What are your thoughts on GTA 6?>hopesStat system like GTA SAReturn of weapons like the Flamethrower and Chainsaw>FearsStory mode reduced in favor of OnlineRealismslop like GTA 4 and RDR 2>expectationsGTA V2Either way I am going to buy it on Day One even if it costs $100.
Jason is fucking hot. Gay sex with Jason.
>>729884763something something woke
>>729884817this except Jason gets a sex change to become a big titty tranny hooker who has sex with Lucia
I will play it. They never put out a new Grand Theft Auto where I said "this isn't fun". It is fun, they make fun action games. The people who insist that 6 is some kind of failure are people that are on insane levels of cope
>>729884763The game isn't out for another year; longer for pc.Don't have expectations and you won't be disappointed if it's shit.Those are my thoughts.
>>729884763>HopesDon't be tedious >FearsIt will be tedious >Expectations It will be tedious just like rdr2 and gta5, but the story won't be bad.
>What are your thoughts on GTA 6?Brownslop
>>729884763I just want them to take the RDR2 engine, up the character agency when it comes to animations and make try to blend GTA4 and GTA5 driving. GTA4 cars all handled like dumpsters and GTAV driving was too braindead, mix a bit of both
>>729884763I hope they won't make the female protagonist into a wilting flower that needs help every fucking second. I hope she gets to have agency, and that she gets good writing. My fear is that because it's burgers writing the story, they will fuck it up and make her into an emotionally charged mongoloid that does dumb shit 24/7 that the other protagonist have to get her out of. Because that is how it almost always shakes out when burgers write women. I have hope though, because some of those involved in the writing are really good and have good track records.
>>729884763Story mode should only exist to teach heist mechanics.My hope GTAO is ready day one and I can transfer my character. I personally only care about GTAOSo I hope flying cars and the oppressor aren't there day one
>>729884763I'm hopeful. Rockstar as a company sucks balls though, can't play GTA IV that I bought on steam 15 years ago without installing and logging into the Rockstar launcher, and their takedowns over mods suck.I'll buy the game used.
>>729884763more focus on the female character, I'm quite excited to finally be able to play as a female in story mode.
That all GTA consuming normalfags will fuck off back to discord/reddit.
>>729884763Zero interest because it's only on ps/xbox. But overall I'd only buy it if it was on Nintendo same date as the others, otherwise I might as well just pirate the game on PC. Rockstar games are mid. You see people get really upset when you say that but it's really true, their mission design has literally never changed. I also don't think there's gonna be tremendous focus on the single player because if there was they would have made it on Nintendo as well, the focus is on the live service and selling shark cards. I just hope the driving is good and there's tons of great music. In a way the music is my worst fear, that it's just chockful of musicians that were never even really relevant or their popularity has completely faded so Rockstar got them at a great price so there's tons of their mid music which feels completely pointless. I'd rather have tons of great indie music, any small musicians would instantly say yes to that 20-25k or whatever it was
>>729884763The dream is real
>>729884763>Story mode reduced in favor of OnlineI doubt it will even launch with online, they'll probably roll it out in 2027>Realismslop like GTA 4 and RDR 2They'll definitely carry over part of RDR2 like increased random encounters, if the map is massive you need incentive to go exploring
>>729887239Rockstar are the best at open world games, nobody comes close for immersion and detail. >because if there was they would have made it on Nintendo as wellSwitch wouldn't have run it and a Switch 2 port will take extra time, GTA was a always a Playstation franchise. The single player game will have over a hundred hours of content, it will be their biggest map and likely include missions in Colombia or some other part of South America. For most people it will be the game of the generation. Red Dead Redemption 2 was also better than Nintendo games.
>>729889476>Rockstar are the best at open world games, nobody comes close for immersion and detail.I get the tech is cool but GTA 4 had mid driving but better shooting, GTA 5 had bad driving and bad shooting, RDR2 fixed a lot of things obviously but the mission design felt pretty tedious. If GTA 6 fixes all of the downsides then we're talking. Technology for the sake of technology is boring. You're just gonna see it once and think "oh cool" and never think about it again. I>a Switch 2 port will take extra timeIt depends entirely if leakers actually know anything. I think after the leaks Rockstar could have locked things down tight and started working on a Switch 2 port so I doubt it'd leak in general. Then there's the xbox series s version and rdr2 port which would speed up development significantly. I'm 50/50 on it, I could see take two being retards launching it only on ps/xbox but I could also see them embracing Nintendo at some point and it simply never leaked or it was decided around june/july that they put a bigger team working a switch 2 port pronto to get it out. >GTA was a always a Playstation franchiseYeah but Xbox still died, it's a business. It's not great for take-two or rockstar that Xbox died and microsoft started marketing PC which gta 6 isn't even on.
