xt before the prices go upmy 3060 can rest
>>729871742You and me, TOGETHAAAAAAAAA
>>729871270Just give in with RTX 5070ti (same perf and in some cases better than RTX 4080)
>>729871489>I5 12600k
>5090
>rtx2060s
>>729876432>no physx support means it has shit performance in older titleskeep it, 5xxx series was an actual mistake
>>729876820Anon.... they just add physx support on latest update
>3060tiI can hodl for like 2 more years before modern games start dropping below 1080p 60fps
>>729876820uhhh, they do have it again now though. It was a bit of a news last year (month) bro
>>729876878>>729877081>exceptionsNOT GOOD ENOUGH
__PS5 I"ll breeze to 2029/2030 with no problems.
>RTX 3080
>>729876878>>729877081issue was only partially fixed or so i've heard
>>729878214I wouldn't know. I never cared enough for that particular feature. Then again I'm on 580.88 and it works well with my UV settings.
>>729877548PS6 will be out next year dude
>>729871270R5 4650 vega 7. It's fine. New vegas runs great and I'm playing splinter cell 2002 for the first time.
>>729878709NTA but fat fucking chance. I bet $100 that's not happening anymore.
>>729871270>RX 9070XT
>>729871270rtx 2050
i dont understand these threads. it seems to be the older the graphics card the more insane the attached pic is, but it seems the opposite for some. I have a 2070RTX from like 2021. is that good? bad? it was one of the first with ray tracing I know that much. I just dont "get it". am I just and "unc"? is my attached gif silly enough to match my card's performance?
>RTX4060
>>729871270>GTX 1050 mobile
>1660S
>>729879573What she is about to inject, anon?
>>729877404>>729878214Well, either they are doing some form of emulation on Blackwell GPUs or they must be manually replacing the CUDA software in each specific game with a 64-bit version that can utilize the supported CUDA software on 50-series. That's also likely why there's an extremely limited selection of supported games, they have to manually dive into each games files, figure out what to replace and how to fix it, and do a lot of QA testing to make sure they didn't break the game.>NVIDIA>QA testingI know...I know.
>>729879504no that's bad and you should feel like shit about it becauuuuusseeee uuuhhhh you don't play valarante with rtx on >rx 6800 (also unsure about this thread)
