[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 326.png (1.38 MB, 1872x626)
1.38 MB
1.38 MB PNG
what zoomers dont understand is the one of the left is mostly games controled in a 3d enviroment with dual analog sticks, has over 100 online supported games, usb/hard drive ports, etc. its impossible for both to be retro
>>
>retro
>relating to, reviving, or being the styles and especially the fashions of the past : fashionably nostalgic or old-fashioned
>>
If the market says it's retro, then it's retro.
>>
>>730892563
The left one also makes you fucking gay.
>>
>>730892563
Neither are retro
When something is old but still in use they are "vintage"
When something is new nut replicates the old it is "retro"
Thanks for attending my TED talk
>>
>>730892563
Retro is not a function of age.
However, because it is not a function of age, something can be retro just because it uses deliberately old-fashioned ideas in an otherwise new production.
The PS2 isn't retro, but the PS4 is retro, due to how heavily it avoided developing its motion controls for most of its lifespan.
>>
>>730893094
>The PS2 isn't retro, but the PS4 is retro, due to how heavily it avoided developing its motion controls for most of its lifespan.
wat
>>
>>730892563
just fucking stop
>>
which one had more licensed shovelware



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.