[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_9999.jpg (436 KB, 828x1280)
436 KB
436 KB JPG
David Hayter won.
>>
He's already a demon.
>>
>already free
nothingburger as usual
>>
File: 1762218835285193.jpg (43 KB, 736x731)
43 KB
43 KB JPG
>>730789757
>be a multimillionaire
>assault someone
>paying 50k is enough for a bond
How does 0.1% of your wealth even count as a bond? What purpose does this achieve?
>>
>>730789757
Let me guess: he was drunk.
>>
>>730789757
WORDS CAN KILL
>>
Hasn't this guy been arrested dozens of times already now?
>>
>>730789925
This has always been the case. A Speeding Ticket for me or you might be an issue, but for someone worth millions, it means absolutely nothing.
If we're going to use fines as a way of punishment, they need to be percent based. Otherwise they're pointless and can potentially ruin the lives of the poor.
>>
>>730789757

he's nuclear, he's wild
>>
>>730789930
He does famously enjoy a tipple.
>>
>>730789757
Finally had enough of all the skullface rambling.
>>
I won't scatter your sorrow to the heartless sea"
>>
>>730790006
Poor people cause the vast majority of real crime. I'm not worried about a 1 in a million chance that a rich person plows into me in their lambo. I'm far more worried about the welfare case hitting me in their barely running shitbox because they were too busy day drinking to get a job.
>>
>>730789925
Socio-economic situation of the supect should have no impact on how they're treated by law. Severity of the offense and likelihood comitting further crime should be the only deciding factors for setting the bond.
>>
>>730790006
Fuck off with that commie crap.

The penalty for everyone is the same and it should be the same because justice is administered to everyone equally. Same as it should be but isn't for taxes.

By the way, consistently speeding isn't just a fine. They can take your license away from and put you in jail. So no, the idea the rich can do it over and over and over again and get away with it because they're rich enough to pay the fine which is all that will ever happen to them is crap.
>>
>>730790143
Do you even know what the point of a bond is? It's supposed to "bond" the offender to the case so that they don't run away or miss the court appointments.

The socio-economic situation is literally the only relevant factor. Set the bond too high and it might be unpayable to the offender. Set it too low and you failed at the original purpose of forcing them to take the case seriously.

A 50k bond would be unpayable for most American so they are clearly taking his socioeconomic situation in account. It just wasn't enough.
>>
>>730790006
Wouldn't that give the poor less reasons to avoid committing crime?
>>
>>730790237
i gotta ask anon, what's your favorite flavor of boot?
leather, faux leather, rubber?
>>
>>730790237
Bonds are not penalties. Your entire post falls flat just from this.

You're just too stupid to even be having this conversation. Probably an underager.
>>
>>730789757
I feel like Keifer would have been a perfect replacement VA for Sam Fisher. It's a shame he got stuck into MGSV.
>>
>>730790138
>Poor people cause the vast majority of real crime
Yeah, it was the local fent addy nodding off who gave the executive order of invading Venezuela
>>
>>730790309
I responded the person talking about penalties and not the person talking about bonds for a reason, you fucking moron.
>>
>>730790356
No, you also posted >>730790143, and >>730790274 blew you out of the water. Shut the fuck up and go learn more about how the world works maggot
>>
>>730790138
>>730790237
fucking retards
>>
>>730790380
>you also posted >>730790143, and >>730790274
No, I didn't.
>>
File: kiefer-sutherland-tree.gif (3.02 MB, 496x280)
3.02 MB
3.02 MB GIF
>>730789757
He shurvive?
>>
>>730790006
If you get enough speeding tickets you lose your license. You just want to punish "the rich" because you are a filthy marxist.
>>
File: file.png (1.11 MB, 1280x720)
1.11 MB
1.11 MB PNG
>>730789930
>Let me guess: he was drunk.
Probably.

He's gotten like 4 DUIs with the last leading to 48 days in jail. So him calling a ride-share while wasted IS him actually doing the responsible thing instead of driving himself. Even if it did still lead him to going full retard and getting arrested.

>I'M NUCLEAR
>>
>>730789757
https://.youtube.com/watch?v=H7lUCghDJ7w
>>
>>730790402
So you believe rich people should receive harsher penalties than poor people just because they're rich?

If the penalty is prison instead of a fine do you think rich people should automatically get longer sentences just because they're rich?

If you think the answer to that is "Yes" you're objectively a commie.
>>
>>730790346
The oil is American property now. Cry more.
>>
>>730789757
Kiefer Sutherland has always been an asshole and 24 sucked ass.
>>
>>730790346
>b-but Trump!
>>
>>730790495
A percentage based fine IS the same penalty.
>>
>>730789757
So what was it? Assault or threats?
>>
>>730789873
>>730789925
Yes Keifer still has to show up to court it's not like he got off scott free with a fine.

Also seems to be conflicting info on whether he assaulted the driver or some other fellow passenger:
>In the early hours of 13 January 2026, Sutherland was arrested in Hollywood after allegedly physically assaulting a fellow rideshare vehicle passenger while making felony criminal threats.

Also the report of assault came in at 12:15 AM so that tends to be drunk people hours unless he was on something like a late flight.
>>
>>730790635
You don't understand what a penalty is for. It's relative to the offense committed, not the impact it has on the perpetrator.
>>
>>730790237
>The penalty for everyone is the same and it should be the same because justice is administered to everyone equally.
yes the percentage would be the same for everyone
>>
>>730790237
It depends
If repeated offences will quickly escalate the punishment, it's not so bad
But if someone can offend with impunity because the fine is a drop in the bucket for them, they essentially just don't have to follow that rule
IMO it's more of a problem with corporations doing hostile dystopian shit and having to pay fines that are less than what they make for doing hostile dystopian shit
I don't care as much when it comes to individuals, but the idea is that having money shouldn't make you immune to the consequences of the law.
>>
>>730790237
Aren't you a bit too young to believe in the red scare ?
>>
>>730790797
See
>>730790737
The penalty is supposed to represent an objective level of harm from the offense. You can't be adjusting that down for poor people because they can't afford it. If they couldn't have afforded it they shouldn't have committed the crime.

lol

I had to say that exact last part to someone in the real life the other day. "If you can't afford to pay the fine then you shouldn't have risked the fine in the first place by breaking the law." He was not a happy chappy but tough shit, that's how the fucking law works and it's specifically by design.
>>
>>730790892
>red scare
He's wrong about this particular thing but he's right to have no tolerance for commies, commie
>>
>>730789757
good, ride-share drivers are subhuman
>>
>>730790910
The percentage would make it difficult for EVERYONE to pay the fine thoughever
>>
>>730790910
>If you can't afford to pay the fine then you shouldn't have risked the fine in the first place by breaking the law
So someone who can pay the fine should be less apprehensive about breaking the law?
>>
>>730790006
Yeah that's the point though, american's economy benefits a lot from prison slave labor so they need a constant influx of peasants
>>
>>730790892
>Stalin worshiping KGB nigger in charge of Russia
>Red China more aggressive than ever
The Red Scare is more alive than ever.
>>
>>730790992
Difficult in paying is not a factor. Other things can be a factor in determining penalty, e.g. being a repeat offender, but your socio-economic situation is just not relevant and it shouldn't be. If you can't do the time, don't do the crime.
>>
>>730790947
Hi anon, it's me, Elon Musk
Thank you for defending us, the little guys, your patriotic hatred of communism has been noted, and your chances of becoming rich have now gone from 0.00178 to 0.00200. All courtesy of yours truly.
No need to thank me, and keep fighting the good fight for us.
>>
File: 6309.gif (20 KB, 220x291)
20 KB
20 KB GIF
if the punishment for a crime is a fine, then that crime only exists for the lower class
>>
>>730789757
Mumble Parasite mumble demon
>>
>>730791074
>Difficult in paying is not a factor. Other things can be a factor in determining penalty, e.g. being a repeat offender, but your socio-economic situation is just not relevant and it shouldn't be.
Fines exist to deter crimes that aren't serious enough for prison
Fines do not deter rich people and thus do not function as intended
>>
>>730791012
You'll find the law takes a stronger and stronger hand against repeat offenders.

Unless you live a dem stronghold and the offender is poor. In which case they are just set free over and over and over again. That's how you like it, right? Commie fuck.
>>
File: Terry Davis Gorilla.jpg (29 KB, 665x126)
29 KB
29 KB JPG
>>730790910
That implies that if you can afford the fine you are welcome to commit the crime.
>>
>>730791154
>You shouldn't be able to pay your way out of crime
Anon you're talking to people who made a criminal pedophile their president.
>>
>>730789925
Bonds are dependent on the judge. You should see the wild stupid bond issued for more grievous crimes.
>>
>>730790237
> Same as it should be but isn't for taxes.
But higher taxes on higher earnings is a factually good thing for society and was responsible for the most prosperous period in modern society (the 60s and 70s). Our economies are fucked because the rich reee’d over having to pay and extra 1-2 thousand out of their millions. They would rather society degenerate to complete debauchery instead of let their hoarded wealth be used for schools and hospitals. Crime punishment is the same thing. If millionaires’ punishment was as devastating to their life as a speeding ticket is to someone in poverty, there would be a lot less fraud, scams, and tax evasion in the world.
>>
>>730791104
>if you don't want ideologue bureaucrats to decide what you may own, how you must work and whether you may eat today, it's because you worship the rich and harbor delusions of joining them
Even in the absence of everything else, a commie's relentless disingenuousness would be reason enough to hate him
>>
>>730791197
I don't believe in income tax at all.

We are taxed far, far, far too much. And most of that money collected is completely wasted.
>>
>>730791221
> don’t worry about the evil in front of your eyes, worry about scary hypotheticals instead
>>
>>730791141
You're not incorrect about either point, but I think you're dodging my question.
If you are saying "Don't do the crime IF you can't afford the fine", isn't that literally saying that being able to afford it means you should be less hesitant to do the crime?
>>
>>730791221
>what you may own
anon, you have to pay premiums on goods from other countries right now simply because a rich man doesn't want you owning them over the things his factory-owning buddies make
>how you must work
huh
>and whether you may eat today
ah yes, they get all of the surplus value you produce, you get to buy groceries this week
true freedom
>>
>>730791281
Oh great, libertarians

> if we don’t get taxed and don’t have any governing or regulations, everyone will suddenly be fair and decent to each other and won’t resort to fiefdoms and warfare

Read a book lil bro
>>
lol burgers enjoy being cucked by rich people
>>
>>730790237
>The penalty for everyone is the same and it should be the same because justice is administered to everyone equally
Cool. So how many of those bankers who fucked our country over are in jail? Zero. How many of them paid back the taxpayer money they stole from us? Zero. So shut the fuck up you bootlicking wankstain.
>>
Diamond Boozehounds
>>
>>730791141
FYI when I said you're not wrong about either point, I meant the escalating penalty and how shit democrat cities are. I'm not a commie and I hate them too. But I still don't like rich people being able to commit crime with impunity. We're all supposed to be equal as far as the law and punishment is concerned.
>>
>>730791398
I swear I'll be rich one day bro then I'll get all these sweet benefits
>>
>>730791398
It's actually insane how people will justify anything so long as "the market" did it. Like bro, getting fined $100 for jaywalking ruins someone's whole month, but that same $100 is pocket change to Bezos. There's no equality under the law if punishment scales with poverty.
>>
>>730791398
you don't get it anon, i have a 0.0010% chance of becoming upper middle class-rich
and i will lick all the boots i can for that chance
>>
>>730791324
You are an evil in front of my eyes. What makes you think I ignore the others.
>>730791338
I can be unhappy about those things and also realize the communism is incredibly shit and evil. The enemy of your enemy is not always your friend.
>>
>>730791338
The point of the phrase is just that the consequences of the actions you took being debilitating is not a reason to be absolved of those consequences.

To me, whining about how fines aren't fair to poor people is no different to women whining about how it's not fair to send them to jail because they have a kid at home. We specifically ignore that sort of shit when determining penalties otherwise the equal application of justice becomes non-existent. You start getting the bullshit like "Well, white men are evil so they should have the harshest penalties while black people are victims of oppression so they should have the most lenient penalties", etc., etc. That shit is an affront to justice.
>>
>>730791460
>Like bro, getting fined $100 for jaywalking ruins someone's whole month, but that same $100 is pocket change to Bezos.
Realistically, how many Bezos's are there, and how many of them are jaywalking? Do you think Bezos should pay 100 million dollars for jaywalking?
>>
>>730790237
>because justice is administered to everyone equally
What is foid and black privilege. Also democrat judges.
>>
File: 1741714906779726.jpg (81 KB, 419x480)
81 KB
81 KB JPG
>retards arguing because they dont know what a "bond" is
You niggers are so fucking ignorant, it never fails to entertain
>>
>>730791382
I never called for the abolition of taxes. I just don't believe in taxing someone for earning money and then taxing them for spending money. It's double-dipping. One or the other. I think the latter should be the one.
>>
>>730791221
>ideologue bureaucrats to decide what you may own, how you must work and whether you may eat today
This happens under capitalism every single day. Enjoy owning nothing instead.
>>
David Hayter has a childlike voice and needs to pretend to be a man. Kiefer Sutherland is a man.
>>
>>730791521
second part meant for >>730791370
>>
File: leftist.jpg (60 KB, 1024x576)
60 KB
60 KB JPG
>>730790237
>Fuck off with that commie crap.
The only commie take is the one where you say Keifer is somehow the same as other people and should adhere to the same rules.
That's tough. If you're a lifted, famous person, everyone knows you and everyone will go the extra mile to report any misbehavior to the police. Anyone else they might get off with a warning, but if it's a high time actor especially commies love seeing them taken out of the spotlight, because the entire idea of individualistic worship creeps them out.

For the rest of us it's the claustrophobia of collectivism. A disgusting human trait but it represents the vast, ignorant, dog-faced majority, and also several /v/ lurkers. You hear me? You're fucking DOG-FACES.
>>
>>730790237
>Equality but only in the cases where it benefits those who already have it way easier
Lolberts are the worst
>>
>>730791605
>Realistically, how many Bezos's are there
a couple
>and how many of them are jaywalking?
not many, but some are raping kids and being made president in spite of it
>>
>>730791659
>the answer to being oppressed by a psychotic elite class is to replace them with an even more psychotic elite class and give them even more power over you
Commies are unfathomably retarded
>>
>>730791521
> You are an evil in front of my eyes. What makes you think I ignore the others
You’re actively defending the behaviour of billionaires in this thread. Meanwhile, you’re getting mad at me, some random anon, for pointing this out, I wonder what boogeyman you’ve crafted in your head about me
>>
>>730791590
>not a reason to be absolved of those consequences.
You are de-facto absolved of consequences if the consequences are proportionally trivial.
>>
>>730790274
No, sorry but this is just stupid. Either people are equal in the eyes of the law or the law loses all of its purpose.
>r-rich people don't suffer the same consequences for committing crimes as poor people do!
Okay? They are also responsible for like 0.01% of all crimes ever. Poor people on the other hand do need deterrents like unpayable bonds or higher sentences.
Rich people are also much more productive and bring much more value to the societies they live in.
>>
>>730791521
Okay because communism is evil we should tolerate a few civil rights lost with a little of extrajudicial action to help combat it, lest we fall victims to communism
>>
>>730791521
>I can be unhappy about those things
then why do you treat everybody who is in this thread like a "commie" for being unhappy about these things too.
You do know there are more options out there than unbridled neoliberalism and authoritarian communism, right?
>>
>>730791753
>even more psychotic elite class
Ones who at least give you a house you can own instead of mortgage slavery at best or rentcucking at worst? Yeah, kill yourself, jeet.
>>
>>730791851
trying too hard
>>
>>730791851
> Either people are equal in the eyes of the law or the law loses all of its purpose.
> They are also responsible for like 0.01% of all crimes ever.

You realise you’re saying this as the elites start wars to cover up their international pedo ring, right?
>>
>>730791836
Doesn't matter. Because the penalty is determined by the severity of the offense, not the impact of the consequence of the penalty. Whether the impact on the perpetrator is grand or minor is just not relevant. Legislation determines the penalty. That's why, for example, people don't get a get out of jail free card just because they have dependents at home. Kids losing their only parent is probably going to have a major impact on many people who are arguably innocent here but you still go to jail for murder regardless.
>>
File: GrooseisLoose.jpg (23 KB, 600x626)
23 KB
23 KB JPG
>>730791141
>Have to wait for repeat offense for a meaningful punishment because the fine is easily payable
>>
>>730791637
They don't care what a bond is, they want to complain about other people having more money than they have. They want to argue about rich people, not about how the justice system actually functions
>>
>>730791918
At least I'm not trying to apply relativity to jurisprudence lol
>>730791929
And who is going to hold them accountable? They're the law, you douche. I'm not talking about the presidents of the US or billionaires, I'm talking about people like Sutherland or Diddy.
>>
>>730791590
I can see why you think means shouldn't be considered and how that can lead to special treatment that gets in the way of justice.
But a system that lets you ignore penalties entirely because you're rich makes laws meaningless. It functionally lets you break the rules as much as you like if costs you, say, as much as you make in a minute.
That is why penalties escalate with repeat offenses, sure, but it doesn't always work that way, and like I've said previously there are times when a corporation can make a net profit by breaking the law and paying a fine if they get caught. The fine becomes a business expense.
This is in addition to the legal system being incredibly costly and complicated, meaning its often the people who can hire the best lawyers who win.
I can see your points against percentage fines, but it's not a commie thing to be in favor of them. It's wanting the law to apply to everyone.
FYI I don't even like progressive taxes. I don't hate the rich and I'm not a commie.
>>
>>730790404
How did you manage to include the comma in your reply but not read it, you absolute animal
>>
>>730791851
>Either people are equal in the eyes of the law or the law loses all of its purpose.
which brings us back to our original point
we're not equal in the eyes of the law as long as rich folk can just pay their way out of its punishments without any detriment to their net worth
in fact we are so unequal in the eyes of the law that if you did what trump did you'd get four years in jail and hefty fines, he's a millionaire so instead he got elected again and was able to erase records of his pedophilic actions
you try doing that with your 17 usd/hr job, anon
>>
>>730789757
Based 24 hour man
>>
>>730791605
Nobody should have to pay a fine for jaywalking.
But maybe an upper limit on fines, and after that it starts becoming more like 5 hours of community service
>>
>>730791916
>own
kek
>jeet
even more kek
>>
>>730789757
>Grabs driver from behind as they're stuck in traffic, holding a cheap cafe plastic spoon to his neck
>"SPEAK."
>"Uuuhh, I thought the Lost Boys was pretty good."
>>
>>730791605
>Do you think Bezos should pay 100 million dollars for jaywalking?
Yes
>>
>>730792091
You've raised other points I don't entirely disagree with. I am especially not a fan of corporate personhood. People should be responsible for the decisions they make and having an intangible legal construct buffering you and absorbing the consequences of your decisions is shit.

But I am absolutely firmly of the opinion the penalties should be applied equally across the board. I think that is actually critically important to the justice system.
>>
The only reason he got the role in MGSV to begin with is because he's basically blacklisted from most of Hollywood due to his drinking and his friend Avi Arad threw him a bone.
>>
>>730792393
I can definitely see where you're coming from, it's a principled and well reasoned position. (I'm also glad we agree that corporations are bullshit)
>>
I hate anglophone analytards so much
>>
The awful thing about communism is it inevitably kills millions of people
The great thing about communism is that it inevitably kills millions of communists
>>
>>730792942
The only reason he got any role ever is because he's Donald Sutherland's son. He should be deported
>>
Every time the word 'communism' is dropped on this board you're reminded that /v/ is a low IQ board. You guys are like apes flinging shit at each other.
>>
>>730790237
>The penalty for everyone is the same
Alex Baldwin shot someone to death and didn't even get a stern talking to. If that had been some random extra on set that day, they would have been jailed never to see the light of day again.
>>
>>730793221
>flinging shit
Just one of the perks of controlling the means of production
>>
Kept ya waiting huh
>>
>>730793509
the guy who shot brandon lee got the same treatment
>>
He really is a demon
>>
The awful thing about capitalism is it inevitably kills billions of people
The great thing about capitalism is that it inevitably creates billions of communists
>>
>>730789925
Fairness. Why should a rich man need to pay more than a poor man just because he's worked harder?
>>
>>730790006
They hated him because he spoke the truth.
>>
>>730793685
Because the penalty exists as a deterrent? You're putting the cart in front of the horse.
>>
>>730790143
>on how theyre treated
So you agree then that it should be a proportional amount of their wealth? Some broke bum getting charged 50k for bond is more than he'll ever make in his life, while its a penny to Keifer. Unless youre really FOR them being treated differently
>>
File: 1768393091688.jpg (116 KB, 1104x1011)
116 KB
116 KB JPG
>>730790006
The most insane thing for me is how big US companies like Boeing can afford to kill hundreds out of sheer incompetence and/or negligence and never have to worry about anything because they can just pay 0.001% of their revenue to have all charges dropped
>>
Americans deserve to get shot, beaten, enslaved, and raped
White Americans deserve it twice over
>>
>>730793770
The primary purpose of a penalty is to impose a punishment proportional to the offense, not proportional to the status of the offender. Everyone is equal in the eyes of the law.
>>
>>730794618
>Everyone is equal in the eyes of the law.
Not really, Epstein and Pakistanis were basically in a tag-team match against thousands of little white child pussies and nobody got punished for it
>>
>>730794687
Epstein was murdered. He got some punishment eventually.
>>
>>730793669
>capitalism kills billions
average commie level of factual awareness
>>
>>730791521
Communism is when you put all the wealth and power concentrated into a single group of elite retards who bend the law to ther will
What you are advocating for is exactly what Communism allows you dumb knuckle dragging chalky bitch
>>
>>730790432
Based Kiefer. Nothing can keep this guy down.
>>
>>730794618
The punishment isn't proportional to the offense if it's not a punishment at all
>>
File: 1766925798098335.png (423 KB, 1400x700)
423 KB
423 KB PNG
He was good in Dark City.
>>
>>730794880
>advocating for
Show me where I did this.
>>
>>730790346
Fuck off nigger, nabbing Maduro is probably the one good thing Trump ever did
You faggots dont even try to argue for the bastards innocence anymore too you just squeal "its illegal" lmao bunch of bootlicking pretentious vermin
>>
>>730794618
All monetary penalties should be calculated based on a percentage, then.
>>
>>730791053
China is not even communist theyre fascists
Or do you believe North Korea is a democracy because they say so?
>>
>>730794903
That is exactly being proportional to the offense.

In theory, no one gets special treatment. Not rich. Not poor. Not male. Not female. Not white. Not black. Everyone is treated the same. That consequences have different impacts on different people doesn't matter.

The fact that the fifth columnists have been so successful in undermining that very important principle of our legal system has been devastating to the western world. It is specifically why see shit like black crime ignored, middle eastern rape gangs ignored, somali fraud ignored, etc., etc.
>>
>>730795059
No, they shouldn't. It's a very important principle of our legal system to not do that.
>>
File: uuuu.gif (1.97 MB, 381x434)
1.97 MB
1.97 MB GIF
>>730795000
Trvke an trips
>>
>>730794959
The part where you argued that proportional fines are commie shit because youre a single digit IQ nigger?
>>
>>730795000
I wanna see him bomb Iran again that'd be sweet
>>
>>730795112
not having a deterring penalty is special treatment
I think we agree justice should be blind, just not about what that looks like
>>
All fines should be percentage based
Also when I get drunk and punch random people they should only be allowed to hit back with a fraction of their strength because I'm not really tough enough to handle a full force swing
>>
>>730795220
Different anon. I'm the one who hates commies and thinks proportional fines are good.
>>
>>730790237
but the penalty for everyone is not the same.
>>
>>730795340
This but I rape them hard and deep
>>
>>730795340
>getting hit after punching people
Not part of the judicial institution
>>
>>730789890
Why do you feel the need to post kpop girls? Are you retarded?
Dont answer that, its a rhetorical question
>>
>>730795282
Well, let's just make all penalties be life in prison then. That's sure to deter everyone.

You people are approaching this from an assumption of rich people always commit crimes and then get away with it because monetary penalties are less impactful on them than they are on the poor. That's not something we actually see in practice though.
>>
>>730795508
I don't think rich people commit more crime, I just think deterrence is an important part of penalties and I don't like some people having to follow rules that other people don't
>>
>>730795508
>>730795647
I misread you a bit
I don't think rich people always get away with crimes
But there are some rules rich people just don't have to follow
>>
File: 1637504780051.jpg (183 KB, 2048x1403)
183 KB
183 KB JPG
>>730790237
I really wish that was true anon. But judges and DAs are so unbelievable biased now. Average Joe's like you and me will get tossed in jail.

But the criminal underclass and the perpetually wealthy never face any real consequences. There are essentially 3 separate justice systems in the US.
>>
>>730795690
>But there are some rules rich people just don't have to follow
Such as?
>>
File: 1766590717156722.png (189 KB, 1024x1024)
189 KB
189 KB PNG
Why are you people acting like it's some outrage that he's out on bail? If anything it's ridiculous he got charged with a crime at all. Who hasn't made some drunk death threats, and he gets arrested for that?
>land of the free
>>
>>730789890
I drive a black car at the airport and you'd be surprised how often you get "big shots" in your car. If I wasn't an immigrant poorfag with no connections, using something like uber or the sort is probably the first thing I'd avoid.

Mostly the reason people do it its because they can expense it instead of hiring a private driver everywhere they go out of pocket
>>
How hard is it to just consider your station in life and your ability to weather any potential fines before choosing to break the law?
>>
>>730795724
>Such as?
... any punishment that only attracts a fine.
>>
>>730795893
How come the rich can do whatever they want as long as they pay what's basically chump change?

Fuck may as well just legally allow them to murder people who they don't like as long as they pay the fine.
>>
>>730795958
Those are exactly as applicable to the rich
>>
>>730795098
>Not real communism!
Not a single political system has ever "really" been done. Blank room theories simply cannot account for all the chaos and flaws inherent to humans, and communism is no different. Even Crusaders and Jihadist and Buddhist warrior monks did stuff that was contrary to their teachings. But the indisputable fact of the matter is that all those groups use those banners and ideals to gain followers and power. Even Hitler was happy to hand out "honorary Aryan" status to the Chinese, Japanese, Indians, and Amerindians in an effort to gain followers against the USSR and destabilize the British Empire and America.
When China wants to gain influence in Africa and South America, and even in the West, they don't show the realities of mass surveillance and censorship, the wealth and corruption of the politburo, or the imperialistic nature of their countries, they preach about "anti-imperialism", and the exploitation of the global south, and a "multi-polar world". I know this because I see retards actually falling for their retarded propaganda.
>>
Would everyone in this thread be okay with all fines being replaced with community service?
>>
>>730795986
How come they can throw their food on the ground and not worry about being able to eat the next day?
Fuck, may as well legally allow anyone who isn't worried about going to prison to murder, the punishment wouldn't affect them as much as it would say a single father of 4 so it's pretty much nothing.
>>
>>730796059
>No u
>>
>>730796020
Good idea desu.
>>
>>730795992
I really think you're just not understanding why having to pay 0.1% of your day's earnings instead of 500% is not a punishment or deterrent at all, or why you can basically ignore any rule with monetary penalty
>>
>>730796020
Only if it's hard prison labor.
>>
>>730794618
>Everyone is equal in the eyes of the law.
you're a fucking clown.
>>
>>730796070
If the issue is about fines not being a deterrent then surely anyone who isn't deterred by a prison sentence is in the same boat so just make it legal for them to do what they want or increase the severity of their sentences by also locking up their family or something
>>
>>730795881
Just stop being brown.
>>
Land of the free btw
>>
Land of the jews btw
>>
>>730790237
>The penalty for everyone is the same

>we get the same fine
>you have pay 25% of your monthly wage, while I'll give 0.000000000002% of my daily earnings

Precisely the same lmao
t. millionaire
>>
>>730789890
most of them are at the verge of being broke because how much they overspend
>>
can't wait for people to learn that he gets the money back lmao
>>
>>730796230
Only $100 are $100, anything else is cope
>>
Also women should not get percentage based payouts for getting divorced
That should be a flat sum across the board, preferably 0 but we'll see
>>
>>730789890
>>730789925
the avatarfag discord clearly coordinating. now all we need is scat boy pretending to be smart or something.
>>
File: 0183847493848585.png (1.56 MB, 1024x1024)
1.56 MB
1.56 MB PNG
>Only $100 are $100, anything else is cope
>>
>If I defend the rich that means I am rich
t. Americans
>>
>>730790006
Even doing it percentage based doesn't work. The same percentage that would make a poorfag have to skip meals wouldn't even make super richfags skip a yacht. This is why corporal punishment for minor offenses and forced labor for serious ones is the way. Being rich doesn't make getting hit with a stick or thrown in a mine any better.
>>
>>730796351
Women used to get half the assets because they were expected to be cum-dumpsters and raise children, not work. Now it's totally normal for women to work, so the payouts should be basically nothing in most scenarios.
>>
>>730796319
100$ is what I paid today for lunch, but it's also what some third worlder got got 2 months of slaving away in the slums for 3 months
>>
>>730796405
seems like a defence of principle not a defence of rich people
>>
>>730790237
lol nah
>>
>>730796452
>principle
I agree. The little guy getting fucked over is just principle
>>
File: 96298.jpg (85 KB, 564x839)
85 KB
85 KB JPG
>>730789757
Jack bauer bros....
>>
File: 1743964879072986.gif (1.89 MB, 540x302)
1.89 MB
1.89 MB GIF
>>730796479
divine right etc
>>
>>730796405
Seems it's either that or eternally seethe about how anyone with more money than me needs to hand it the frick over
>>
>>730796418
>I'm not underage
could've fooled me
>>
File: 982.jpg (59 KB, 720x711)
59 KB
59 KB JPG
>>730790006
>>
File: 123453243242.png (781 KB, 1179x1270)
781 KB
781 KB PNG
>>730796486
I don't get it
What's the joke
BBC
>>
>>730796479
He shouldn't have broken laws if the punishment was too much for him to handle but hey, if he could think more than a day ahead then he wouldn't be so poor in the first place
>>
File: EuoE3IcVEAI70HN.jpg (49 KB, 765x765)
49 KB
49 KB JPG
>>730796554
Doesn't surprise me that you are slow.
>>
File: Lolbty.jpg (295 KB, 1080x1054)
295 KB
295 KB JPG
>>730796564
Who can tell
>>
>>730790006
So, 100k for a going five over the speed limit if you make more than 500k a year? I'd be cool with that.
>>
>>730790006
>Otherwise they're pointless and can potentially ruin the lives of the poor
Fines don't ruin anything
Poor people choosing to break the law ruin their own lives
Poor people do actually posess agency
>>
>>730790237
>So no, the idea the rich can do it over and over and over again and get away with it because they're rich enough to pay the fine which is all that will ever happen to them is crap.
Don't forget, speeding gets you killed no matter how much money you got
>>
File: 1699424275317043.gif (3.76 MB, 750x750)
3.76 MB
3.76 MB GIF
dalit caste thread
>>
>>730796829
Obsessed Paki brownard detected. Think about something else for a change, you ignorant freak.
>>
>>730790006
anons who make $40k just can't stop themselves from sucking off billionaires who contribute nothing to society
>>
>>730796906
>billionaires who contribute nothing to society
There's no such thing.
>>
>>730789757
Kiefer Sutherland has been a degenerate drunk for longer than most of this board has been alive.
>>
>>730796924
nah there's definitely a couple
>>
>>730796165
Being sent to prison is a massive restriction even if someone is stupid enough to "like" it. This issue with deterrence isn't about tailoring the maximum discomfort to individual wackos, it's about having a system that doesn't have a big hole in it where possessing wealth simply lets you ignore rules that people without wealth have to follow.
There will always be inequality of opportunity and living standards between the poor and the wealthy and that's arguably fine, but essentially being held to a different set of rules under the law isn't
>>
>>730796924
keep defending them anon, I'm sure you'll get rich any day now!
>>
File: 1707387606600524.jpg (184 KB, 984x997)
184 KB
184 KB JPG
>>730796904
>>
>>730797010
the real issue is the stuff they get away with completely, like openAI pirating the entire internet
>>
File: 61104.jpg (48 KB, 1080x1426)
48 KB
48 KB JPG
>>730790006
>>
>>730796924
It's sad how many people think that billionaires all just have a Scrooge McDuck vault full of money that they stole from the general population
>>
>>730796664
>1/5 of yearly income for slightly speeding
bit excessive bud
>>
>>730790237
>By the way, consistently speeding isn't just a fine. They can take your license away from and put you in jail.
What about parking fines? Afaik they don't escalate if you pay them.
>>
File: IMG_9600.jpg (58 KB, 1024x640)
58 KB
58 KB JPG
>>
File: bootlick.jpg (172 KB, 1080x685)
172 KB
172 KB JPG
I trust the denegerate billionaires
>>
>>730797039
Agreed
Rules for thee but not for me
>>
>>730797103
Yeah, they invest their ill gotten gains by pricing regular people out land ownership and rigging the massive casino that runs our entire civilization.
>>
Trust the experts you fucking retarts
>>
>>730797014
Some people have principles beyond "I want what you have", commie
NTA by the way
>>
>>730793685
A fine is an alternative to prison time. If a rich person loses 10k per day spent in prison while a pleb loses 100, then a 100 dollar fine for a pleb should be a 10k fine for the rich man.
>>
>>730795540
Avatarfagging has all always been against the rules and nobody likes to look at these plastic and oil filled trash bags. Even looking at burned anime sex dolls would be better than this gook trash
>>
He's an alcoholic. He should probably go to an AA meeting. I probably should too.
>>
>>730795249
>Oy vey, my fellow white mensch! Bomb the Iran! Very schweet!
>>
>>730797390
White golems love being jewish pets
>>
>>730789757
>Kaz... I'm already a criminal
>>
>>730790006
>Otherwise they're pointless and can potentially ruin the lives of the poor.
I come from a state that doesn't allow bondsman, so judges can basically just deny you bond without actually denying you bond. Also the judges and cops from said state are notoriously corrupt.
>>
>>730797390
Alla u akbar my brother, behead all infidels
>>
The problem isn't the punishment not being enough, it's about the deterrence not being enough. The poor person looks at a penalty and says "I can't afford to break this rule" and the rich person thinks "I can afford to break this rule". If the deciding factor in breaking it or not comes down to whether you can afford to, the rich person can just ignore the rule. Or from another perspective, he can purchase the ability to break the rule that others must follow.
Deterrence is carefully calibrated to make people follow rules. If everyone could say "Eh I'll just do it anyway and eat the fine", the fine would be increased. That's because there isn't an "objective" measure of what a fine should be. Only what constitutes adequate deterrence.
Monetary deterrence does not exist to someone rich enough to wave it off, so a rule becomes something only poor people must follow.
>>
File: IMG_0030.jpg (64 KB, 524x640)
64 KB
64 KB JPG
Out-fucking-standing
>>
>>730794241
Didn't help that two/three? whistleblowers mysteriously died.
>>
>>730789925
>>730790006
Reminds me when they introduced a new bill for speeding in Germany.
You got your license suspended for like 2 weeks for going over the speed limit and that blindsided a lot of people.
Since it affected everyone equally, they changed/dropped that shit within 2-4 weeks.
(First week everyone was busy complaining)
>>
>another /pol/ thread
>>
>>730798753
They're dying out so it's fine



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.