why is this game not talked about more, probably one of the better rts ive played and certainly the most in depth. >sqaud is over run, everyones dead or injured >send last tank in>gets immobilized>surviving tank man gets out>direct control time>with a revolver take out 6 men and get better gear>stealth my way to a enemy tank>blow hatch and kill inside crew>use the tank to mow down the remaining enemy squad single handedly winning the match
>>729887308>Hey lets make an early war dlc>French? No, just the british Shit game
I'm more surprised no one is complaining about the pathfinding in this game. I love the game but good god I rage at the pathfinding every time
>>729888808Game is good tho
>>729887308Does it have a good campaign? Im not touching multiplayer in an rts ever.
>>729890852This.
>>729891026Not OP but I haven't touched the campaign yet, it has a conquest mode where you unlock units down a tech tree and build out your army as you do smaller skirmishes. There's also a general Skirmish mode where you can buy units actively throughout the battle I think. I will say the Men of War campaigns were alright.
>>729887308>micromanage everything down to what helmet to wearFucking trash. I don't care. I just want to play the game without babysitting every single unit down to their ammos
>>729891026It has a good campaign, a conquest mode "Also known as the Dynamic Campaign which is playable by the factions within the game. The game mode has an attacking and defense missions one after another for the player to play through." And of course a skirmish mode against AI or MP. It's a great game overall but it has some really irritating buggy pathfinding sometimes (your vehicles will stomp your own auxiliary that stands in its way) and line of sight is also weird at times.
>join someones conquest>he gives me 7 tiger tanks>a attack move forward>win mission
I just want to DC heavy tanks and one shot everything else but the game is making me babysit infantry units :(It's still occasionally fun to assume direct control of a singular unit of infantry and going on to do things that would give them a posthumous TV series in the late 90s/00s; such as killing a German squad singlehandedly, scavenging a Panzerfaust from one of them, running behind a Panther and destroying it.RTS aspects all fucking suck though, unless your units are sitting in cover. It's infinitely inferior to CoH1/2, even if it's more realistic.
>>729891305Fucking retard....... did you even play the game? Are you that incapable of playing a RTS if it includes an optional inventory for your benefit if you choose to use it? Zoomers are killing everything.
>>729891026the campaign was annoying. its the type where you get screwed on first play through and you get enjoyment only if you have experience
>>729891026Why? You're missing out on good games.
>>729891574I did, fucking idiot. You literally have micromanage these fucking shit units or else they fucking die because the their ai fucking trash just like youDon't @ me ever again
>>729891962Zoom zoom
>>729891962everytime any rts game comes up everyone complains about the AI even in top rated rts games
played this after the last call to arms and was blown away by the art style and visuals
>>729891574not the other guy, but inventory management in mow and cta is fucking garbage for 2 decades straight with no fixes in sight. no hotkeys, just a lot of mouse clicking in the APM heavy RTT game. the devs are retarded or seem to be incapable of actually improving these games mechanically since faces of war.
>>729887308Shit game with shit pathfinder and shit ai>multiplayerKys
>>729893032What's wrong with multiplayer?
No one answered the question?
I have 350 hours played so far. I only play campaign, dynamic conquest and skirmish. luv me brits, luv me Churchills, luv me piat.
/v/ got filteredDamn shame
