>CPUs: better than Intel by leaps and bounds, it's not even up for debate>GPUs: more cost-effective option for pure raster performance but worse at raytracing compared to Nvidia, also AI support is practically nonexistent unless you use LinuxHow accurate is this?
>>730799891
>>730799891not accurate at all, it sounds like you get all your information from r/pcmasterrace
only their x3d cpus are good (and expensive as fuck), the rest of their lineup is same as inteltheir gpus and vidya tech suck compared to njewdia and arent even remarkably cheaper despite being the inferior product so you are still better off paying a little extra for the better gpu and they still cant compete at the top end
>>730799891If they somehow got cuda working then amd would be the goto for gpus
