[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1747956001065391.png (1.08 MB, 1600x740)
1.08 MB
1.08 MB PNG
https://www.gamesindustry.biz/the-new-owner-of-gog-discusses-taking-on-steam-the-devil-of-drm-and-following-in-nightdives-footsteps

>"I think what Nightdive is doing is the perfect example of what we would like to embark on: have these IPs, bring them to your engine, make them work, play better than ever, potentially do a spiritual successor of the game, or maybe even a new installment of the game, like what they're doing with System Shock."
>>
>>730727561
Sounds good! :)
>>
>>730727561
I have an issue with this

uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

how can I spin this negatively
>>
>>730727561
Not a bad idea. I mean they are already doing the fixing part to make them work on modern systems.
>>
Thanks Gog for saving gaming
>>
>>730727561
>>730727614
>>730727814
>>730728094
>>730728248
Samefag.
>>
>>730728331
that's a good approach. we can attack anons instead of the topic. or say buy an ad.
>>
>>730728331
>steamies seething at the mere mention of GOG
Seethe more Steamie. I bought 20 games from the GOG winter sale.
>>
>>730727561
Hope they do, they understand how to preserve games and package good mods with them sometimes too so I'd buy a gog sponsored remake
>>
i still can't get over them using scene cracks for their releases
>>
Sounds kind of pie in the sky. GOG has always been barely profitable at best; how are they going to afford to develop brand new games while also running their store? Especially now that they no longer have CDPR backing.
>>
File: file.png (1.07 MB, 1344x756)
1.07 MB
1.07 MB PNG
>>730727561
How about they contribute to open source emulator projects and wrap those around old games instead of hiring 20 californians, 100 indians and burning half a rainforest to shit out stuff like pic related?
>>
>>730727561
Good! I hope they do that. I think I trust GOG to make new versions of games that aren't a total waste of time, too. A lot of other companies rerelease stuff that just plainly suck in dozens of different ways, and they might as well have not bothered.

But who knows, maybe they'll fuck up their attempts too. Still, interested to see what they do
>>
>>730728647
Any confirmed examples?
>>
Fake News

The quote is from a guy at GOG before the buyout. The owner says they have to reevaluate the idea.

>If you had asked me two weeks ago, I would probably have given you the same answer as Bartosz did during Gamescom: that it only feels natural for GOG to expand on its business model and get even closer to the value creation, to the creative side of things for gamers. Today, I would say that we need to talk, and I hope it will be only natural.
>>
>>730727561
>>730727614
Remakes. Sure, why not? Took them long enough.
>>
>>730728542
Sleeping dogs remake.. . Honestly, if the games are awesome, I psy gladly 50.
>>
>>730728863
>open source emulator projects
Working for free, eh? Good idea. Might lead to problems with profitability, but rich people don't care, that's what banks are for. Problem is, gog isn't rich.
>>
>>730729298
I mean GOG already, for example, offers the DevilutionX source port as a free mod for Diablo.
>>
>>730727561
>Nightdive is doing is the perfect example of what we would like to embark on: have these IPs, bring them to your engine, make them work, play better than ever,
their remasters of dark forces and bladerunner were shit and ran worse than the originals
>>
>>730729471
GOG is great.
>>
>>730729471
Sure, they do need money and good remakes are the way to go. They could become number 1 doing so. Number 1 in remakes.
>>730730147
Yup.
>>
>>730728816
they're just doing remasters
>>
>>730727561
I love gog as platform, but they have issues:

- their developer experience is third rate
- they get blown out of the water with exclusivity deals with their marketshare
- their drm free approach is massive turnoff for companies who spent milions on dont-steal-my-shit solutions.

Steam has cultivated their storefront position for decades, meanwhile gog thinks they can disrupt them without innovation, worse deals and missing coverage on same features. Lunatic approach without money to back it up.
Epic at least had fortnite and engine sales to power through

Thing that keeps steam afloat on top is their resiliency for disruption. If they would go down for month people would think twice about hedging their purchases. That never happened, and never will. Snowballed their gains to perfection. Unless Gabe's replacement will become greedy scum i doubt steam will ever fail,
>>
>>730727561
Based new owner of GOG. This is why I continue to only buy games on GOG.
>>
>>730727561
They should focus on getting good indie games for their store instead
>>
>>730728996
No, he's just talking out of his ass
>>
>>730731132
>their drm free approach is massive turnoff for companies who spent milions on dont-steal-my-shit solutions.

People who make good games dont give a shit about DRMs, see last games of the year, only retrogrades with decades old decadent franchises are obsessed with DRMs
>>
File: GOGDRM.png (134 KB, 1472x314)
134 KB
134 KB PNG
>>730731132
they mentioned this in the article which I'm sure you read
>>
>>730727561
>>730728248
Buy an ad
>>
>>730734332
We don't need additional DRM in the age of 200-300GB games
>>
>>730727561
They should take over restoration of Saints Row 2. This should be their duty
>>
>>730727561
>All they had to do was tweak the code a bit to make a 16-bit program run on a 64-bit OS
No thanks, I don't want to upgrade my GPU to play a 25-year old game because you copy pasted the code into UE5
>>
File: 1605935826855.jpg (158 KB, 1280x720)
158 KB
158 KB JPG
>>730727561
Good path for GOG to go down, evolution of their dreamlist and a further niche to distinguish themselves from Steam. My reasonable remaster wishlist, games that share engines/have a mod scene-
1. The Darkness - miss you Jackie, real sequel never
2. The Riddicks - delisted, get them back
3. Quarantine I & II - Glorify the weak
4. Demon's Souls - lol
5. Bloodborne - lmao
>>
>>730727561
This seems like a legitimately good thing to me.
How has /v/ been shitting on it? I haven't been here in a minute
>>
>>730727561
I'm not downloading another launcher so they better not be gog exclusive.
>>
>>730736316
...you literally don't need to download a launcher for gog if you don't want anon
it's been that way since it's very inception. they let you directly download the installer.
i used to do that and add non-steam game to Steam before Galaxy came about.
>>
They've already said they wanted to start making their own ports of older games, so this is about the same thing
>>
File: the thumber.png (7 KB, 584x527)
7 KB
7 KB PNG
Any decision regarding buying (licensing) from GOG needs to be held with the backdrop that they are intentionally lying about the fact that they actually can't sell you any media because of how copyright law has worked since 1995 and they explicitly believe it's their right to strip you of any and all licensed software for forum violations.
Sure, you have installers, but they have your billing address if you gave it to them and documentation that you have obtained at some point a copy of that installer from them.
>>
>>730736154
just the typical shitposts really. they generally don't even believe the thing they're even posting
>>
>>730736674
Oh, and also reminder that they pay to make threads like these lying to you instead of improving their services like offering 64bit installers.
>>
>>730727814
They'll remaster games, remove the old ones from sale and charge more for the new ones which will have all the demaster issues as everything else.
>>
>>730736837
Oh /v/. Never change.
>>
File: 1754728770513954.png (1.01 MB, 1024x980)
1.01 MB
1.01 MB PNG
>>730727561
Sure, demasters, that's what the industry definitely needs more of.
>>
>>730727561
Ok cool? So what classic JRPGs will they save from consolehell?
>>
>>730737660
Breath of Fire 4 (but that had a not-well-known PC port, so it made it easier for them to get it up and running).
Capcom needs to put out a damn collection.
>>
I love gog
>>
>>730737740
That pc port was shit compared to the PS1 original
>>
>>730738090
as someone who's played the PSX original, I didn't notice a drastic difference when I played the version on gog.
But I never played it's original PC release, so maybe that's what you're talking about?
>>
Sounds great. Wotan bleas GOG.
>>
>>730736316
>GOG
>launcher
>>
>>730738197
He touches on them
https://youtu.be/0kZN5aRGkZ0
>>
>>730736316
Galaxy is optional, dumb cunt.
>>
>>730738627
>>730738984
Don't care. If it's not on Steam you may as well pirate it.
>>
>>730729298
Replying to you a bit late because I had to go to the hospital.
Most of the work has already been done by others, GOG should make it their business to talk to rights-holders like Sega, Capcom, Bandai, Konami, etc. and license old console games with an emulation wrapper. Not unlike what they did with Dino Crisis (other than the fact that that game was originally ported in 2000).
There's no reason for Capcom Arcade Stadium and Sega Mega Drive & Genesis Classics to not be on GOG considering those are quite literally Good Old Games. Imagine extending that to more games and more publishers/developers. Maybe it's because the GOG staff are PC gamers but ignoring the huge console gaming market seems like leaving money on the table.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.