VR devs fucking love ladders
they think there's nothing more immersive or compelling than pretending to climb a ladder

>>730789449
>VR game
>How can we make it good?
>Just have physics
THAT'S IT
JUST MAKE THINGS INTERACT
IF I CAN PUT BALANCE AN AXE BY ITS BLADE ON MY SWORD, I WILL LOVE YOUR GAME
IT'S CALLED VIRTUAL REALITY NOT ARCHERY SIMULATOR THAT SUCKS NUTS BECAUSE THE BOW HAS NO WEIGHT AND CAN PHASE THROUGH THE FLOOR IF I WANTED IT TO
JUST GIVE ME BLADE AND SORCERY/BONEWORKS PHYSICS GOD IS THAT SO HARD DUDE

>>730789962
I will never understand "muh physics" fags. It's shit in VR, because there's no sense of weight.

>>730790047
Yeah right? No matter how good the physics are the lack of weight and the inevitable clipping makes it pointless

VR is at its best when either things look really pretty like most rhythm games, or when it feels satisfying to play like Beat Saber, or when it can accurately simulate a real experience like table tennis and to some extent golf

The shooters are garbage because you can't even look through iron sights without closing one of your eyes (maybe that's how it works IRL too I dunno I haven't shot a real gun), the swordfighting games are cool for a few hours but get repetitive fast I don't get how some people play them for hundreds of hours

>>730790214
>I don't how shit works so it's bad
It shows