>
>It only sucks because it's so good!Stop breaking the game trying to squeeze every fucking cent out of your cash shop selling other people's content you fucks.
>>730886569Fallout 4 is good though no matter how hard NV trannies try to push their narrative
>>730886569>blame our ambitionThe main story would probably be better if they deleted half of it and just wrote another "brotherhood vs evil dudes" story, so yeah that makes sense.
>>730886569I have had fun every single time I played this game, despite it's mid story. Simple as.
>>730886569And if Starfield sucks?
>>730886952Looks like Bethesda disagrees with you!
>downfallthe story and RPG mechanics sucked dick but the game sold like a gazillion copies regardless, what do you mean ""downfall""
>>730887125>millions of flies can't be wrong!
>>730886952SPBP
>>730886952spbp
>>730887229True
>>730886569I am actually curious what's so ambitious about fallout4 On a technical level games like nu hitman, rdr2, nms and never tear down are a lot more ambitious
>>730886569Why didn't any other AAA studio capitalise on junk collection games?Where you can pick 3000 different things with only 4 dozen of them being useful?
>>730887229yeah i'm sure todd is wrongfully crying into his 100 dollar bill napkins inside his mansion while internet people say mean things about his shitty gamei don't see any downfall here, just a bad game that made a lot of money
>>730886569>ambition>like 4 weapons with reused animations and sounds>smallest map ever>shortest most inconsequential story ever>least amount of progressionI guess porting the RTS settler mod from Fallout 3 back in 2004 or whatever was really hard.
>>730887534Who is Larian
Building comfy bases was pretty fun, once I installed the mods to unfuck it. I don't think I ever actually finished the main story.
>>730887813I think it's well made and production quality is really high But what's impressive about it?Think 10 smart dude can make a pretty similar combat system with same amount of interactivity.Ig making a AAA CRPG is ambitious
>>730887781>Retard has no idea what he's talking aboutClassic /v/
>>730888045Nta What he's talking about?
>>730887456they did some engine level things that modders have been doing to skyrim etc. for 15 years but they half assed it and under implemented it so you hardly notice it, like destructible terrain and ai taking cover.NV has working carsFO4 has content from mods that were almost 10 years old when new vegas came out.
>>730886952But muh choices
>>730888781>destructible terrain and ai taking cover.Didn't notice any in the 30 hours i wasted in that game.Like everyone else I liked collecting junk but the aestic of goy gray apocalypse is an eyesore and its has some of the most terrible writing I have ever seen in a AAA game
>>730886569I think unchecked "ambition" is the cause of all their failures because how else does Starfield happen unless nobody wants to say "whats fun here?"
>>730886569Sold gangbusters and remains widely played to date, so I guess they succeeded.
>>730887125Every game after skyrim sold less
The problem with bethesda is that they still pretend they're a AAA studio while making AA slop. If you stripped "Fallout" and "Bethesda" off of the labels of FO4, it would look like any indie game made by 20 or so Lithuanians. It is that bad. So is starfield.
>>730886569>ambitionThe correct word is greed.
