>RNG:(>RNG, critical hits:D
>Getting critically hit
imagine critically hitting her cervix
>>730725780I fucking hate that this gif isn't cropped the extra pixels to hide the little peek of her topwithout seeing that little white piece your brain can easily imagine she's naked, but the little white that peeks up ruins the illusion
>>730726450>hitting cervixWhere did this meme even come from?Hitting cervix is very uncomfortable or even outright painful for women who aren't used-up whores
>Attack has 90% hit rate>Misses 4 times in a row
>>730725780I know this isn't porn but my brain keeps thinking it is.
>>730726618added the little cope at the end lmao
>>730726665the angle and set looks just like a facialabuse video
>>730726665the couch, the backgroundlooks like that asian chickcropping just before any clothingall the elements are there
>>730726687>cope what do you think I am even coping with?
>>730725780i like rng
>>730726630>hit chance: 104%>miss
>>730726565have an adequate twosday, amonymous
>>730726804Im reminded of that facebook minigame in WoW pandaria failing 100% missions because it was actually 99.6%
>>730726779rng is not real because in a digital environment they can control the outcome of every action, making the term rng fake.
>>730725780She has a weird nose and eye bags and a recessed chin yet I find her hot as hell anyway. Why?
>>730726810>>730725780no one actually remembers who she is or the comic site she wrote for
>>730727030Because she's thin.
>>730725780>lust provoking image>irrelevant time wasting question
>>730727062But anon, I normally like fat bitches instead
whats the sauce on the (I think its this lady) woman who has a bit of sex on that there sofa, with a key part of the production being that she is told to use a dildo that has "daddy" written on it, right after she talks about being abused by her dad when she was a kidthanks in advanced: a woman hating connessuer.
>>730727048sara lima comic vineno one remembers bc comic vine was short lived and giantbomb has died many deaths by now
>>730725780>>730725962True
Crit: 10% for 2x damageMiss: 10% for no damageNormal hit chance: 80%In the end, your damage output is the same, but you get your casino dopamines>Raising dexterity also indirectly raises critical chance AAH>Rolling less than 1% always misses, and rolling over 99% always critsOOH
>>730726618>women who aren't used-up whoresDoubt that's a thing
>>730727383>In the end, your damage output is the samei feel like there basically has to be some sort of statistics related fuckery to make this actually not true that i'm not thinking of
>>730727465It's rare, but occasionally they are whores who aren't used-up yet.
>>730727489Out of 100 hits, 10 of them will deal no damage and another 10 of them will deal double the damage to compensate. The math works out, but with a smaller sample size (a game where you deal less hits in a rotation) you would see more variance.
>+0.4% critical hit chance>whole set gives you +2,2%>it's not additive>5.11% critical hit chance>dedicating all my gear for itSometimes balancing looks like it was done by people who can't math.
>>730727489the fact its RNG, does.what he says here proves he doesnt understand chance properly. >>730727848>10 of them will deal no damagethats not how chance works, maybe 0 deal no damage, maybe 100 deal no damage. Your damage output isnt the same, its become variable.
>>730728149>game has "0.X%" anything>game has "+ 2.X%" anything>5.11% is considered goodshit, boring game.Start with smaller numbers on stats/damage/whatever and give bigger boosts.
>>730726618who cares?
>>730726758LMAO
>>730725780>>730726810@grok make her suck a BWC
>>730727135Thats not her, but you may be talking about facial abuse?
>>730728297I do, I want my women to be happy.>>730728416>bc i am a hog and want me to simp for meis the real answer
>>730727848Crunch this then Einstein:Each point in DEX sums 1% into the roll, each point of AGI of the enemy decreases 1% of it.Considering STR = damage, and that >90 rolls crit, and <10 rolls miss... STRFAGS OR DEXFAGS. WHO WINS THE DPS RACE?
>>730725780RNG can be a good way to make the player adapt his strategy and change his approach in face of unexpected results. That, however, requires that the player actually has options. If he doesn't, there are two possible reasons: He didn't prepare properly for the unfavorable outcome, thinking that a 90% hit chance is basically guaranteed, wihich of course isn't true, so it's his fault. Or the game just doesn't give you enough ways to manage the situation accordingly, so it comes down to a reload fest, in which case it is shit game design, and the rng is only there as some sort of cargo-cult syndrome, not a design decision with actual consideration behind, because "RPGs gotta have rng in them, right?".
>>730729013none, they both lose because your game sounds insufferably shit
>>730729013depends on their AGI, if low, STR, if high, DEX.
>>730729160Also, in some games a single action matters too much, so that a bad outcome on a roll can completely ruin a fight, that would've been totally doable otherwise. Divinity OS 2 come to mind. Although this game has a lot of ways to break it over your knee, so it is forgivable in that particular case.
>50 second cutscene attack that devestates the landscape>*miss*
Games require a random element to not simply be math problems.
>>730729285>STR, CON, DEX, INT, WIS, CHA vs. disease resist build
>>730729285This wasn't fair, poor human didn't even know what was coming. Post another with a human who is actually prepared for a fight, and let's see that result.
>>730729552I don't actually expect the human to win, prepared or not, but it'd be more fun to watch.
>>730729427The random element should be the gameplay situation and reactive choice of action, not some random roll if an action succeeds and how well. All choices leading towards the action should determine the outcome.
>>7307295528% of Americans would win in that scenario.
>>730726630Fuck you Fallout 1/2. Love them games more than anything but they are completely and utterly lying fuckers>ackshully, that's just how statistics work, you can miss 3 times in a row at 95% chance to h-SHUTUP NERD. The odds of me missing a 95% chance 3 times in a row is 1 in 8 fucking thousand. You're lucky to do it in a playthrough. You certainly are not doing it several times in a single game. It's plain incorrect math. That, or they start you at the 95% and start doing math shit after the fact they don't tell you about.
>>730729221>DoTs deal percentage based damage and you don't have a cure
>>730729731*F5s**aims for the eyes**F9s until he gets a crit*
>>730728416Men can prefer whatever they want and you cannot change anything about that. What are you going to do? Rape them if they aren't into you? Good luck raping a tall, strong and muscular men. Haha.
>>730729859The only way to play, brotha. Though I'll only do it when initiating my first strike, no saving during the actual combat.
>gritty and violent m rated game>0 (zero) gorefuck this gay earth
>>730725780>critically hithttps://youtu.be/hdcTmpvDO0I
>>730729542kek, my sides.
>>730729718I'm more concerned about the fact that 28% of American's don't think they could beat a rat (or a house cat) in a fight. Considering 300 million Americans, 300 million Grizzly vs American 1v1 battles, I could see 8% winning. Provided they are given at least some sort of melee weapon.
>>730729718>think they would win>thinkanon..also what the fuck, 28% of mutts dont think they could win against a rat?6~10% thinking theyd beat a bear or gorilla is cute, but, 30% unable to best the common fucking rat? Even if you sucked at fighting, if it bites you, I mean, it hurts, but then you can just grab it and kill it, a soilent boy, or mayhaps a woman, could handle that
>>730730383>>730730313Probably just assumed they won't catch it.
>>730728491@grok exterminate the meatbags that order you to bake bland fetishes
>>730730313>Considering 300 million Americans, 300 million Grizzly vs American 1v1 battles, I could see 8% winning.what? Percentage is percentage. Whether 100 people or 1 million, 8% is 8%you think 240,000 people could beat a grizzly? How would that even be possible - a weapon Id assume is not provided but even if it were youd need more than a shiv for that, but this is a take in a fight thing so itd be kind of unsporting to allow weaponry.>>730730460maybe, ive also had a rat caged and the thing was fucking viscious, trying to pick the cage up to remove it and it was hissing and leaping at the speed of light, hitting the cage so hard the thing was bouncing a good distance each time - that kind of thing would scare a typical woman, even though its caged. So a good amount may be "I couldnt beat a rat because im terrified of them"
>>730730504what are some properly baked and seasoned fetishes?
>>730731921Netorase
>>730730714I think there lives some exceptionally talented individuals both physically and mentally. I also think luck plays a part. It said "unarmed," it never said you couldn't use the environment or lead it into a trap. I think most people answering yes to that still have in their mind using whatever resource they can and are imagining themselves out in the woods. Speaking strictly as a 1v1 in a room using your fists. No. 1v1 out in the woods starting unarmed, I think you'd be surprised. Even if you never end up with a melee weapon, some might lead it off the side of a cliff.Also, my mistake, it was 6%. The reason I scaled it up to 300 million was because at that sample size, you're going to find people that were successful. Maybe not 6%, but again, luck.
I don't see what's wrong with RNGSeems like something that only autistic control freaks would be upset about
>>730726618>Where did this meme even come from?Cringe loser virgins and porn addicts who get their knowledge of the world from porn/hentai. Describes 99% of the people that browse 4chan so you'll see that kind of thing a lot. It's why no-one here ever acts like an actual human-being, and are severely brain-damaged weirdos.
>>730725780stop posting this ugly whore
>>730726618>women who aren't used-up whoresdoes not exist
>>730725780OK ENOUGHwhere is this scene from? it's porn isn't it??
>>730730383>>730730313Allow me to remind you.Women.
>>730726618who to believe?
>>730732549wtf based cat
>>730732629The articles is mostly about light touching, and specifically warns not to be at all rough. I mean there are also people who get off on inserting stuff into their urethra, doesn't mean an average person would enjoy it.
>>730732549not just women bud
>>730732549KWAB
>>730732549>>730733262Cat owners are inherently cucks. If you have a cat, you're the pet, not the cat. Also, reminder that if you die your cat will not care and will literally eat your flesh without second thought
>>730733821#notallcats
>>730725780Why has no one found the footage of this and made a better webm that isn't 4 fucking megabytes.
Guillermo del Toro tapped that.
